Adrian Barnett
banner
aidybarnett.bsky.social
Adrian Barnett
@aidybarnett.bsky.social

Statistician working in meta-research. Deltiologist.

Adrian Gerard Barnett is a professor in the faculty of Health in the school of Public Health and Social Work, at Queensland University of Technology and was president of the Statistical Society of Australia from 2018 to 2020. .. more

Environmental science 27%
Public Health 23%
Can you justify using (and paying for) a service that generates a ready to submit paper with just one prompt?
🧵

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

An outstanding long-read on research integrity and outright lies. It made me gasp out loud. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...
Did a Celebrated Researcher Obscure a Baby’s Poisoning?
After a newborn died of opioid poisoning, a new branch of pediatrics came into being. But the evidence doesn’t add up.
www.newyorker.com
Wiley: "We’re supporting responsible research assessment practices" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1520...

Also Wiley: "Prove that your article is a good fit for this journal 😉😉😉😉😉 by citing at least two of our articles in your manuscript before we will even consider reviewing it" 🤡
“If fabricated studies make their way into the evidence base, they can mislead real scientists and ultimately slow progress for patients."

Published in The BMJ, a new AI tool developed by @aidybarnett.bsky.social and colleagues has exposed the scale of fake studies flooding cancer research.
New tool exposes scale of fake research flooding cancer science
A new machine learning tool has identified more than 250,000 cancer research papers that may have been produced by so-called “paper mills”.
www.qut.edu.au

Everybody loses when research results are changed or supressed. This is an ongoing problem in Australia. As a start, we need a conversation between researchers and bureaucrats/lawyers.

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

Rules around government-sanctioned research can leave academics in a no-win position by forcing them to accept revisions that violate their ethical obligations, a Queensland analysis suggests #academicsky
ow.ly/IZUJ50Y4PJ6
Funder review rights ‘leave researchers in impossible position’
Mandatory edits of research findings a ‘blind spot’ in integrity debate, says scholar who experienced government agency ‘interference’
ow.ly

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

Fellowship schemes by Australian funding agencies invite researchers to disclose personal career disruptions to promote equity. But this well-meaning policy can expose private medical details to non-medically trained reviewers and create new risks of bias

Read more: buff.ly/BriGjyG

Reposted by Tracy Creagh

Less is more. This aphorism is constantly on my mind. The scientific publication system is under tremendous strain, the last thing it needs is a massive dump of LLM generated/aided papers. If you love science, then show it some love. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
I’m going to halve my publication output. You should consider slow science, too
If we don’t slow down, the research enterprise is going to crash, argues Adrian Barnett.
www.nature.com

This is a statistical blunder that I've never seen before. Excluding zeros and ones because they didn't give a usable number after log-transforming. No idea why they simply didn't add a constant before transforming, or better still use a Poisson model.

Number of days since I've seen an emu: 0.

A case study on how an Australian government agency changed the results of a qualitative study. Editing or suppressing research findings is not good policy, can lead to harms, and is awful to experience as a researcher.
Journal: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
OA: eprints.qut.edu.au/262261/
Client Challenge
link.springer.com

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

The NIH has lost its scientific integrity. So we left www.statnews.com/2026/01/10/n... via @statnews.com

The complete collapse of the NIH, CDC, and FDA is so tragic and damaging to not only the U.S., but the world...

Dark Age 2.0.
The NIH has lost its scientific integrity. So we left
“We can no longer lend our credibility to an organization that has lost its integrity,” write four scientists and administrators who recently resigned from the NIH.
www.statnews.com

I read this excellent book last year about the US coup in Guatemala. So much death and destruction built on lies.
"It might be easy to dismiss the idea of ISO 9001 as just another tool to encourage best practice among publishers. But journal certification would fill a long-standing gap in the chain of external oversight from conduct to translation of research."

@jabyrnesci.bsky.social writes in @nature.com !
Put pressure on publishers to follow best practice — external regulation is the answer
Journals that work hard to meet the needs of both authors and readers should be acknowledged publicly — encouraging others to follow suit.
doi.org

Swallowtail butterfly in my garden.

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

Are peer reviewers influenced by their work being cited?
Coercive citations
Reviewer citation requests can turn peer review into a transaction rather than an objective critique of the article.
buff.ly

Cycling in snow is joyous.

Reposted by Adrian Barnett

"How can funders avoid crossing the Szilard point?"

The Szilard point is "the threshold at which the total cost of competing for a grant equals (or surpasses) the value of the available funding."
Point of no returns: researchers are crossing a threshold in the fight for funding
With so little money to go round, the costs of competing for grants can exceed what the grants are worth. When that happens, nobody wins.
www.nature.com

Such important work. Thank you both for helping to eradicate fakes from the scientific record.

Holiday

Rather than investing in the energy that "will never kill us or never run out" (Will Self) our state government is pouring money into coal. A sad short-term gamble to win votes.

Was a preprint, now a paper. Our experiment on researchers preferences for published papers. Disappointingly, the journal impact factor still dominates, and even worse, some authors are willing to sacrifice their results for a higher impact factor. www.scienceopen.com/hosted-docum...

100%. If a study is beyond the capabilities of you and your team, then do a different study.

Reposted by Jan R. Boehnke

Are peer reviewers influenced by their work being cited? Version of record at
@elife.bsky.social. Thorough and useful peer review - who needs and impact factor?!

Links to paper and code/data ⬇️

📄https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/108748
💻https://github.com/agbarnett/cited_reviewers
elifesciences.org

Bloom

Cracked my car window 😒

At a repair cafe getting a music stand fixed and it is an absolute joy of positivity and community spirit.

It's been great to be part of something positive and new.