Given the restrictive nature of the "national security" and "other on going investigations" carve-outs in the document signed yesterday, it's seeming like the public won't see anything remotely helpful be released.
Can the Dems re-file the doc without those two carve-outs?
Given the restrictive nature of the "national security" and "other on going investigations" carve-outs in the document signed yesterday, it's seeming like the public won't see anything remotely helpful be released.
Can the Dems re-file the doc without those two carve-outs?
thanks for reading, and please sign up for my daily newsletter so you never miss a post —
thanks for reading, and please sign up for my daily newsletter so you never miss a post —
www.reuters.com/technology/s...
www.reuters.com/technology/s...
Letitia James
Katie Porter
VP Harris
Fani Willis
AOC
Sarah Longwell
Michelle Obama
Jasmine Crockett
Nancy Pelosi
Liz Cheney
Judge Chutkan
Caitlin Clark
E. Jean Carroll
Hilary Clinton
Ketanji Brown-Jackson
Letitia James
Katie Porter
VP Harris
Fani Willis
AOC
Sarah Longwell
Michelle Obama
Jasmine Crockett
Nancy Pelosi
Liz Cheney
Judge Chutkan
Caitlin Clark
E. Jean Carroll
Hilary Clinton
Ketanji Brown-Jackson
Repost if you agree.
Repost if you agree.
- Republicans, apparently
- Republicans, apparently
"I know the first lady role is antiquated," @maureendowd writes. "By scarcely doing the job last time, Melania proved just how dispensable it is." This time, someone else is more eager and excited to be by Donald Trump’s side: Elon Musk.
"I know the first lady role is antiquated," @maureendowd writes. "By scarcely doing the job last time, Melania proved just how dispensable it is." This time, someone else is more eager and excited to be by Donald Trump’s side: Elon Musk.