SergioVengeance
@sergiovengeance.bsky.social
Gamer. Progressive. Section 230 and first amendment advocate. I love metal, metalcore and punk rock.
Shout out to @mmasnick.bsky.social. I asked Grok some questions about Section 230 and Grok thinks Tech Dirt is a great reference to debunk lies from Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley about Section 230.
March 9, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Shout out to @mmasnick.bsky.social. I asked Grok some questions about Section 230 and Grok thinks Tech Dirt is a great reference to debunk lies from Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley about Section 230.
Reposted by SergioVengeance
This ⬇️
Few people know 230 as well as Mike
Few people know 230 as well as Mike
Democracy is burning, and we need sites like Bluesky more than ever. And Senator Durbin wants to repeal 230, which would massively stifle the ability of sites like Bluesky to exist, while massively empowering X and Meta.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
It’s time to repeal Section 230. We must be able to take social media companies to court for addicting kids and enabling drug trafficking on their platforms.
March 7, 2025 at 12:56 AM
This ⬇️
Few people know 230 as well as Mike
Few people know 230 as well as Mike
Reposted by SergioVengeance
Democracy is burning, and we need sites like Bluesky more than ever. And Senator Durbin wants to repeal 230, which would massively stifle the ability of sites like Bluesky to exist, while massively empowering X and Meta.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
It’s time to repeal Section 230. We must be able to take social media companies to court for addicting kids and enabling drug trafficking on their platforms.
Sen. DURBIN: Fentanyl often gets to our kids and young people through the internet.
Section 230 absolves social media companies from any responsibility. “That has got to end.”
Section 230 absolves social media companies from any responsibility. “That has got to end.”
March 6, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Democracy is burning, and we need sites like Bluesky more than ever. And Senator Durbin wants to repeal 230, which would massively stifle the ability of sites like Bluesky to exist, while massively empowering X and Meta.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
Why?
It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.
Reposted by SergioVengeance
I wrote about how particularly ridiculous it is that Senate Democrats, led by Dick Durbin, think the priority should be repealing Section 230 and undermining the very open internet we need more than ever right now. www.techdirt.com/2025/02/21/w...
While Democracy Burns, Democrats Prioritize… Demolishing Section 230?
While an unelected tech billionaire is effectively orchestrating a coup of the US government, violating federal law with apparent impunity, and disclaiming all responsibility for the chaos he’…
www.techdirt.com
February 21, 2025 at 7:43 PM
I wrote about how particularly ridiculous it is that Senate Democrats, led by Dick Durbin, think the priority should be repealing Section 230 and undermining the very open internet we need more than ever right now. www.techdirt.com/2025/02/21/w...
"The MAGA response playbook has become pathetically predictable: celebrate policies not for their outcomes, but for how many (and which) people they hurt. It’s governance by spite, where “owning the libs” has replaced any pretense of actual policymaking."
February 4, 2025 at 10:33 PM
"The MAGA response playbook has become pathetically predictable: celebrate policies not for their outcomes, but for how many (and which) people they hurt. It’s governance by spite, where “owning the libs” has replaced any pretense of actual policymaking."
It appears Mr. Fyk doesn't like free speech when people shine a big spotlight on his dumb Section 230 lawsuits.
@ericgoldman.bsky.social
@mmasnick.bsky.social
I appreciate you folks shining a big spotlight on guys like Fyk to explain the law. Keep publishing about his "golden" failures
@ericgoldman.bsky.social
@mmasnick.bsky.social
I appreciate you folks shining a big spotlight on guys like Fyk to explain the law. Keep publishing about his "golden" failures
January 25, 2025 at 10:12 PM
It appears Mr. Fyk doesn't like free speech when people shine a big spotlight on his dumb Section 230 lawsuits.
@ericgoldman.bsky.social
@mmasnick.bsky.social
I appreciate you folks shining a big spotlight on guys like Fyk to explain the law. Keep publishing about his "golden" failures
@ericgoldman.bsky.social
@mmasnick.bsky.social
I appreciate you folks shining a big spotlight on guys like Fyk to explain the law. Keep publishing about his "golden" failures
I have no problem with porn but another reason X sucks is because I get insta likes the second I reply to someone with bots. I know bots are everywhere but Musk also gets losers to pay him a lot of money to clean this shit up, and they are everywhere.
