Reposted by Dervlyn
"Trans ideology" has all the same vibe (and venom) as "Gay Agenda" did and speaking as one of the gay kids at school at the precise time your paper backed the homophobic Keep the Clause campaign you have absolutely no leg to stand on suggesting you are somehow on our side now.
December 9, 2025 at 12:10 PM
"Trans ideology" has all the same vibe (and venom) as "Gay Agenda" did and speaking as one of the gay kids at school at the precise time your paper backed the homophobic Keep the Clause campaign you have absolutely no leg to stand on suggesting you are somehow on our side now.
Reposted by Dervlyn
Daily Record is using the same language and arguments as they did then, just for another group, ie treating them as a danger, brainwashing kids etc. I remember how homophobic Scotland was in the 90s and the Records KTC campaign felt like the last gasp of that. Sadly it’s reemerged as transphobia.
December 9, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Daily Record is using the same language and arguments as they did then, just for another group, ie treating them as a danger, brainwashing kids etc. I remember how homophobic Scotland was in the 90s and the Records KTC campaign felt like the last gasp of that. Sadly it’s reemerged as transphobia.
Reposted by Dervlyn
Really?
That's not what the tribunal found. Their ruling was that trans women are not prohibited from using women's changing rooms.
Also, the actual S Court judgement was far more nuanced than you are suggesting: including a stipulation that trans rights must also be protected.
That's not what the tribunal found. Their ruling was that trans women are not prohibited from using women's changing rooms.
Also, the actual S Court judgement was far more nuanced than you are suggesting: including a stipulation that trans rights must also be protected.
December 9, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Really?
That's not what the tribunal found. Their ruling was that trans women are not prohibited from using women's changing rooms.
Also, the actual S Court judgement was far more nuanced than you are suggesting: including a stipulation that trans rights must also be protected.
That's not what the tribunal found. Their ruling was that trans women are not prohibited from using women's changing rooms.
Also, the actual S Court judgement was far more nuanced than you are suggesting: including a stipulation that trans rights must also be protected.
You're supposed to be a journalist, not the labour party propagandist
March 11, 2025 at 11:35 AM
You're supposed to be a journalist, not the labour party propagandist