Bjorning
@bjorning.bsky.social
Software dev, gamer, Tolkien geek, liberal post-Zionist agnostic frum Jew, pro-regulated-markets progressive, bear lover, general weirdo, proud dad of 2.
Blocks people who follow without interacting first.
He/Him
Blocks people who follow without interacting first.
He/Him
Reposted by Bjorning
By all means, primary the cavers anyway, but you actually have to put forth a candidate to do that, not just imagine one into being.
November 11, 2025 at 7:14 PM
By all means, primary the cavers anyway, but you actually have to put forth a candidate to do that, not just imagine one into being.
Reposted by Bjorning
You're literally claiming a Nazi Tattoo is a "pirate tattoo" something tells me there's a different reason you want Democrats to lose.
LMAO AND HE'S CALLING IT A "PIRATE TATTOO"
Holy shit, actively *lying* about the Nazi Tattoo somehow makes the We Should Wreck Democrats rhetoric even worse.
bsky.app/profile/11th...
Holy shit, actively *lying* about the Nazi Tattoo somehow makes the We Should Wreck Democrats rhetoric even worse.
bsky.app/profile/11th...
November 11, 2025 at 2:56 PM
You're literally claiming a Nazi Tattoo is a "pirate tattoo" something tells me there's a different reason you want Democrats to lose.
Reposted by Bjorning
It is *not possible* to have pre-existing conditions protection without some sort of system like the ACA in place. i mean, technically it is, but you end up with obscene premiums that no one can pay (which is what’s happening now)
November 11, 2025 at 4:27 AM
It is *not possible* to have pre-existing conditions protection without some sort of system like the ACA in place. i mean, technically it is, but you end up with obscene premiums that no one can pay (which is what’s happening now)
Reposted by Bjorning
at the end of the day, market insurance cannot provide insurance for sick people. It isn’t because insurers are greedy (though they are); it’s because every insurer would go bankrupt.
November 11, 2025 at 4:24 AM
at the end of the day, market insurance cannot provide insurance for sick people. It isn’t because insurers are greedy (though they are); it’s because every insurer would go bankrupt.
Reposted by Bjorning
this is the thing every one of the 8 are taking huge amounts of heat and yet none of their offices have leaked "oh Schumer totally gave us a pass, please be mad at him not me!" because he didn't, because sometimes you just can't force Senators to do what you want.
November 11, 2025 at 1:39 AM
this is the thing every one of the 8 are taking huge amounts of heat and yet none of their offices have leaked "oh Schumer totally gave us a pass, please be mad at him not me!" because he didn't, because sometimes you just can't force Senators to do what you want.
Reposted by Bjorning
I think we should have continued! But I can't disregard the legitimate harms that route takes.
November 10, 2025 at 7:42 PM
I think we should have continued! But I can't disregard the legitimate harms that route takes.
Reposted by Bjorning
There's a lot of narritive-driven politics people fall into, and it will always slip down bad paths quickly. You don't have to like the deal. You can think the consequences are ultimately worthwhile. You don't have to fit it into some heroic narrative
November 10, 2025 at 7:40 PM
There's a lot of narritive-driven politics people fall into, and it will always slip down bad paths quickly. You don't have to like the deal. You can think the consequences are ultimately worthwhile. You don't have to fit it into some heroic narrative
Reposted by Bjorning
"Keep denying appropriations until either the Republican Party decides they like the ACA finally, or until the 120th Congress is sworn" doesn't meet that criteria
November 10, 2025 at 2:56 AM
"Keep denying appropriations until either the Republican Party decides they like the ACA finally, or until the 120th Congress is sworn" doesn't meet that criteria