Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
banner
joarhalvorsen.bsky.social
Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
@joarhalvorsen.bsky.social
Consultant clinical psychologist & associate professor of clinical psychology. Mainly #ClinicalTrials, (post)traumatic stress, #PsychotherapyResearch, & #HumanRights. May contain traces of sarcasm.
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
En skulle tru at partiene på venstresiden var de mest prinsippfaste, men det er ingen som er prioriterer sin kjernesak så høyt som høyrepartiene prioriterer de rikes mulighet til å bli rikere, ikke minst gjennom minst mulig skatt.
November 15, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
If you’ve ever attempted a meta-analysis, you’ll know that authors generally do a poor job reporting statistics. If you do this well, you’ll improve your chances of your work being included in a future meta-analysis.
Our paper on improving statistical reporting in psychology is now online 🎉

As a part of this paper, we also created the Transparent Statistical Reporting in Psychology checklist, which researchers can use to improve their statistical reporting practices

www.nature.com/articles/s44...
November 15, 2025 at 7:08 AM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Helseministeren lever etter følgende motto: «Luftslott er enkle å bygge».
www.dn.no/politikk/jan...
Ap lovte tre KI-milliarder til helse – ingen av dem nådde statsbudsjettet (+)
Under valgkampen lovte helseminister Jan Christian Vestre (Ap) tre milliarder til KI og medisinsk, teknisk utstyr i helsesektoren. – Løftebrudd, raser Høyres Erlend Svardal Bøe.
www.dn.no
November 14, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Bør helsevesenet bruke begrensete ressurser på å tilby behandling vi ikke vet om virker? Hvis ikke, hvorfor skal arbeidsgivere (e.g. helseforetakene) finansiere utdanning i behandlingsformer som ikke har tilstrekkelig evidens? www.psykologtidsskriftet.no/artikkel/202...
Forskjellsbehandling av vedlikeholdsaktivitetene
Psykologforeningen har fått nye og skjerpede krav til godkjenning av vedlikeholdsaktiviteter. De nye kravene har foreningen ikke informert …
www.psykologtidsskriftet.no
November 14, 2025 at 12:07 PM
Word! Dette gjelder i særdeleshet mitt eget fagfelt.

www.dagensmedisin.no/forskning-ha...
November 14, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Science must be ethical and serve the public good. But it should not be ruled by popularity.

Truth is often uncomfortable. The call of the scientist is to seek that truth regardless. To expand the potential & wellbeing of humanity. Not shrink ourselves to the boundaries of convenience or approval.
November 13, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Y'all. N>3,800. !!!!!!!

Goodness gracious.
When do interaction/moderation effects stabilize in linear regression?: https://osf.io/35t84
November 12, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Cand. alt.
November 13, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Det er klart det er behagelig å være del av den eneste profesjonen med «en helhetlig forståelse av individ og samfunn». Samtidig blir jeg litt vemodig over at jeg ikke ble prest. Tenk å få være del av den eneste profesjonen med en helhetlig forståelse av himmel og helvete og alt imellom!
Ja, det er nok enkelt å bidra til realistiske forventinger til psykologer når man samtidig påstår smått grandiost at de har en *særegen kompetanse* *ingen andre* helseprofesjoner har.
November 13, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
And the distribution of SWD for psychotherapies for depression was very similar. In other words, we must say that there was no clear winner in terms of the population preferences -- or if you are brave enough or cynical enough, we must say there were only losers.
The observed smallest worthwhile difference in this study "means that the current 15% antidepressant benefit over no treatment was sufficient for 1 in 3 people to accept antidepressants given the burdens, but 2 in 3 expected greater treatment benefits."
The average SWD for antidepressants for MDD was RD of 20%, and SMD of around 0.5. mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/27/1...
November 13, 2025 at 4:17 AM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
I wrote about this debacle and the implications for, well, most of healthcare:

