What's really going on here is that after the For Some Women Scotland decision The Times lied and lied and lied and lied and lied again to its readers about what the decision meant and the Supreme Court decided. It's now getting found out for its lies and instead of changing course it is digging in.

You don't need to take my word for this. You can just read what Lord Hodge - the judge of the Supreme Court who presided over the case said himself, IN AN INTERVIEW WITH THE TIMES. He could hardly be clearer that the case was not about single sex spaces.

It will take a substantive, progressive shift in policy. The mind-blowingly radical step of doing things your target voters like. Maintain the current course, and insult a politician who is better appealing to your target voters, and you confirm in their minds that they were right to reject you.

Utter pish from an idiot.

Briefing lobby journalists isn’t accountability.

Constantly making a fool of yourself.

More utter fucking nonsense from the English media class caping for a country that kills kids.

You are scum.

Organisations who want to take away other people's rights are not, in fact, 'rights groups'.

Has the Guardian considered hiring a sub editor who knows what words mean?

For example; a 93% loss is not a 'victory'.
A hate group is not a 'rights group'.

Or cunts. Like you.

What have you got lined up for 2029? Any post ministerial cushy numbers?

Imagine being hated more than that cascade of Tory incompetence.

Bad news: The ‘patriots’ you’ve been indulging all actually hate you, your government and this country and would much rather be ruled over by Vlad and the Hamburger President. And in doing so, you’ve excluded many of those who might feel inclined to defend it and toxified the brand. Hats off.

As in “horseshoe theory is proven bullshit and anyone who cites it is either stupid or joking”?

I agree.