1) Since posting, the CLIMIA came out indicating the low was actually 48°F!
2) Some of those record highs likely occurred on the same calendar day, but in different years b/w 2014-2025.
3) I'm using climo data 3/1/37 to now, which is the same period in xmacis.rcc-acis.org
I was specifically talking about setting a new record low at #KMIA, though it looks dependent if you take the record back to 1895 or just back to 1937. Ahh the devil is in the details.
I was specifically talking about setting a new record low at #KMIA, though it looks dependent if you take the record back to 1895 or just back to 1937. Ahh the devil is in the details.
1) Since posting, the CLIMIA came out indicating the low was actually 48°F!
2) Some of those record highs likely occurred on the same calendar day, but in different years b/w 2014-2025.
3) I'm using climo data 3/1/37 to now, which is the same period in xmacis.rcc-acis.org
1) Since posting, the CLIMIA came out indicating the low was actually 48°F!
2) Some of those record highs likely occurred on the same calendar day, but in different years b/w 2014-2025.
3) I'm using climo data 3/1/37 to now, which is the same period in xmacis.rcc-acis.org
Should have clarified I only was using the #KMIA climo data from the Iowa State Mesonet page, which only goes back to 3/1/1937 -- not sure where Miami station data was located before that date.
Should have clarified I only was using the #KMIA climo data from the Iowa State Mesonet page, which only goes back to 3/1/1937 -- not sure where Miami station data was located before that date.
Likely some multi inch per hour snowfall rates and potential whiteout conditions as this band moves over Chicago metro & adjacent areas.
Good thing this is occurring overnight & not during a major travel period.
Likely some multi inch per hour snowfall rates and potential whiteout conditions as this band moves over Chicago metro & adjacent areas.
Good thing this is occurring overnight & not during a major travel period.