gidmk.substack.com/p/stem-cell-...
Stem Cell Infusions And Heart Failure: The Story Of An Academic Trainwreck
Some truly bizarre data behind a big new clinical trial
gidmk.substack.com
November 12, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
That’s well put and has certainly been my experience with many smart clinical colleagues who fall into the trap of looking for HTE when there is no evidence for an average treatment effect. Effective treatments should reduce disease, creating anti-heterogeneity (treated pts -> more alike) #StatsSky
November 12, 2025 at 4:30 PM
If we provide people with moderate to severe depressive episodes with realistic and balanced information about the effects of psychotherapy, potential adverse effects, costs, and burdens, only one-third consider it worthwhile trying psychotherapy.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core
Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study
www.cambridge.org
November 12, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Debatten mellom Trond Velken og Lars Lien i #dax18 viser at det er ikke nødvendig med professorkompetanse for å ha kompetanse på klinisk forskningsmetode, vurdere hvilken tillit man kan ha til resultater fra studier med ulike studiedesign og å innta en medisinsk konservativ tilnærming.
November 11, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Ja, det er nok enkelt å bidra til realistiske forventinger til psykologer når man samtidig påstår smått grandiost at de har en *særegen kompetanse* *ingen andre* helseprofesjoner har.
November 11, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Good question. SWD and MIC (MID or MCID) are *completely* different. SWD is a between-group difference, typically between treatment and control, and in balance with the downsides of the treatment. MIC is a within-group pre-post change, typically in the absence of significant treatment burdens.
Is there a difference between smallest worthwhile difference (SWD) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID)?
November 11, 2025 at 8:15 AM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
The SWD (smallest worthwhile difference) for psychotherapies for depression was just about the same as that for antidepressants and only one in three people would be happy to initiate psychotherapies. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study | The British Journal of Psychiatry | Cambridge Core
Estimating the smallest worthwhile difference of recommended psychotherapies for depression: observational study
www.cambridge.org
November 11, 2025 at 2:29 AM
Selv om vi kanskje ikke burde forby bruk av medisiner utenfor indikasjon, så burde vi ihvertfall ha vesentlig strengere, mer medisinsk konservative retningslinjer for å foreskrive medisiner utenfor indikasjon. www.nrk.no/trondelag/le...
Brukes som søvnmedisin: Flere unge innlagt etter overdoser
­
www.nrk.no
November 10, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Dette burde barselomsorgen i Norge merke seg.
New Canadian Guidelines Strongly Recommend Against Depression Screening

Screening for depression in primary care lacks benefits and may cause harm, according to the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

By Peter Simons

www.madinamerica.com/2025/11/new-...
New Canadian Guidelines Strongly Recommend Against Depression Screening
Screening for depression in primary care lacks benefits and may cause harm, according to the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
www.madinamerica.com
November 10, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Hellestveit viser moralsk ryggrad.
www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/bm9o...
Ferdig i Etikkrådet
Cecilie Hellestveit begrunner hvorfor hun går av.
www.aftenposten.no
November 10, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
Just submitted a review where I ended with my traditional "I hope the authors find my comments useful" where the unwritten implication is "once they stop being annoyed at me that I pointed out the data they collected does not allow the conclusions they wish to draw."

So, you know, the usual
November 10, 2025 at 2:55 PM
Nok et eksempel på at den israelske regjeringen jobber hardt med å tømme begrepet antisemittisme for meningsfullt innhold.
November 9, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Reposted by Joar Øveraas Halvorsen
November 9, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Det finnes ikke et enkelt «ja» eller «nei» svar på om vi skal bruke mer ressurser på psykisk helse. Svaret kommer an på (a) *hva vi får igjen* for de ressursene vi bruker på psykisk helse, og (b) hvilke andre ting/områder vi kunne brukt ressursene på og hva vi ville fått igjen for dette.
November 8, 2025 at 12:28 PM
Although I applaud these efforts, it would be quite a paradoxical situation if we regulate LLM therapy chatbots all the while in-person psychotherapy is largely completely unregulated.
www.statnews.com/2025/11/05/f...
FDA digital advisers confront risks of therapy chatbots, weigh possible regulation
FDA's digital advisors could nudge the agency to clarify how its rules apply to medical applications of generative AI, including therapy chatbots.
www.statnews.com
November 8, 2025 at 7:42 AM