There are so many more resources I can share on this that even a layperson could read and see how the Worthen piece is just plain bad in many spots but if you want to watch more, start here
youtu.be/pfSRhfk2Xlc?...

Direct Link (Use 🇨🇦 VPN) watch.globaltv.com/series/2893d...

you wouldn't want a story humanizing Venezuelan men at a time when the Trump administration is trying to enflame tensions to justify illegal militaristic pursuit of Venezuelan precious metal and oil resources, would you?

Of course you wouldn't

“One of the world's largest academic publishers is selling a book on the ethics of artificial intelligence research that appears to be riddled with fake citations, including references to journals that do not exist.”

[chef’s kiss (dot) gif]

If you didn't read it you don't cite it. It's simple enough.

If you cite a work, you're telling your reader that you've read it and verify that it says X. If you haven't read it, you're lying to your reader. Lying is bad. If you do it as a matter of practice, you're a liar. Liars cannot be trusted to convey knowledge.

This is the entire premise of our profession. You do due diligence. You take years to do the work. You *read the other works you are using*. We have been doing it for decades.