Like, yeah, the US has a whole massive issue with coercive plea bargaining used to deter people from taking their charges to trial and all, but like, if we can manage to have trials for anyone who rejects a plea and still incarcerate people at the highest rate in the world, y'all have no excuse

See @cohodes.bsky.social recent work for empirical evidence… bsky.app/profile/coho...

Falkner IS that ignorant

the actual data tells us you'd have to have 300 happy transitiuoners for a detransitioner to be representative , and more like 1000 for it to represent peopel who detransitioned because they now consider themselves to solely their AGAB

I'm sure Dr Louise Irvine will find time to read:

www.mja.com.au/journal/2025...

'do not buy into gender ideology' = do not follow treatment protocols that have decades of good, actually strong evidence , because the mis representation of the evidence as 'weak' in Cass ignored the ethical issues of comparing effective treatments known to work with harmful quackery

this will be won in appeal and with the new evidence. We still hope to see the IP imprisoned for this, there is solid precedent for imprisonment for similar offences. The one before the court, was the most brutal and repugnant attack upon a dead trans girl and our funerary rights as a community

Chief Constable of GMP, a Christian-activist called Stephen Watson, had instructed his officers to not deal with any reports of online crimes motivated by hatred of trans people. No other minority group was singled out.
This, will paint an entirely new complexion on this case and we are confident

Now, the ‘amended grounds’ are very important. GMP gave around 13 rotten, pathetic, professionally embarrassing excuses not to deal with the complaint. The judicial review proceeded on that information.
However, Lynsay recently obtained an internal document from GMP, showing that for years, the

targeted by the IP were ordinary people absolutely grief-stricken at the loss of young Brianna. Your Ladyship, for you not to recognise that, you acted as a coward, or you are ‘Gender Critical’ yourself.
Anyone doing what the IP did, during a funerary remembrance, would end up in A&E.

‘political’ speech but personally targeted harassment at a time when our community was at its most grief-stricken. There is absolutely no protection from Art 10 ECtHR for harassment targeted at a persons protected characteristics. Take away Owen Jones and Jeremy Corbyn, the overwhelming majority

that the IP was engaging in speech that was political and aimed at well-known public figures.
This was not true your Ladyship, and you know that. He was targeting a great many ordinary people expressing profound grief during mourning of a young trans girl brutally murdered. This was not vague

for not taking any action against the IP after he engaged in the most grotesque targeted harassment of the late Brianna Ghey (RIP) and those mourning her passing.
He carried out this act over a couple of days literally when her body was still warm.
The Judge made a highly questionable decision

Majority of Mumsnetters definitely, of the larger population I doubt it, given in most surveys cis women are considerably more accepting of trans people than cis men