December 28, 2024 at 3:28 AM
I have no problem with porn but another reason X sucks is because I get insta likes the second I reply to someone with bots. I know bots are everywhere but Musk also gets losers to pay him a lot of money to clean this shit up, and they are everywhere.
More proof to show that the core arguments Republicans presented in Biden v. Murthy was pure partisan bullshit from Republicans to go after and damage Biden.
Especially with a Trump appointed lower court judge deciding that Biden violated the 1A on the 4th of July when the courts aren't even open.
Especially with a Trump appointed lower court judge deciding that Biden violated the 1A on the 4th of July when the courts aren't even open.
If a Dem FCC commissioner had done anything even hinting at what Brendan Carr did in this letter, I guarantee that Brendan Carr would have freaked out and screamed about creeping authoritarianism.
Exclusive: The incoming chairman of the FCC is sending a stern message to the owners of TV stations and networks. And he is using ABC’s recent settlement with Trump as a news peg of sorts. Here's my latest story >>> www.cnn.com/2024/12/23/m...
December 24, 2024 at 6:32 AM
More proof to show that the core arguments Republicans presented in Biden v. Murthy was pure partisan bullshit from Republicans to go after and damage Biden.
Especially with a Trump appointed lower court judge deciding that Biden violated the 1A on the 4th of July when the courts aren't even open.
Especially with a Trump appointed lower court judge deciding that Biden violated the 1A on the 4th of July when the courts aren't even open.
I'm so sad Jason Fyk has me blocked on the other site for trolling his Section 230 losses.
But since Musk destroyed how the block function works, I can now see all of Jason's cope tweets. They are so funny. 😂
But since Musk destroyed how the block function works, I can now see all of Jason's cope tweets. They are so funny. 😂
December 18, 2024 at 9:42 AM
I'm so sad Jason Fyk has me blocked on the other site for trolling his Section 230 losses.
But since Musk destroyed how the block function works, I can now see all of Jason's cope tweets. They are so funny. 😂
But since Musk destroyed how the block function works, I can now see all of Jason's cope tweets. They are so funny. 😂
Motionless In White - Thoughts & Prayers [OFFICIAL VIDEO]
YouTube video by Motionless In White
youtu.be
December 16, 2024 at 6:42 PM
Congress crafted section 230 in 1996 to ensure this can't happen to website after the Wolf of Wall Street sued and won because users on a website called him a fraud.
December 15, 2024 at 2:51 AM
Congress crafted section 230 in 1996 to ensure this can't happen to website after the Wolf of Wall Street sued and won because users on a website called him a fraud.
Section 230 (c)(1) shields you the same way it shields Facebook and Twitter every single time you repost on Bluesky, Twitter, Facebook, and forward emails you never typed.
Claiming it is only a shield for the rich is a blatant lie.
Claiming it is only a shield for the rich is a blatant lie.
December 14, 2024 at 10:46 PM
Section 230 (c)(1) shields you the same way it shields Facebook and Twitter every single time you repost on Bluesky, Twitter, Facebook, and forward emails you never typed.
Claiming it is only a shield for the rich is a blatant lie.
Claiming it is only a shield for the rich is a blatant lie.
Reposted by SergioVengeance
TL;DR: Jason Fyk's repeated legal battles against Facebook over content removal continue to be thwarted by Section 230, with the Ninth Circuit upholding the lower court's decisions against him.
How Many Times Must the Courts Say "No" to This Guy?-Fyk v. Facebook - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
In 2018, Jason Fyk sued Facebook for removing and blocking his content. My previous summary of this litigation campaign: His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. The Ninth Circuit quickly agreed and then denied his en banc...
blog.ericgoldman.org
December 14, 2024 at 5:56 PM
TL;DR: Jason Fyk's repeated legal battles against Facebook over content removal continue to be thwarted by Section 230, with the Ninth Circuit upholding the lower court's decisions against him.
Jason Fyk lost his Section 230 fight vs Facebook (again). A few months ago he was super OVER confident things would go his way.
Hey @mmasnick.bsky.social @jmiers230.bsky.social wanna see a funny 230 joke today??
Hey @mmasnick.bsky.social @jmiers230.bsky.social wanna see a funny 230 joke today??
December 14, 2024 at 10:24 PM
Jason Fyk lost his Section 230 fight vs Facebook (again). A few months ago he was super OVER confident things would go his way.
Hey @mmasnick.bsky.social @jmiers230.bsky.social wanna see a funny 230 joke today??
