Inalienist
inalienist.bsky.social
Inalienist
@inalienist.bsky.social
YouTuber interested in politics, economics, political philosophy, political theory, ethical/moral philosophy

https://www.youtube.com/@inalienist
Comparing property rights reveals a starker contrast than wages, as workers as employees receive 0% claim to what they produce

“We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as
June 27, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Take the economic democracy pill
www.pbs.org/newshour/eco...
June 27, 2025 at 1:36 AM
The same inalienable rights arguments imply both as David Ellerman's philosophy illustrates
June 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Yes, if all firms were worker cooperatives, the economy would be democratic. Capitalism is a misnomer. The institution that determines capitalist property and labor relations isn’t private ownership of the means of production, but rather the employer-employee contract.
bsky.app/profile/inal...
June 17, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Worker control is compatible with private property in the means of production. It's based on the private property norm that people have an inalienable right to appropriate the positive and negative fruits of their labor. For instance, a worker coop can lease means of production from third parties.
June 17, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Capitalism’s employer-employee contract is inherently anti-democratic because it’s alienation-based, unlike delegation-based contracts that democracy favors. In an employment contract, the employer manages the firm in their own name, not as a delegate of the workers.
June 16, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Arguing in terms of property rights instead of value reveals a starker contrast. In property-theoretic terms, workers as employees get 0% of the positive and negative results of production while the employer gets 100% of that. This is known as the labor theory of PROPERTY.
Diagram by David Ellerman
June 12, 2025 at 8:45 PM
One major problem with utilitarianism is that it can't rule out a totalitarian society where people have been indoctrinated to prefer their oppression. Utilitarians, who see freedom as an instrumental end, aren't defenders of liberty
#Ethics #Philosophy #Economics #Capitalism #Utilitarian
June 11, 2025 at 6:29 PM
The attached diagram from David Ellerman explains the non-democratic tendencies of neoliberalism quite well. Ellerman’s work shows that the Enlightenment idea of inalienable rights is anti-capitalist and implies workers’ control over production.
March 30, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Employer-employee contracts have a moral inconsistency that can only be resolved by structuring all firms as worker cooperatives.

#Cooperatives #Labor #WorkerCoops #WorkerCooperatives #philosophy #ethics #capitalism #anticapitalism #leftism
March 26, 2025 at 9:19 PM
such as the idea that people have an inalienable right to appropriate the positive and negative fruits of their labor. This principle is violated in the employer-employee contract.

A free market economy of worker coops is perfectly compatible with limited government
March 26, 2025 at 5:56 AM
Liberalism being correct doesn't mean that history is over. There are still structural problems. This diagram hints at those.
March 23, 2025 at 3:39 PM
March 23, 2025 at 3:27 PM
March 22, 2025 at 2:43 PM
The norm that legal responsibility should be assigned to the de facto responsible party implies that workers ought to jointly appropriate the positive and negative results of production i.e. property rights to produced outputs and liabilities for used-up inputs.
March 22, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Capitalism's employer-employee contract is fundamentally a contract to alienate workers' self-management rights to the employer. Democratic theory tells us that only contracts based on delegation are valid.
March 15, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Contemporary liberalism has forgotten that traditional arguments for political democracy were not merely arguments for contract over coercion, but drew a further distinction in contracts between contracts based on consent to delegate and consent to alienate. Alienation-based contracts are invalid.
March 8, 2025 at 3:15 PM
The employer, an alien legal entity, rules the firm in their own name. They aren’t a delegate of the workers. You can’t name a single property right violated. The right to appropriate the fruits of your labor is clearly alienated though.
December 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM
Whoever is factually responsible should bear the legal responsibility. In other words, the workers should jointly legally own the whole (positive and negative) product. This contradicts the assignment in the employer-employee contract.

Responsibility can't be transferred even with consent.
December 10, 2024 at 7:21 AM
December 5, 2024 at 4:59 AM