Jim Aloisi
@jimaloisi.bsky.social
Former Massachusetts Transportation Secretary; board member TransitMatters; MIT DUSP & Mobility Initiative. I write, teach & advocate for a sustainable & justice based transportation system.
Reposted by Jim Aloisi
Suffice it to say, this proposal would be the opposite of what is needed for US transportation policy.
Federal transportation spending has been ineffective, inefficient, and bad for the environment. The Trump proposal would worsen those problems.
US needs a complete rethink of transport policies ⬇️
Federal transportation spending has been ineffective, inefficient, and bad for the environment. The Trump proposal would worsen those problems.
US needs a complete rethink of transport policies ⬇️
The Reauthorization of Federal Transportation Programs Offers Policymakers an Opportunity to Improve Effectiveness, Environmental Sustainability, and Access
Federal policymakers should consider three strategies to guide deliberations around reauthorization and improvement of Americans’ quality of life.
www.urban.org
November 15, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Suffice it to say, this proposal would be the opposite of what is needed for US transportation policy.
Federal transportation spending has been ineffective, inefficient, and bad for the environment. The Trump proposal would worsen those problems.
US needs a complete rethink of transport policies ⬇️
Federal transportation spending has been ineffective, inefficient, and bad for the environment. The Trump proposal would worsen those problems.
US needs a complete rethink of transport policies ⬇️
He was not displaced when the West End was razed. The family did not live there.
November 8, 2025 at 9:49 PM
He was not displaced when the West End was razed. The family did not live there.
Impossible to understand whether you are talking about the streets or the Greenway. Two different things. Two different governance structures. I’m sure neither or both could be better designed for cycling.
November 7, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Impossible to understand whether you are talking about the streets or the Greenway. Two different things. Two different governance structures. I’m sure neither or both could be better designed for cycling.
Again, there is a history that needs to be understood. It’s easy to lol without knowing why and how decisions were made. This decision - who owns and co trails the Greenway - was imho correctly made.
November 7, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Again, there is a history that needs to be understood. It’s easy to lol without knowing why and how decisions were made. This decision - who owns and co trails the Greenway - was imho correctly made.
The City does not own or control the RFK Greenway
November 7, 2025 at 3:11 PM
The City does not own or control the RFK Greenway
In comparison with what was there before, it’s a greenway in every possible and reasonable definition of the word.
November 6, 2025 at 5:31 PM
In comparison with what was there before, it’s a greenway in every possible and reasonable definition of the word.