SHINYandCHROME
@shinyandchrome.bsky.social
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Epstein mocked Trump for “leaving his nose print on the glass” while watching young women, wrote that Trump knew about illicit activity tied to Mar-a-Lago, and visited “many times,” and noted Trump’s planned visit to his neighbor Howard Lutnick’s house.
November 12, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Epstein mocked Trump for “leaving his nose print on the glass” while watching young women, wrote that Trump knew about illicit activity tied to Mar-a-Lago, and visited “many times,” and noted Trump’s planned visit to his neighbor Howard Lutnick’s house.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
When exercising your rights becomes illegal, it's time to break the law.
Become Ungovernable.
Disobey in advance.
Become Ungovernable.
Disobey in advance.
April 29, 2025 at 5:31 AM
When exercising your rights becomes illegal, it's time to break the law.
Become Ungovernable.
Disobey in advance.
Become Ungovernable.
Disobey in advance.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
If You Think The Democrats Should Mention Trump Deporting A Two-Year-Old U.S. Citizen Without Process, Just Remember The Last Time You Sat Next To A Two-Year-Old On A Flight To D.C., By Matthew Yglesias
April 26, 2025 at 3:24 PM
If You Think The Democrats Should Mention Trump Deporting A Two-Year-Old U.S. Citizen Without Process, Just Remember The Last Time You Sat Next To A Two-Year-Old On A Flight To D.C., By Matthew Yglesias
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Kind, decent, and compassionate, Pope Francis was badly out of step with contemporary western culture.
April 21, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Kind, decent, and compassionate, Pope Francis was badly out of step with contemporary western culture.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
For the love of God (or for demoing basic-consciousness): There are no “criminals” or “illegals.” There are people who commit crimes. And “crime” is not synonymous with “harm.” And legality does not equate w/morality, fairness, integrity, or even evidence-based truth.
Use your words wisely.
Use your words wisely.
April 19, 2025 at 5:14 PM
For the love of God (or for demoing basic-consciousness): There are no “criminals” or “illegals.” There are people who commit crimes. And “crime” is not synonymous with “harm.” And legality does not equate w/morality, fairness, integrity, or even evidence-based truth.
Use your words wisely.
Use your words wisely.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Hours ago, @politico.com revealed that DOGE is working with DHS on automating mass deportation efforts — likely explaining why many US citizens, green card holders, and even a Canadian (in Canada) got threatening emails last night terminating “your parole” and telling them to leave the US in 7 days.
![SpellWild110 • 2 points 17 hours ago
I just got this email too and I am a US citizen? Born and raised in the US. So confused.
permalink embed save report reply
+ [-Potential_Travel_294 • 2 points 17 hours ago
Yeah, so confusing
permalink embed save parent report reply
+ [H] ramoros1865 • 2 points 13 hours ago
I go this email last night as well and I have a green card](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2vtbmhmrwzbqcfv4we4uxzzt/bafkreihzoewvqjpslxfzhgd2va4qwmpxhbeyh7f3yur55pdomuhmtd46da@jpeg)
![[-| ihatemensomuchursick • 2 points 10 hours ago
<image>
Got this today at 6ame9the thing is I was born here this is the email that sent it: [automatedmessage@cbp.dhs.gov]
(mailto:automatedmessage@cbp.dhs.gov)
permalink embed save report reply
+ [-| ihatemensomuchursick • 2 points 10 hours ago
Has anyone clicked the link?](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2vtbmhmrwzbqcfv4we4uxzzt/bafkreifbnpl6vrxsj35d2na7bq22mw3cve6ptfxmlnw26totsic2nzotoy@jpeg)
![+ |-]PossibleLast3277 • 1 point 20 hours ago
I just got this same email right now
permalink embed save report reply
+ [-JOk-Comfortable948 • 1 point 20 hours ago
Me too. I am an LPR since an year now and def concerns me seeing this. I got the email from cbpnoreply@cbp.dhs.gov and email looked legit due to its domain though, hope its a scam email. Crazy idiots not sure what they keep doing. permalink embed save parent report reply
+ |-]PossibleLast3277 • 1 point 20 hours ago
I have daca and i am wondering if i got it because I did advance parole in 2023
permalink embed save parent report reply
+ |-] Potential_Travel_294 • 1 point 19 hours ago
I got the same email twice to my two different email adresses, I think its's a scam.
permalink embed save parent report reply
+ [-]Ok-Comfortable948 • 1 point 19 hours ago
I got it twice to my same email.
