Jessie Gender
@jessiegender.bsky.social
Director & Writer | IDENTITEAZE film | YouTuber | former writer/video producer at Gamespot, The Advocate, Microsoft, Out Magazine, Rotten Tomatoes, & Skybound | Trekkie by birth
https://www.jessieearl.com/
https://www.jessieearl.com/
Reposted by Jessie Gender
Very convenient to be able to shove the transphobia that got this girl killed under the carpet and blame phones instead and be able to deny any criticism like that
Maybe Esther doesn’t think its insulting, but its rubbing salt in the wound to the whole trans community
Maybe Esther doesn’t think its insulting, but its rubbing salt in the wound to the whole trans community
November 10, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Very convenient to be able to shove the transphobia that got this girl killed under the carpet and blame phones instead and be able to deny any criticism like that
Maybe Esther doesn’t think its insulting, but its rubbing salt in the wound to the whole trans community
Maybe Esther doesn’t think its insulting, but its rubbing salt in the wound to the whole trans community
Indeed. Though in that case it still would involve the “fridging the wife” trope. Honestly, making her queer helps the shows themes of assimilation into a hegemony stronger, so I’m glad he did.
November 10, 2025 at 5:58 AM
Indeed. Though in that case it still would involve the “fridging the wife” trope. Honestly, making her queer helps the shows themes of assimilation into a hegemony stronger, so I’m glad he did.
Potentially! Hence why I’m not condemning the show or anything. It’s really good! But it’s also worthwhile to discuss that it’s using the framework that has generally limited queer stories. Subverting a trope still means using the trope to a degree. That’s not a bad thing, but worth analysis.
November 10, 2025 at 5:57 AM
Potentially! Hence why I’m not condemning the show or anything. It’s really good! But it’s also worthwhile to discuss that it’s using the framework that has generally limited queer stories. Subverting a trope still means using the trope to a degree. That’s not a bad thing, but worth analysis.
Reposted by Jessie Gender
Also, queer representation is down right now, in a culture that’s increasingly hostile to us. So we need more stories beyond the pattern of “assimilated queer couple, likely where one dies”. We deserve a wider range of queer lives on screen.
November 10, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Also, queer representation is down right now, in a culture that’s increasingly hostile to us. So we need more stories beyond the pattern of “assimilated queer couple, likely where one dies”. We deserve a wider range of queer lives on screen.
Also, queer representation is down right now, in a culture that’s increasingly hostile to us. So we need more stories beyond the pattern of “assimilated queer couple, likely where one dies”. We deserve a wider range of queer lives on screen.
November 10, 2025 at 5:52 AM
Also, queer representation is down right now, in a culture that’s increasingly hostile to us. So we need more stories beyond the pattern of “assimilated queer couple, likely where one dies”. We deserve a wider range of queer lives on screen.
Reposted by Jessie Gender
it’s not that “a gay character died = BYG = bad.” It’s more that BYG is a useful lens to think about how queer stories get structured and what cultural norms they reinforce. It’s only a deal-breaker when the narrative is benefiting from queer tragedy for shock value or spectacle (Emilia Pérez).
November 10, 2025 at 5:47 AM
it’s not that “a gay character died = BYG = bad.” It’s more that BYG is a useful lens to think about how queer stories get structured and what cultural norms they reinforce. It’s only a deal-breaker when the narrative is benefiting from queer tragedy for shock value or spectacle (Emilia Pérez).
it’s not that “a gay character died = BYG = bad.” It’s more that BYG is a useful lens to think about how queer stories get structured and what cultural norms they reinforce. It’s only a deal-breaker when the narrative is benefiting from queer tragedy for shock value or spectacle (Emilia Pérez).
November 10, 2025 at 5:47 AM
it’s not that “a gay character died = BYG = bad.” It’s more that BYG is a useful lens to think about how queer stories get structured and what cultural norms they reinforce. It’s only a deal-breaker when the narrative is benefiting from queer tragedy for shock value or spectacle (Emilia Pérez).
Pluribus actually engages with some of this directly, which is why I like it - especially the idea of assimilation into a dominant culture before you’re actually safe or supported as yourself. So for me,
November 10, 2025 at 5:47 AM
Pluribus actually engages with some of this directly, which is why I like it - especially the idea of assimilation into a dominant culture before you’re actually safe or supported as yourself. So for me,
Queer characters are still commonly written to have tragic love stories. They’re isolated from queer community. Their relationships are framed through a heteronormative lens—monogamous, suburban, domestic assimilation. It reinforces a narrow emotional vocabulary for queer life.
November 10, 2025 at 5:47 AM
Queer characters are still commonly written to have tragic love stories. They’re isolated from queer community. Their relationships are framed through a heteronormative lens—monogamous, suburban, domestic assimilation. It reinforces a narrow emotional vocabulary for queer life.
Why do I feel this is about Pluribus? Lol
November 10, 2025 at 5:35 AM
Why do I feel this is about Pluribus? Lol
For sure. But the issue with BYG is it often kills one half of a couple and leaves the other truamazied/ alone. Also, the lack of other queer community while the character exists in an isolated heteronormative bubble and often is assimilatory to societal norms (heteronormative family structure ect…)
November 10, 2025 at 1:19 AM
For sure. But the issue with BYG is it often kills one half of a couple and leaves the other truamazied/ alone. Also, the lack of other queer community while the character exists in an isolated heteronormative bubble and often is assimilatory to societal norms (heteronormative family structure ect…)
This isn’t what I’m arguing. I do find it to be a slightly lazy usage of this trope - doesn’t mean I don’t like the show or where it goes. We can critique that the trope plays into ways queer people are often regulated, while also still loving the work or themes overall. Also, cool to disagree.
November 10, 2025 at 1:16 AM
This isn’t what I’m arguing. I do find it to be a slightly lazy usage of this trope - doesn’t mean I don’t like the show or where it goes. We can critique that the trope plays into ways queer people are often regulated, while also still loving the work or themes overall. Also, cool to disagree.
Trust me, I had to watch them all in full context, I hear you.
November 9, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Trust me, I had to watch them all in full context, I hear you.