Mikey Brown
meshuganater.bsky.social
Mikey Brown
@meshuganater.bsky.social
PhD researcher in Political Science @ Birmingham. Researching effective industrial action in neoliberalised public services

Interested in: Strikes, unions, higher education, housing, co-ops, infrastructure, intergenerational fairness, The Labour Party
Reposted by Mikey Brown
At least when Keith Joseph didn't believe in the railways he had the excuse that we had had 40 years of decline under British Rail. That Rishi Sunak basically didn't believe in them because he was doing 1980s cosplay is comfortably the worst thing he did as prime minister.
Canceling the northern leg of HS2 was an act of insane self-harm
Industry insiders are concerned that fewer, shorter non-tilting trains are on order for HS2 — and that journey times will return to those of the 1990s
December 20, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Labour’s shift away from “immigration is good but it needs to be managed” to “it is bad” is a gift to essentially everyone they compete with, because it means that they don’t have the right position to be able to attack *anyone*.
I'm sorry, but these attacks are just not going to convince Green-curious voters, because Labour is so visibly out of step with those voters' core values
This by @umakumaran.bsky.social is good - and a example of exactly how Labour should be taking on the Greens; on values, direct and on Labour territory. Taking them seriously.
December 10, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
December 9, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Wish Halifax would drop the lip service to home owners' supposed disappointment in sluggish house prices. Just recognise that homes are for living in, not getting rich off, rising prices are bad, just like regular inflation, and better affordability for first time buyers is an unalloyed good thing
December 5, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
The essence of Blue Labour thought is that somewhere in Downing Street there is a button marked “reindustrialise” that Tony Blair could have pressed, but instead he opted for the “more Woke Studies” button.
My brother in Christ, reindustrialization is based on international capital flows, not dumbass ideas to move down the value chain by turning colleges into vocational schools. You do realize that modern industry is almost always *high* skilled automation?

Read your Michael Pettis, you utter clown.
No reindustrialising? Our academic institutions are a part of the problem, overproducing elites and funnelling them into bullshit unproductive jobs. Half the universities need to close or become vocational colleges. You didn't even mention productivity.

Brexit is in the past. That ship has sailed.
December 5, 2025 at 8:58 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
“it was the OBR’s job to stop my nefarious opponents from doing the unaffordable tax cut which I supported and pledged not to undo”
Does he also believe in the Tooth Fairy? That, and other questions raised by this excellent piece: www.ft.com/content/cc83...
December 2, 2025 at 10:11 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
It's such a bizarre framing. Labour MPs think taking 450k kids out of poverty is putting the country first! That's why they wanted it to happen! It's not because they personally benefit.
Headline on The World at One just now:

"Sir Keir Starmer has denied putting the Labour Party before the country by ending the two-child benefit cap".

Can we please go back to reporting the actual news, not someone's partisan take on it?
November 27, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Another way of looking at this, of course, is that if you took the triple lock out of the equation, the benefits bill would very likely roughly be increasing in line with projected inflation *if that*
November 26, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Sorry, no, Motability was not about 'helping the most vulnerable' - it was about providing people who need modified vehicles modified vehicles!
November 26, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
The government can stick to this plan, or the government can get re-elected. Unlikely it can do both. Therefore either the government has a death wish or the 27-29 figures are yet another budgetary fairy tale. Remember when this government promised to be serious and not to duck the hard choices?
The government’s spending plans are “25-27: spending increases, 27-29: paaaain” which, uh…the election is 2028-9!
November 26, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Labour’s current strategy seems to be announcing a policy before shouting “psych!”
November 17, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Everything they do should be about what best sets up whichever fresh-faced MP becomes the leader in January 2029 to go 'I'm new! Inflation is down, interest rates are down, bin collections are weekly, GP appointments are up and the police catch criminals again!'
November 14, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Voters really don't like inflation, and frankly everything else is secondary to that.
October 27, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
It's absolutely correct - so much of it is just basically 'New Labour - too effeminate, too pro-globalisation, too middle class', and I hate to inform you lads, but actually, the British electorate is in fact majority middle class and majority female, and this is even more true of your coalition.
October 28, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
It's just so bizarre that British politics continues to cling desperately to an image of a voter that, at best, disappeared before the vast majority of current practitioners hit adulthood.
It's absolutely correct - so much of it is just basically 'New Labour - too effeminate, too pro-globalisation, too middle class', and I hate to inform you lads, but actually, the British electorate is in fact majority middle class and majority female, and this is even more true of your coalition.
October 29, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
If Labour cannot denounce mass deportation of permanent residents, Idi Amin style, what is the point of them?
October 20, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
The key thing to understand why the BCR and the BSA are so bad is that they are primarily about finding a way to blame someone other than the government for failures of regulation. Hence: oh, a second staircase, because you can see whether a building has one just by eyeballing it.
The impact assessment for a second staircase is mental. Why is it recommends to spend £3bn to get £9mn of benefit? The low case BCR is 0.0002. What???
October 15, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Fundamentally anyone who says politics isn't about economics any more, is an idiot. People like having money and dislike not having enough money
October 4, 2025 at 6:38 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
You don’t actually have to both sides this. The Jewish community in the UK is not the Israeli government. You can just condemn the murder of two British Jews killed in their place of worship and you don’t have to say a single other thing.
October 2, 2025 at 11:36 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
A lot of pieces and people who visibly have forgotten that the quarter of people in England and Wales who are not white British or white English are also people, with electoral concerns and interests.
October 1, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
The idea that "the median voter will feel attacked" by challenging Reform over racism is certainly not shown by the data in this piece. It shows they may be indifferent. (It may mean a different important swing voter, who isn't the median voter)
October 1, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
“A Farage government will use it against immigrants and marginalised groups.” They might, yes, but they might also exploit the *lack* of universal id to persecute such groups (as has already happened in US). Having a universal credential to prove your rights can be a * protectjon* against this.
September 26, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
“It’s an evil plot to collect & sell our sensitive private data to Palantir”. Well (1) you’re a borderline conspiracy theorist (2) if you think your sensitive private data isn’t already on dozens of private companies databases as well as state databases (the NHS for example) you’re also a fantasist
September 26, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
Now of course govts can and do screw things up and when those with technical expertise/experience of similar systems raise concerns these should be listened to. But those who oppose this totally purely based on nihilistic vibes can get in the bin frankly. Govts should try to do good things.
September 26, 2025 at 8:50 AM
Reposted by Mikey Brown
2. “It’s too complicated, government will screw it up, it can’t work”. This kind of thing irritates me. Almost every country in Europe has a universal ID. It is clearly not beyond the wit of man. Govts exist to do things. “They might screw it up” is an arg against everything & therefore nothing.
September 26, 2025 at 8:50 AM