In re Kail
@kailwesly.bsky.social
Third Amendment and bird law aspirations, mostly.
Reposted by In re Kail
"So he's a big fan of the New Deal I guess." I'm dying over here. bsky.app/profile/pale...
Trump also just posted these photos to Truth Social, including the one with Mamdani standing next to a portrait of FDR. Trump mentioned Mamdani asked if he could have his picture taken there.
"It's an amazing portrait in the cabinet room," Trump said. "So he's a big fan of the New Deal, I guess..."
"It's an amazing portrait in the cabinet room," Trump said. "So he's a big fan of the New Deal, I guess..."
November 22, 2025 at 12:13 AM
"So he's a big fan of the New Deal I guess." I'm dying over here. bsky.app/profile/pale...
Pled just sounds better. Or, "But, your Honor, Plaintiff has not included that fact in its live pleading." All words are made up anyway. Might as well go with the one that sounds better.
November 22, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Pled just sounds better. Or, "But, your Honor, Plaintiff has not included that fact in its live pleading." All words are made up anyway. Might as well go with the one that sounds better.
Reposted by In re Kail
Saudi Arabia has a very weak military. We’re now fighting their wars.
November 19, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Saudi Arabia has a very weak military. We’re now fighting their wars.
Ahh, I watched Pocahontas many times, but somehow couldn't remember this scene. Thanks!
November 18, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Ahh, I watched Pocahontas many times, but somehow couldn't remember this scene. Thanks!
I vaguely remember seeing this movie when I was a kid, but cannot remember the name. What is this?
November 18, 2025 at 5:01 PM
I vaguely remember seeing this movie when I was a kid, but cannot remember the name. What is this?
Reposted by In re Kail
order was not well taken. Basically “hey, you have long-term deficits.” “No we don’t.”
Well, uh oh. They just,,, made up that there was no issue. Well, you can appeal the ruling of the chair, saying “I think you got the rules wrong.” But you need senators to agree with you. What republicans did was
Well, uh oh. They just,,, made up that there was no issue. Well, you can appeal the ruling of the chair, saying “I think you got the rules wrong.” But you need senators to agree with you. What republicans did was
November 12, 2025 at 11:17 PM
order was not well taken. Basically “hey, you have long-term deficits.” “No we don’t.”
Well, uh oh. They just,,, made up that there was no issue. Well, you can appeal the ruling of the chair, saying “I think you got the rules wrong.” But you need senators to agree with you. What republicans did was
Well, uh oh. They just,,, made up that there was no issue. Well, you can appeal the ruling of the chair, saying “I think you got the rules wrong.” But you need senators to agree with you. What republicans did was
Reposted by In re Kail
vote to sustain the ruling of the chair in saying “no, there’s no point of order.” And voila. You’ve broken senate rules. And that can be used to do *anything.* That’s why I keep saying republicans went nuclear, but they just added extra steps.
November 12, 2025 at 11:18 PM
vote to sustain the ruling of the chair in saying “no, there’s no point of order.” And voila. You’ve broken senate rules. And that can be used to do *anything.* That’s why I keep saying republicans went nuclear, but they just added extra steps.