darthsamthewise.bsky.social
@darthsamthewise.bsky.social
Reposted
That’s what makes it the lib version
October 18, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Reposted
It's great Dem leaders are condemning the shooting.

What I would also like to hear from them is strong condemnation of all these calls of violence, and especially from Democratic governors, mayors, etc., that they will use all their powers against any action that may stem therefrom.
September 11, 2025 at 3:14 AM
Reposted
Group A: willing to vote to end democracy & a lot of other things that's good for the population as a whole.

Group B: tries to protect democracy & the population as a whole.

Group B has tried for years to be reasonable only for Group A to double down.

It's ok to no longer associate with Group A.
August 29, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Reposted
Texan here. I will not vote for any candidate from a party that thinks it is their right to choose their voters instead of the voters choosing their representatives. So straight blue until the map changes. Sorry @GOP
August 29, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Reposted
August 29, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Reposted
If you can keep fighting and escalating forever, you will win, or at least drag them down in the process.
August 28, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Reposted
The vital currency in all modern political disputes is the public's attention. The more you escalate a conflict, the more attention you get, and if you're in the superior, more defensible position - which may not be the most POPULAR position, at the outset - fighting it out wins people to your side.
August 28, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Reposted
The other thing is that if you have the morally, logically correct position in a conflict - or are simply standing up for a popular institution or a stable status quo - you should WANT to fight, as long as possible, in as large a public forum as possible, because that's how you persuade people.
August 28, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Reposted
Forcing them to fight for every inch - and escalating every conflict to the utmost - spends their time, their legal resources, and makes each subsequent battle RISKIER for them rather than SAFER, as you’re constantly testing public acquiescence and you never know when popular opposition might emerge
August 28, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Reposted
So much of their power flows from the way people quietly bow out of their way, forcing them to expend essentially no political capital to shred vital and popular institutions. And then, having done so, they look even stronger, and it’s even easier next time.
August 28, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Reposted
August 7, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Reposted
Tim Walz’s “we take care of people, dammit” and “JD fucks couches” was why I found him compelling. I’d like to get back to that energy.
July 27, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Reposted
"The problem with Democrats..."
July 27, 2025 at 2:49 PM