permalink embed save parent report reply
+ [-]Potential_Travel_294 • 1 point 19 hours ago
Yeah, me too, I got twice too to a kind of personal email address, it's even not my work email address. permalink embed save parent report reply
+ [-]thawk1986 • 1 point 11 hours ago
It's legit:
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/mi
grants-cbp-one-app-legal-status-stripped-dhs/
permalink embed save parent report reply](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:2vtbmhmrwzbqcfv4we4uxzzt/bafkreicjaemznxjd2hmdq5kwlal5klqj6gz3ugifou7ymcii54q46bxrty@jpeg)
April 12, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Hours ago, @politico.com revealed that DOGE is working with DHS on automating mass deportation efforts — likely explaining why many US citizens, green card holders, and even a Canadian (in Canada) got threatening emails last night terminating “your parole” and telling them to leave the US in 7 days.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
It's worse, the staffer is wrong. Call them back and say, show me the provision in the SAVE Act that allows using a marriage certificate to confirm a name change. There isn't one. The people who drafted the bill knew what that meant. They left it out on purpose.
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
April 11, 2025 at 11:18 PM
It's worse, the staffer is wrong. Call them back and say, show me the provision in the SAVE Act that allows using a marriage certificate to confirm a name change. There isn't one. The people who drafted the bill knew what that meant. They left it out on purpose.
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Called my congressman who voted for the SAVE act.
Me: What documents will I need to vote if this passes?
Staffer: a DL and birth certificate.
Me: The documents don’t match
Staffer: Then a marriage certificate.
Me: Will my husband need the marriage certificate too?
Staffer: No
Me: See the problem?
Me: What documents will I need to vote if this passes?
Staffer: a DL and birth certificate.
Me: The documents don’t match
Staffer: Then a marriage certificate.
Me: Will my husband need the marriage certificate too?
Staffer: No
Me: See the problem?
April 11, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Called my congressman who voted for the SAVE act.
Me: What documents will I need to vote if this passes?
Staffer: a DL and birth certificate.
Me: The documents don’t match
Staffer: Then a marriage certificate.
Me: Will my husband need the marriage certificate too?
Staffer: No
Me: See the problem?
Me: What documents will I need to vote if this passes?
Staffer: a DL and birth certificate.
Me: The documents don’t match
Staffer: Then a marriage certificate.
Me: Will my husband need the marriage certificate too?
Staffer: No
Me: See the problem?
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Ladies and gentlemen... the weekend. (also: you are important and are not alone 🧡)
April 11, 2025 at 11:00 PM
Ladies and gentlemen... the weekend. (also: you are important and are not alone 🧡)
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Oooh, I've got some anti-Christian bias to report; the current administration that targeting Catholics and Lutherans who work with migrants.
The State Department is asking employees to report any "anti-Christian bias" they experienced during theBiden administration, Politico reports and I've independently confirmed. www.politico.com/news/2025/04...
Images of the snitch portal they set up that were shared with me:
Images of the snitch portal they set up that were shared with me:
April 11, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Oooh, I've got some anti-Christian bias to report; the current administration that targeting Catholics and Lutherans who work with migrants.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Really important to know: right now, his lawyers cannot litigate the serious first amendment issues that the law creates. Those issues will actually not be appealable until they get to the circuit court stage.
April 11, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Really important to know: right now, his lawyers cannot litigate the serious first amendment issues that the law creates. Those issues will actually not be appealable until they get to the circuit court stage.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Khalil can raise his constitutional arguments both in his habeas petition (still pending in federal court in New Jersey), and once he is able to challenge the immigration judge’s ruling in the Fifth Circuit.
It sucks that he can’t raise them before the IJ, but that’s (unfortunately) not unusual.
It sucks that he can’t raise them before the IJ, but that’s (unfortunately) not unusual.
April 11, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Khalil can raise his constitutional arguments both in his habeas petition (still pending in federal court in New Jersey), and once he is able to challenge the immigration judge’s ruling in the Fifth Circuit.
It sucks that he can’t raise them before the IJ, but that’s (unfortunately) not unusual.
It sucks that he can’t raise them before the IJ, but that’s (unfortunately) not unusual.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Welp, I guess the bare-bones letter from Rubio was determined to be “facially reasonable and bona fide.”
Note that this was largely expected; the standard is exceptionally deferential. This decision will be appealable up to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and then again to the circuit courts.
Note that this was largely expected; the standard is exceptionally deferential. This decision will be appealable up to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and then again to the circuit courts.
April 11, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Welp, I guess the bare-bones letter from Rubio was determined to be “facially reasonable and bona fide.”
Note that this was largely expected; the standard is exceptionally deferential. This decision will be appealable up to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and then again to the circuit courts.
Note that this was largely expected; the standard is exceptionally deferential. This decision will be appealable up to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and then again to the circuit courts.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
OMG love that they finally interviewed this guy. Thanks to
@itstygrey.bsky.social for having started us down this path in doing a reverse image search on the tattoos in the "TdA intelligence report."
