That was never right because, for one, SARS-CoV-2 is a pandemic virus so it necessarily had to be "well-adapted".
Now, a new study shows the same is true for BANAL-236 - a related virus isolated from bats.
That was never right because, for one, SARS-CoV-2 is a pandemic virus so it necessarily had to be "well-adapted".
Now, a new study shows the same is true for BANAL-236 - a related virus isolated from bats.
erictopol.substack.com/p/dr-susan-m...
erictopol.substack.com/p/dr-susan-m...
Lab leakers, don’t worry, you've got the track record to pivot seamlessly to a career in creative fiction writing.
Quick update on the news:
open.substack.com/pub/protagon...
Lab leakers, don’t worry, you've got the track record to pivot seamlessly to a career in creative fiction writing.
Quick update on the news:
open.substack.com/pub/protagon...
That was always wrong, but where did he get this October date from?
Well... 🧵👇
That was always wrong, but where did he get this October date from?
Well... 🧵👇
It said a restriction map was "extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution.”
I took its claims seriously.
The "synthetic fingerprint" hypothesis collapses. My new preprint explains why.
arxiv.org/abs/2510.23833
It said a restriction map was "extremely unlikely to have arisen by random evolution.”
I took its claims seriously.
The "synthetic fingerprint" hypothesis collapses. My new preprint explains why.
arxiv.org/abs/2510.23833
Another fascinating reminder of how diverse coronavirus evolution is in wildlife reservoirs.
#Virology #VirusEvolution #Bats #Coronavirus
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Another fascinating reminder of how diverse coronavirus evolution is in wildlife reservoirs.
#Virology #VirusEvolution #Bats #Coronavirus
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrsV...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrsV...
There is only one solution - stand up, speak up, and, critically, collective action.
There is only one solution - stand up, speak up, and, critically, collective action.
www.lab-leak-fever.com
www.lab-leak-fever.com
One might ask why no new scientists are joining this faction. Must be the global conspiracy.
One might ask why no new scientists are joining this faction. Must be the global conspiracy.
This fuels anti-science agendas and erodes public trust.
Now, we respond 👇
theconversation.com/how-conspira...
This fuels anti-science agendas and erodes public trust.
Now, we respond 👇
theconversation.com/how-conspira...
Conspiracy theorizing about a COVID lab leak is creating dangerous conditions for scientists. But misinformers spread bullshit with reckless abandon.
It’s sickening.
youtu.be/XTGM4u-l_YY?...
Conspiracy theorizing about a COVID lab leak is creating dangerous conditions for scientists. But misinformers spread bullshit with reckless abandon.
It’s sickening.
youtu.be/XTGM4u-l_YY?...
Three 🌟 recent lay-resources 👇
@debunk-the-funk.bsky.social
youtu.be/eTlur4YIAo0?...
@gidmk.bsky.social
gidmk.substack.com/p/pandemic-r...
@michaelhobbes.bsky.social
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/b...
Three 🌟 recent lay-resources 👇
@debunk-the-funk.bsky.social
youtu.be/eTlur4YIAo0?...
@gidmk.bsky.social
gidmk.substack.com/p/pandemic-r...
@michaelhobbes.bsky.social
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/b...
featuring some new interviews with @peterdaszak.bsky.social as well
featuring some new interviews with @peterdaszak.bsky.social as well
1️⃣ Came from lab ↩️
2️⃣ It was engineered ↩️
3️⃣ US-based technology ↩️
4️⃣ US-made (UNC) and tested in China (🦇) ↩️
5️⃣ Covered up by Biden Admin, ICs, Fauci, scientists ("inside job")
All, completely made up w. 0️⃣ data
1️⃣ Came from lab ↩️
2️⃣ It was engineered ↩️
3️⃣ US-based technology ↩️
4️⃣ US-made (UNC) and tested in China (🦇) ↩️
5️⃣ Covered up by Biden Admin, ICs, Fauci, scientists ("inside job")
All, completely made up w. 0️⃣ data
Meanwhile, zoonosis has only gotten more likely over time.
I have avoided publicly commenting on this for 5 years. Here's my take as someone who has no stake at all in the game.
gidmk.substack.com/p/pandemic-r...
Meanwhile, zoonosis has only gotten more likely over time.
"Likevel trakk flere bokanmeldelser frem Bratlies vitenskapelige analyse som «solid». Dette vitner om lavt kunnskapsnivå og sviktende kildekritikk i redaksjonene."
"Likevel trakk flere bokanmeldelser frem Bratlies vitenskapelige analyse som «solid». Dette vitner om lavt kunnskapsnivå og sviktende kildekritikk i redaksjonene."