innostudy.bsky.social
@innostudy.bsky.social
Reposted
Very proud of the improvements made by the Leiden Ranking team to the Open Edition of the ranking.

This demonstrates our commitment at CWTS to @barcelonadori.bsky.social and the open research information transition.

Great work by @neesjanvaneck.bsky.social and the rest of the team!
October 29, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Reposted
Some real fake news! Paper mills are creating fake authors who can then serve as fake reviewers. The illustration of the fake reviewer sitting at their desk is excellent. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
How to spot fake scientists and stop them from publishing papers
Journals are considering doing identity checks to expose fake authors — but there are downsides.
www.nature.com
October 22, 2025 at 11:28 PM
Reposted
It is very good to see reforming academic reward and recognition as the first point listed in this Publishing Futures from @universitypress.cambridge.org report in considering ways forward for the future of academic publishing 🤩 Read more below 👇
October 24, 2025 at 10:44 AM
Reposted
October 24, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Reposted
"The scientific hegemony the USA had for decades has gone...the percentage of papers with a Chinese author [i]n 2025 is 23%, the USA 11%...transition to open access is only possible if Chinese researchers change their publishing habits" newsletter.journalology.com/p/the-rise-o...
The rise of China and the fall of open access
The theme of Open Access Week is "Who owns our knowledge?". The answer is increasingly likely to be "China".
newsletter.journalology.com
October 25, 2025 at 10:33 PM
AI-powered fraud: Chinese paper mills are mass-producing fake academic research www.scmp.com/tech/tech-tr...
How Chinese paper mills use AI to create ‘higher quality’ academic fraud
Paper mills that sell authorship or fabricate entire papers are a staple of China’s competitive academic landscape.
www.scmp.com
October 16, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Reposted
Our periodic review of the coverage of the major bibliographic databases (October 2025)
GS no longer the largest due to the huge increase of OpenAlex. New data for Xueshu
October 13, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Undercover investigation reveals shocking secrets of a "paper mill": The head claims to have earned 80 million yuan last year by publishing 130,000 papers, claiming he has exclusive resources and that manuscripts without ... (Google Translate) news.ifeng.com/c/8nQISfY6x7l
卧底调查“论文工厂”惊人内幕:负责人称去年发表13万篇论文赚8000万,宣称有独家资源非关系稿不会被录用
卧底调查“论文工厂”惊人内幕:负责人称去年发表13万篇论文赚8000万,宣称有独家资源非关系稿不会被录用
news.ifeng.com
October 14, 2025 at 5:13 AM
Low quality papers are flooding the cancer literature — can this AI tool help to catch them? www.nature.com/articles/d41..., Revealing the Paper Mill Iceberg: AI-Based Screening of Cancer Research Publications www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Low quality papers are flooding the cancer literature — can this AI tool help to catch them?
A large language model scans abstracts and titles for signs that an article was produced by a 'paper-mill' company.
www.nature.com
October 10, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Reposted
Powerful piece, highly recommended!
October 4, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Reposted
Thanks @iansample.bsky.social at @theguardian.com podcast for chatting #ScientificPublishing.

This pod follows from The Strain on Scientific Publishing & reports of publisher profit margins rivalling Google etc...

Paper: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...

Pod: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/s...
Fraud, AI slop and huge profits: is science publishing broken?
Podcast Episode · Science Weekly · 02/10/2025 · 18m
podcasts.apple.com
October 2, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Reposted
There’s a striking pattern among the top journals targeted by an Indian paper mill. All have sharply increased their publication number in recent years.
Is this growth driven by publisher goals, a surge in submissions due to AI, or both?
#papermills
October 3, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Reposted
Excited to work with a wonderful group of international colleagues to promote openness of publication metadata in negotiations with publishers!

@cwts.nl
October 2, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Reposted
Open Science Workshop - detecting errors and misconduct in science
Dates: 20-22 October
Location: Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Registration link: tinyurl.com/3xkd8twf
ONLY PHYSICAL ATTENDENCE POSSIBLE! NO ONLINE POSSIBILITIES.
September 29, 2025 at 10:38 AM
AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers www.technologyreview.com/2025/09/23/1...
AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers
Some companies are working to remedy the issue.
www.technologyreview.com
September 29, 2025 at 5:25 AM
Reposted
This is a great article on paper mills by Lea Wolz (in German). It provides a general overview of paper mills and their impact on science. It gives examples of how fake papers penetrate Cochrane reviews and bias recommendations. Highly recommended!
www.quarks.de/gesellschaft...
#papermills
Fake-Studien: Dubiose Firmen unterwandern die Wissenschaft
Die Zahl an Fake-Studien von dubiosen Firmen steigt rasant. Wie groß ist das Problem – und kann dieser wissenschaftliche Müll Patienten schaden? Wissenschaftler warnen vor den Folgen.
www.quarks.de
September 20, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Reposted
First thing after the summer break: getting ready for Bristol, where I’ll present our work on stealth journal takeovers and their telltale signs at @stienid2025.bsky.social. Already available at doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
September 1, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Reposted
Truly grateful by the interest our presentation on stealth journal takeovers generated at the STI in Bristol last week. Thanks to everyone who approached me to discuss it during the conference! @stienid2025.bsky.social read the whole story at zenodo.org/records/1476... and zenodo.org/records/1521...
September 8, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Reposted
Can large language models stand in for human participants?
Many social scientists seem to think so, and are already using "silicon samples" in research.

One problem: depending on the analytic decisions made, you can basically get these samples to show any effect you want.

THREAD 🧵
The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data: A call to attention
Social scientists are now using large language models to create "silicon samples" - synthetic datasets intended to stand in for human respondents, aimed at revolutionising human subjects research. How...
arxiv.org
September 18, 2025 at 7:56 AM
How to Fight Fraudulent Publishing in the Mathematical Sciences: Joint Recommendations of the IMU and the ICIAM
arxiv.org/abs/2509.09877
How to Fight Fraudulent Publishing in the Mathematical Sciences: Joint Recommendations of the IMU and the ICIAM
These recommendations were formulated by the authors in close collaboration with the IMU Committee on Publishing (chaired by Ilka Agricola) and have been endorsed by the Executive Committee of the IMU...
arxiv.org
September 18, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Reposted
RetractBASE (retractbase.csic.es), the largest open search engine specialized on retracted literature, makes publicly accessible their datasets here: osf.io/xtrsb/files/...
September 15, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Reposted
Whoa! Elsevier fired @richardtol.bsky.social, longstanding Editor-in-Chief of the journal Energy Economics. Richard's side of the story should be ringing alarm bells. #EconSky

Fraud and cover-up
richardtol.substack.com/p/fraud-and-...
Fraud and cover-up
Fraud and cover-up
richardtol.substack.com
September 15, 2025 at 4:04 PM