@itstygrey.bsky.social for having started us down this path in doing a reverse image search on the tattoos in the "TdA intelligence report."
Of course that in and of itself is scary, because when does it become ok to them to for the story to come out.
And as we learn more about how ridiculous it all is,
www.bbc.com/news/article...
And as we learn more about how ridiculous it all is,
www.bbc.com/news/article...
British man's tattoo wrongly linked to Venezuelan gang in US government document
A tattoo belonging to a man from Derbyshire has appeared in a US government document used to identify members of Tren de Aragua, a notorious Venezuelan gang, despite the man having no connection to th...
www.bbc.com
April 11, 2025 at 10:06 PM
OMG love that they finally interviewed this guy. Thanks to
@itstygrey.bsky.social for having started us down this path in doing a reverse image search on the tattoos in the "TdA intelligence report."
@itstygrey.bsky.social for having started us down this path in doing a reverse image search on the tattoos in the "TdA intelligence report."
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Before folks overreact to headlines about the judge’s ruling in the Khalil case, please note that (1) it was an immigration judge (IJ), not a federal district court; and (2) the IJ had no power to consider Khalil’s constitutional objections.
This particular decision was a fait accompli.
This particular decision was a fait accompli.
April 11, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Before folks overreact to headlines about the judge’s ruling in the Khalil case, please note that (1) it was an immigration judge (IJ), not a federal district court; and (2) the IJ had no power to consider Khalil’s constitutional objections.
This particular decision was a fait accompli.
This particular decision was a fait accompli.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Hard to compete with this
Sweeping tariffs are expected to raise the cost of cars, electronics, metals, lumber, pharmaceuticals and other products from overseas. But President Trump and his advisers are betting that it can sell an inflation-weary public on a provocative idea: Cheap stuff is not the American dream.
Trump’s Tariff Agenda Bets on Americans Giving Up Cheap Goods
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent argues that the American dream is about more than cheap televisions, but inflation-weary consumers might disagree.
www.nytimes.com
March 31, 2025 at 10:30 PM
Hard to compete with this
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Goldberg: I've never experienced this.. these are these are life and death issues and you don’t just put out specific targeting information, specific timings of attacks that have not yet taken place into a commercial messaging app.
March 25, 2025 at 12:22 AM
Goldberg: I've never experienced this.. these are these are life and death issues and you don’t just put out specific targeting information, specific timings of attacks that have not yet taken place into a commercial messaging app.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
This is my shocked face.
March 19, 2025 at 8:00 PM
This is my shocked face.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
!! This seems to confirm that the Trump admin invoked an obscure Cold War-era law, INA 237(a)(4)(C), which authorizes the Secretary of State to *personally* order any noncitizen to be deported on the grounds that their presence "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences."
March 11, 2025 at 1:27 PM
!! This seems to confirm that the Trump admin invoked an obscure Cold War-era law, INA 237(a)(4)(C), which authorizes the Secretary of State to *personally* order any noncitizen to be deported on the grounds that their presence "would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences."
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Cato has published an update to Alex Nowrasteh's research on terrorism committed by immigrants over the last 50 years. Your chance of dying in a foreign-born terrorist attack is 1 in 4.6 million annually. www.cato.org/policy-analy...
March 11, 2025 at 1:46 PM
Cato has published an update to Alex Nowrasteh's research on terrorism committed by immigrants over the last 50 years. Your chance of dying in a foreign-born terrorist attack is 1 in 4.6 million annually. www.cato.org/policy-analy...
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
This is a five alarm fire moment; widespread destruction of government records in direct violation of law that may erase accountability forever. Such destruction may even be outright criminal.
@propublica.org reporter Brett Murphy with an explosive scoop. This is insanity.
March 11, 2025 at 4:07 PM
This is a five alarm fire moment; widespread destruction of government records in direct violation of law that may erase accountability forever. Such destruction may even be outright criminal.
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Inside of you are two wolves
March 8, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Inside of you are two wolves
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
It never stops being funny to me that Skip Bayless’s brother is one of the most respected chefs in the world and does nothing but make gentle informative PBS shows teaching people about Mexico and how to make Carnitas
March 8, 2025 at 6:22 PM
It never stops being funny to me that Skip Bayless’s brother is one of the most respected chefs in the world and does nothing but make gentle informative PBS shows teaching people about Mexico and how to make Carnitas
Reposted by SHINYandCHROME
Here’s a cybertruck getting booed at Orpheus to brighten your Lundi Gras:
March 4, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Here’s a cybertruck getting booed at Orpheus to brighten your Lundi Gras: