Lexi Kavanaugh
@lexikav.bsky.social
Just a human. Owned by 3 dogs. 🏳️🌈💙🪷
Women’s sports fan
Women’s sports fan
Pinned
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
So, they were regulars at mar-a-lago and Epstein parties
jesus the Palm Beach Police really sought arrest warrants against underage Epstein victims for coming forward and cooperating, and (purported) admitting to crimes, and it caused the victims to become uncooperative with the federal investigation
![. . . very cooperative, but the police at that point had to let [redacted] know that what she had done that she could be facing charges.
Q And that was after they had told her earlier that she didn't need an attorney present, correct?
A Exactly.
Q Okay. So this happens to her with the Palm Beach Police Department and did the Palm Beach Police actually present or propose charging [redacted]?
A They did get a probable cause affidavit against [redacted].
Q And is that why Ms. [redacted] and her attorney were concerned about her testimony here?
A Yes.
Q Now was a subpoena issued for Ms. [redacted] on behalf of this grand jury?
A Yes, it was.
Q And before Ms. [redacted] would comply with that, did she -- did her attorney request some sort of order?
A Yes.
Q And what did he ask for?
A He asked for immunity for [redacted].](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:eoss3vmzem55cm5kuddhdmwn/bafkreiariijffjjrgfh26o22jjr76pwprinvnbpkcho5lyi2sucfbqlooy@jpeg)
December 23, 2025 at 8:23 PM
So, they were regulars at mar-a-lago and Epstein parties
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
NEW: By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court blocks Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Chicago to assist immigration agents. A majority holds that he likely lacks authority to do so. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
![The Government asked this Court to stay the District Court's order. After the response and reply were filed, JUSTICE BARRETT referred the application to the Court. We directed the parties to file supplemental letter briefs on an issue that the District Court had addressed but the parties' initial briefs had not: the meaning of the term "regular forces" in §12406(3). In its supplemental brief, the Government argues that the term refers to civilian law enforcement officers, such as those employed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the Federal Protective Service.
Respondents, echoing the District Court, maintain that the term refers to the regular forces of the United States mili-tary.
We conclude that the term "regular forces" in §12406(3) likely refers to the regular forces of the United States mili-tary. This interpretation means that to call the Guard into active federal service under §12406(3), the President must be "unable" with the regular military "to execute the laws of the United States." Because the statute requires an assessment of the military's ability to execute the laws, it likely applies only where the military could legally execute the laws. Such circumstances are exceptional: Under the Posse Comitatus Act, the military is prohibited from "execut[ing] the laws" "except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress."
18 U. S. C. §1385. So before the President can federalize the Guard under §12406(3), he likely must have statutory or constitutional authority to execute the laws with the regular military and must be "unable" with those forces to perform that function.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6h7b2i6ttw3l4t7pvbvxdith/bafkreiftbhzwvn3vgwhqsi7k2paizvdw4t26ailljvovso3chqupnmj364@jpeg)
December 23, 2025 at 8:16 PM
NEW: By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court blocks Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Chicago to assist immigration agents. A majority holds that he likely lacks authority to do so. Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch dissent. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25p...
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
Holy shit. He was hiding Epstein files at Mar-a-Lago! No wonder it was LEGALLY searched!
The new drop of Epstein documents show that a subpoena was sent to Mar-a-Lago in 2021 for records that pertained to the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
BREAKING: A new drop of Epstein files has several mentions of Trump.
There are notes from an assistant U.S. attorney in New York about the number of times Trump flew on Epstein's plane — including one flight that included just Trump, Epstein and a 20-year-old woman, according to the notes.
There are notes from an assistant U.S. attorney in New York about the number of times Trump flew on Epstein's plane — including one flight that included just Trump, Epstein and a 20-year-old woman, according to the notes.
December 23, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Holy shit. He was hiding Epstein files at Mar-a-Lago! No wonder it was LEGALLY searched!
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
Found the actual men in women's bathrooms assaulting women.
ICE agents illegally break into a woman's bathroom in a NY nutrition bar manufacturing plant. "Pull up your pants," says a male agent. The agents only had a warrant to review employer documents. They didn't have a warrant to search for, detain, or arrest anyone there.
December 22, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Found the actual men in women's bathrooms assaulting women.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
Just so we’re clear: NFL refs took points off the board twice on a game winning drive to award Pittsburgh a win. I’ll concede the pick. The OPI was ridiculous and Jalen Ramey’s reaction, throwing his arms up in the air like a soccer player is absolute clown shit.
December 22, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Just so we’re clear: NFL refs took points off the board twice on a game winning drive to award Pittsburgh a win. I’ll concede the pick. The OPI was ridiculous and Jalen Ramey’s reaction, throwing his arms up in the air like a soccer player is absolute clown shit.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
A really disturbing video of Epstein with Harvard professor Steven Pinker ....
In the video ... you can hear a very young girl asking .. “Where are you taking us" ...
In the video ... you can hear a very young girl asking .. “Where are you taking us" ...
December 21, 2025 at 11:14 PM
A really disturbing video of Epstein with Harvard professor Steven Pinker ....
In the video ... you can hear a very young girl asking .. “Where are you taking us" ...
In the video ... you can hear a very young girl asking .. “Where are you taking us" ...
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
The Trump-appointed prosecutor resigned because he refused to engage in illegal and unethical conduct, unlike Blanche and Halligan who are eager to do so on a daily basis.
December 21, 2025 at 5:04 PM
The Trump-appointed prosecutor resigned because he refused to engage in illegal and unethical conduct, unlike Blanche and Halligan who are eager to do so on a daily basis.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
AP reports that at least 16 of the newly-released Epstein files have disappeared from the Department of Justice’s website with no explanation, including one containing a photo of Donald Trump.
(apnews.com/article/rele...)
(apnews.com/article/rele...)
December 20, 2025 at 9:35 PM
AP reports that at least 16 of the newly-released Epstein files have disappeared from the Department of Justice’s website with no explanation, including one containing a photo of Donald Trump.
(apnews.com/article/rele...)
(apnews.com/article/rele...)
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
A 14-year-old girl. Epstein nudges Trump and says, “That’s a nice one, right?” Six victims say they were introduced to Trump. This isn’t gossip—it’s horror. Any decent person would recoil. Trump laughed. Congress, the media, the public - should all be demanding answers right now.
December 20, 2025 at 6:16 PM
A 14-year-old girl. Epstein nudges Trump and says, “That’s a nice one, right?” Six victims say they were introduced to Trump. This isn’t gossip—it’s horror. Any decent person would recoil. Trump laughed. Congress, the media, the public - should all be demanding answers right now.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
WOW: The DOJ has DELETED an image from its release of the Epstein files that shows photos of Trump in a drawer.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
December 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM
WOW: The DOJ has DELETED an image from its release of the Epstein files that shows photos of Trump in a drawer.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.
Now, it’s gone.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
Hey MI6, do us a solid – leak the Epstein files.
December 19, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Hey MI6, do us a solid – leak the Epstein files.
@jentaub.bsky.social If an insider at DOJ leaked the files - they wouldn’t face any charges because the law says to release, right? I get they might lose their job with this admin, but there wouldn’t be grounds for criminal prosecution given the fact it’s now law, would there?
December 20, 2025 at 2:58 AM
@jentaub.bsky.social If an insider at DOJ leaked the files - they wouldn’t face any charges because the law says to release, right? I get they might lose their job with this admin, but there wouldn’t be grounds for criminal prosecution given the fact it’s now law, would there?
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
JUST IN: Around 90% of the released Epstein files are redacted, per the Guardian.
December 20, 2025 at 2:04 AM
JUST IN: Around 90% of the released Epstein files are redacted, per the Guardian.
@weissmann.substack.com If an insider at DOJ leaked the files - they wouldn’t face any charges because the law says to release, right? I get they might lose their job with this admin, but there wouldn’t be grounds for criminal prosecution given the stated law, would there?
December 20, 2025 at 2:15 AM
@weissmann.substack.com If an insider at DOJ leaked the files - they wouldn’t face any charges because the law says to release, right? I get they might lose their job with this admin, but there wouldn’t be grounds for criminal prosecution given the stated law, would there?
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
.
How many times are we going to allow this man & his administration to break the law?
No, seriously, how many?
#Trump #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #Epstein
.
How many times are we going to allow this man & his administration to break the law?
No, seriously, how many?
#Trump #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #Epstein
.
December 20, 2025 at 12:20 AM
.
How many times are we going to allow this man & his administration to break the law?
No, seriously, how many?
#Trump #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #Epstein
.
How many times are we going to allow this man & his administration to break the law?
No, seriously, how many?
#Trump #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #Epstein
.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
This is from an affidavit by one of Epstein's employees in Dersh's defamation case.
And here we have his under oath statement that both Trump and RFK Jr. had been guests of Epstein.
The worm turns.
And here we have his under oath statement that both Trump and RFK Jr. had been guests of Epstein.
The worm turns.
December 20, 2025 at 12:23 AM
This is from an affidavit by one of Epstein's employees in Dersh's defamation case.
And here we have his under oath statement that both Trump and RFK Jr. had been guests of Epstein.
The worm turns.
And here we have his under oath statement that both Trump and RFK Jr. had been guests of Epstein.
