Chris Vagasky
@coweatherman.bsky.social
American Meteorologist
Blixtexperten
Weather Measurements Guy
Award-Winning Communicator
AMS Certified Digital Meteorologist #18
Blixtexperten
Weather Measurements Guy
Award-Winning Communicator
AMS Certified Digital Meteorologist #18
I don’t agree with Helene comment, but I don’t think he was going off of “hook = tornado”. I really think they misstated the tornado possible tag as “possible tornado signature” and apparently someone did report a tornado.
Can’t say why sheriff would authorize vs EM, but not a bad decision to me.
Can’t say why sheriff would authorize vs EM, but not a bad decision to me.
November 10, 2025 at 11:53 PM
I don’t agree with Helene comment, but I don’t think he was going off of “hook = tornado”. I really think they misstated the tornado possible tag as “possible tornado signature” and apparently someone did report a tornado.
Can’t say why sheriff would authorize vs EM, but not a bad decision to me.
Can’t say why sheriff would authorize vs EM, but not a bad decision to me.
I don’t think so. I think he misstated the tornado possible tag as “possible tornado signature” and someone reported a tornado (even though I don’t think there was one).
November 10, 2025 at 11:19 PM
I don’t think so. I think he misstated the tornado possible tag as “possible tornado signature” and someone reported a tornado (even though I don’t think there was one).
Tornado possible tag on the warning. I’m ok with this.
November 10, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Tornado possible tag on the warning. I’m ok with this.
Tornado possible tag on the warning. I’m ok with this.
November 10, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Tornado possible tag on the warning. I’m ok with this.
Can we get @dieworkwear.bsky.social to talk about the fit of that suit?
November 10, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Can we get @dieworkwear.bsky.social to talk about the fit of that suit?
The shading was based on the local forecast. The values are the 25-75 percentiles.
The communication value of that is 0.
The forecast was entirely dependent on how far inland the lake effect got.
The communication value of that is 0.
The forecast was entirely dependent on how far inland the lake effect got.
November 10, 2025 at 5:51 PM
The shading was based on the local forecast. The values are the 25-75 percentiles.
The communication value of that is 0.
The forecast was entirely dependent on how far inland the lake effect got.
The communication value of that is 0.
The forecast was entirely dependent on how far inland the lake effect got.
This came from using just NBM.
November 10, 2025 at 5:34 PM
This came from using just NBM.
What if the local office has a completely different idea of the long range forecast than WPC and there’s a discrepancy between what the forecast says and what the office wants to put in the forecast discussion?
November 10, 2025 at 5:29 PM
What if the local office has a completely different idea of the long range forecast than WPC and there’s a discrepancy between what the forecast says and what the office wants to put in the forecast discussion?
A lot of the offices apply local tweaks to NBM based on their knowledge and experiences.
I also hope that there doesn’t become a mandate of “you’re only to focus on days 1-3, so no forecast discussions beyond that”.
I also hope that there doesn’t become a mandate of “you’re only to focus on days 1-3, so no forecast discussions beyond that”.
November 10, 2025 at 5:18 PM
A lot of the offices apply local tweaks to NBM based on their knowledge and experiences.
I also hope that there doesn’t become a mandate of “you’re only to focus on days 1-3, so no forecast discussions beyond that”.
I also hope that there doesn’t become a mandate of “you’re only to focus on days 1-3, so no forecast discussions beyond that”.