Hey @mmasnick.bsky.social @jmiers230.bsky.social wanna see a funny 230 joke today??
Reposted by SergioVengeance
Blog Post: How Many Times Must the Courts Say “No” to This Guy?–Fyk v. Facebook
blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...
blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...
How Many Times Must the Courts Say "No" to This Guy?-Fyk v. Facebook - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
In 2018, Jason Fyk sued Facebook for removing and blocking his content. My previous summary of this litigation campaign: His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. T...
blog.ericgoldman.org
December 14, 2024 at 5:38 PM
Blog Post: How Many Times Must the Courts Say “No” to This Guy?–Fyk v. Facebook
blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...
blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/202...
Reposted by SergioVengeance
A judge already told Musk that he can't claim he owns user content while also claiming he is immune under Section 230 because those posts are third party.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
Elon Musk’s X can’t invent its own copyright law, judge says
Judge rules copyright law governs public data scraping, not X’s terms.
arstechnica.com
December 5, 2024 at 6:35 PM
A judge already told Musk that he can't claim he owns user content while also claiming he is immune under Section 230 because those posts are third party.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...
The title of section 230 law explicitly says it's about content moderation.
You're either a liar or just unable to read.
You're either a liar or just unable to read.
December 5, 2024 at 6:49 PM
The title of section 230 law explicitly says it's about content moderation.
You're either a liar or just unable to read.
You're either a liar or just unable to read.
Remember to read your Terms of Service before you join a website, or get someone to read your terms of service for you if you are unable to read them because the words are too big.
December 4, 2024 at 7:40 PM
Remember to read your Terms of Service before you join a website, or get someone to read your terms of service for you if you are unable to read them because the words are too big.
Section 230 (c)(1)
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider
December 4, 2024 at 6:36 PM
Section 230 (c)(1)
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider
1. Social media servers are on private property.
2. Not a utility.
3. Not like Verizon.
4. They can cancel you because they don't agree with you because of the 1A.
5. They can control speech because of the 1A & Section 230.
6. Make your own website like Truth Social if you don't like it.
2. Not a utility.
3. Not like Verizon.
4. They can cancel you because they don't agree with you because of the 1A.
5. They can control speech because of the 1A & Section 230.
6. Make your own website like Truth Social if you don't like it.
December 4, 2024 at 6:23 PM
1. Social media servers are on private property.
2. Not a utility.
3. Not like Verizon.
4. They can cancel you because they don't agree with you because of the 1A.
5. They can control speech because of the 1A & Section 230.
6. Make your own website like Truth Social if you don't like it.
2. Not a utility.
3. Not like Verizon.
4. They can cancel you because they don't agree with you because of the 1A.
5. They can control speech because of the 1A & Section 230.
6. Make your own website like Truth Social if you don't like it.
The government can't regulate Bluesky or any website to carry speech they disagree with. Read the First Amendment of the United States Constitution if the words in it aren't too big for you.
December 4, 2024 at 6:09 AM
The government can't regulate Bluesky or any website to carry speech they disagree with. Read the First Amendment of the United States Constitution if the words in it aren't too big for you.
Elon Musk can bake the custom cake that the hateful bigots at LibsofTikTok are looking for if Bluesky won't bake it for them.
December 4, 2024 at 6:03 AM
Elon Musk can bake the custom cake that the hateful bigots at LibsofTikTok are looking for if Bluesky won't bake it for them.
Reposted by SergioVengeance
right wingers when u quit twitter
December 2, 2024 at 1:21 PM
right wingers when u quit twitter
Reposted by SergioVengeance
"We cannot continue to participate in the social network feed of a man who proclaims the death of the media and therefore of journalists... X is a platform that no longer serves the public interest at all, but the special ideological and financial interests of its owner and his political allies"
European Federation of Journalists to stop posting content on X
The EFJ represents over 295,000 journalists in 44 countries.
www.thelondoneconomic.com
December 3, 2024 at 6:22 AM
"We cannot continue to participate in the social network feed of a man who proclaims the death of the media and therefore of journalists... X is a platform that no longer serves the public interest at all, but the special ideological and financial interests of its owner and his political allies"
Every time I log into X now I am bombarded with offers to subscribe to "Premium" at a discounted rate "on sale". Musk is really desperate.
December 2, 2024 at 6:21 AM
Every time I log into X now I am bombarded with offers to subscribe to "Premium" at a discounted rate "on sale". Musk is really desperate.