Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
@shulika.bsky.social
Worrier. Walker. Dog lover. Born to a Ukrainian refugee mom in Brazil, grew up in Canada. Lifelong human rights activist. Climate change is the biggest human rights issue of all. Currently focused on Ukraine's fight for freedom.
Слава Україні
Слава Україні
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
Just remember that America betrayed Ukraine both in 1941 and in 1945....
November 22, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Just remember that America betrayed Ukraine both in 1941 and in 1945....
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
The plan gives Putin a clear victory:
- Ukraine ceding territory it now holds, after 4 years of fighting;
- Reducing Ukraine's military by over half, making it weak;
- No NATO enlargement, giving Putin a veto over NATO.
- Ukraine ceding territory it now holds, after 4 years of fighting;
- Reducing Ukraine's military by over half, making it weak;
- No NATO enlargement, giving Putin a veto over NATO.
November 21, 2025 at 4:51 PM
The plan gives Putin a clear victory:
- Ukraine ceding territory it now holds, after 4 years of fighting;
- Reducing Ukraine's military by over half, making it weak;
- No NATO enlargement, giving Putin a veto over NATO.
- Ukraine ceding territory it now holds, after 4 years of fighting;
- Reducing Ukraine's military by over half, making it weak;
- No NATO enlargement, giving Putin a veto over NATO.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
In this respect, it's not at all like NATO Art. 5 but rather like the monster loophole in Congress's allegedly "bone-crushing sanctions bill", in which imposing sanctions depends entirely on the president deciding that Russia has committed sanctionable acts.
November 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM
In this respect, it's not at all like NATO Art. 5 but rather like the monster loophole in Congress's allegedly "bone-crushing sanctions bill", in which imposing sanctions depends entirely on the president deciding that Russia has committed sanctionable acts.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
The wording of this is interesting, too. Who are the non-NATO "European partners" to be consulted before the US president decides whether to act - Ireland? Switzerland? Seems unlikely. Given this part of the 28 point plan, Russia would qualify as a European partner.
November 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM
The wording of this is interesting, too. Who are the non-NATO "European partners" to be consulted before the US president decides whether to act - Ireland? Switzerland? Seems unlikely. Given this part of the 28 point plan, Russia would qualify as a European partner.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
The proposed security guarantee is clear that *only* the US president decides what action would be taken in the event that it's determined there's been a Russian breach. Ukraine, NATO and "European partners" are consulted, but they aren't given a decision-making role here.
November 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM
The proposed security guarantee is clear that *only* the US president decides what action would be taken in the event that it's determined there's been a Russian breach. Ukraine, NATO and "European partners" are consulted, but they aren't given a decision-making role here.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
The entire agreement is explained thusly:
On the one side you have the Russian state which is willing to wait 100 years and throw away a billion lives to gain Ukraine.
On the other side you have the Trumpian state which is willing to give up anything for a peace that lasts to the end of his term.
On the one side you have the Russian state which is willing to wait 100 years and throw away a billion lives to gain Ukraine.
On the other side you have the Trumpian state which is willing to give up anything for a peace that lasts to the end of his term.
November 21, 2025 at 6:38 PM
The entire agreement is explained thusly:
On the one side you have the Russian state which is willing to wait 100 years and throw away a billion lives to gain Ukraine.
On the other side you have the Trumpian state which is willing to give up anything for a peace that lasts to the end of his term.
On the one side you have the Russian state which is willing to wait 100 years and throw away a billion lives to gain Ukraine.
On the other side you have the Trumpian state which is willing to give up anything for a peace that lasts to the end of his term.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
3/3
Life without freedom, dignity and justice and once again to believe the one who has attacked twice already. Europe is with us, Europe was with us, and we hope Europe will be with us. President also calls for unity inside Ukraine.
Life without freedom, dignity and justice and once again to believe the one who has attacked twice already. Europe is with us, Europe was with us, and we hope Europe will be with us. President also calls for unity inside Ukraine.
November 21, 2025 at 3:41 PM
3/3
Life without freedom, dignity and justice and once again to believe the one who has attacked twice already. Europe is with us, Europe was with us, and we hope Europe will be with us. President also calls for unity inside Ukraine.
Life without freedom, dignity and justice and once again to believe the one who has attacked twice already. Europe is with us, Europe was with us, and we hope Europe will be with us. President also calls for unity inside Ukraine.
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
That is not a peace plan. It is a Molotov–Ribbentrop -agreement (with secret attachments, that divide the other countries into either USA or Russia ethereum ).
November 21, 2025 at 10:37 AM
That is not a peace plan. It is a Molotov–Ribbentrop -agreement (with secret attachments, that divide the other countries into either USA or Russia ethereum ).
Reposted by Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu
It (the G8 clause) suggests that this is less a peace plan and more a trip into Putin's psyche. It's also interesting because it gives more weight to the idea that Trump's fixation on letting Russia back into the G7/8 comes from repeated conversations about it with Putin.
November 21, 2025 at 10:06 AM
It (the G8 clause) suggests that this is less a peace plan and more a trip into Putin's psyche. It's also interesting because it gives more weight to the idea that Trump's fixation on letting Russia back into the G7/8 comes from repeated conversations about it with Putin.