Izzy Kamikaze
LightNews LightNews
izzykamikaze.bsky.social
Izzy Kamikaze
@izzykamikaze.bsky.social
2.7K followers 1.3K following 2.9K posts
Just another refugee from That Other Place.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Izzy Kamikaze
maggiechapman.bsky.social
See more analysis here:
goodlawproject.org/sandie-peggi...
Sandie Peggie: Tribunal rules that employers do not have to exclude trans people | Good Law Project
One of the first cases that follows the Supreme Court’s decision on the definition of sex under the Equality Act has found that the court didn’t decide which changing room a trans person should use.
goodlawproject.org
December 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Reposted by Izzy Kamikaze
johnlees.bsky.social
The media of course think a trans woman being publicly called “it” and having powerful politicians line up to endorse her bullying is a less harrowing experience to go through than the trauma of being asked on the stand “What do you think about Muslims?” then being allowed to talk uninterrupted.
December 9, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Reposted by Izzy Kamikaze
goodlawproject.org
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal.

This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners have chosen.
631. The third aspect was her evidence given when recalled in relation to a message she had passed on to her group of friends which related to floods in Pakistan in the most highly offensive terms. She initially described the messages as “dark humour”. Her evidence later was that the message had been sent to provoke a reaction, in broad summary. We did not consider that latter evidence to be credible given the content of the message sent and her initial evidence about it. In our view it was an untruthful attempt to downplay what she had done, which she recognised as having included very offensive material. We consider that it was clear beyond serious argument that the author or authors of the original message considered the remarks humorous, and that the claimant had also considered them humorous which was why she had passed them on. That was supported in our view by her reference to dark humour
December 8, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Reposted by Izzy Kamikaze
reactiveashley.bsky.social
We should recognise that many of the premises underpinning the Cass Review, the policies that followed, and now the PATHWAY studies are fundamentally unsound. Any medical student could grasp these points within ten minutes of reading some textbooks.

Hello?
December 8, 2025 at 12:31 AM
izzykamikaze.bsky.social
😂
December 6, 2025 at 10:35 PM