The worm turns.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
This stuff was just on an absolutely industrial scale. This is a girl who was aged 14 to 16 and she alone saw Epstein *100 times*. This, btw, was at the peak of Epstein's influence and his celebrity friendships:
December 19, 2025 at 9:48 PM
This stuff was just on an absolutely industrial scale. This is a girl who was aged 14 to 16 and she alone saw Epstein *100 times*. This, btw, was at the peak of Epstein's influence and his celebrity friendships:
@rokhanna.bsky.social Tell me y'all planned for this and have a way to correct for it quickly, right? Cause it's not like we didn't know they weren't going to do this
December 19, 2025 at 9:54 PM
@rokhanna.bsky.social Tell me y'all planned for this and have a way to correct for it quickly, right? Cause it's not like we didn't know they weren't going to do this
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
The White House says the Kennedy Center board vote was “unanimous”…
BULLSHIT.
@repbeatty.bsky.social, a Congressional member of the board, was on the call. They muted her and didn't let her voice opposition.
This is beyond absurd, totally illegal, and a disgrace to the memory and legacy of JFK.
BULLSHIT.
@repbeatty.bsky.social, a Congressional member of the board, was on the call. They muted her and didn't let her voice opposition.
This is beyond absurd, totally illegal, and a disgrace to the memory and legacy of JFK.
December 18, 2025 at 9:13 PM
The White House says the Kennedy Center board vote was “unanimous”…
BULLSHIT.
@repbeatty.bsky.social, a Congressional member of the board, was on the call. They muted her and didn't let her voice opposition.
This is beyond absurd, totally illegal, and a disgrace to the memory and legacy of JFK.
BULLSHIT.
@repbeatty.bsky.social, a Congressional member of the board, was on the call. They muted her and didn't let her voice opposition.
This is beyond absurd, totally illegal, and a disgrace to the memory and legacy of JFK.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
They booked a bunch of 14 year old models to come to a Mar A Lago party, told them to dress sexy and tried to ply them with alcohol.
These are the people who are willing to go on the record.
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/18/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/18/u...
December 18, 2025 at 5:58 PM
They booked a bunch of 14 year old models to come to a Mar A Lago party, told them to dress sexy and tried to ply them with alcohol.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
The hypocrisy of the networks carrying this speech but turning down far more substantive speeches from Biden and Obama is off the charts.
There was zero news in this speech which merited primetime coverage by broadcasters. Absolutely zero.
There was zero news in this speech which merited primetime coverage by broadcasters. Absolutely zero.
December 18, 2025 at 2:27 AM
The hypocrisy of the networks carrying this speech but turning down far more substantive speeches from Biden and Obama is off the charts.
There was zero news in this speech which merited primetime coverage by broadcasters. Absolutely zero.
There was zero news in this speech which merited primetime coverage by broadcasters. Absolutely zero.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
This is outrageous.
I expect my Republican colleagues to attack me in an election year, but to actively cover up fraud in an attempt to further a political agenda is beyond the pale.
This needs to be resolved immediately.
I expect my Republican colleagues to attack me in an election year, but to actively cover up fraud in an attempt to further a political agenda is beyond the pale.
This needs to be resolved immediately.
December 18, 2025 at 1:44 AM
This is outrageous.
I expect my Republican colleagues to attack me in an election year, but to actively cover up fraud in an attempt to further a political agenda is beyond the pale.
This needs to be resolved immediately.
I expect my Republican colleagues to attack me in an election year, but to actively cover up fraud in an attempt to further a political agenda is beyond the pale.
This needs to be resolved immediately.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
McDonald’s USA
— Employee: $15/hr, no benefits
— Big Mac: $5.79
McDonald’s Denmark
— Employee: $22/hr, 6 weeks vacation, 1 year paid maternity leave, life insurance, pension
— Big Mac: $5.49
Tell us more about how raising the minimum wage would affect the cost of hamburgers.
— Employee: $15/hr, no benefits
— Big Mac: $5.79
McDonald’s Denmark
— Employee: $22/hr, 6 weeks vacation, 1 year paid maternity leave, life insurance, pension
— Big Mac: $5.49
Tell us more about how raising the minimum wage would affect the cost of hamburgers.
December 17, 2025 at 8:59 PM
McDonald’s USA
— Employee: $15/hr, no benefits
— Big Mac: $5.79
McDonald’s Denmark
— Employee: $22/hr, 6 weeks vacation, 1 year paid maternity leave, life insurance, pension
— Big Mac: $5.49
Tell us more about how raising the minimum wage would affect the cost of hamburgers.
— Employee: $15/hr, no benefits
— Big Mac: $5.79
McDonald’s Denmark
— Employee: $22/hr, 6 weeks vacation, 1 year paid maternity leave, life insurance, pension
— Big Mac: $5.49
Tell us more about how raising the minimum wage would affect the cost of hamburgers.
Reposted by Lexi Kavanaugh
It says a lot about our political media environment that Democrats are called upon to defend things they never said and Republicans are allowed to emerge unscathed for things they're literally recorded saying.
December 16, 2025 at 10:44 PM
It says a lot about our political media environment that Democrats are called upon to defend things they never said and Republicans are allowed to emerge unscathed for things they're literally recorded saying.