Reposted by Alga Desmonte
Not real pleased to see one of the last trustworthy science communicators on the net say the hallucinating world burning false oracle might have a point.
Hell of a take from an ostensible climate defender, and makes me worry I can no longer take anything SciShow says at face value.
Hell of a take from an ostensible climate defender, and makes me worry I can no longer take anything SciShow says at face value.
April 24, 2025 at 3:05 AM
Not real pleased to see one of the last trustworthy science communicators on the net say the hallucinating world burning false oracle might have a point.
Hell of a take from an ostensible climate defender, and makes me worry I can no longer take anything SciShow says at face value.
Hell of a take from an ostensible climate defender, and makes me worry I can no longer take anything SciShow says at face value.
Reposted by Alga Desmonte
As a computer engineer that studied these in college and now refuses to touch them, they should have never left an academic setting. They aren't accurate enough for general usage and people assume whatever they say is correct because of bias for text that we THINK sounds like a human wrote it.
April 24, 2025 at 2:16 PM
As a computer engineer that studied these in college and now refuses to touch them, they should have never left an academic setting. They aren't accurate enough for general usage and people assume whatever they say is correct because of bias for text that we THINK sounds like a human wrote it.
Reposted by Alga Desmonte
If you’re a Democratic elected, work at some institution under assault, or (perhaps most of all) work in the press, and you find yourself thinking “Should I wait and see? Am I overreacting?” the answer is “This is what they’re counting on: you realizing you underreacted later.”
February 5, 2025 at 3:18 PM
If you’re a Democratic elected, work at some institution under assault, or (perhaps most of all) work in the press, and you find yourself thinking “Should I wait and see? Am I overreacting?” the answer is “This is what they’re counting on: you realizing you underreacted later.”
Reposted by Alga Desmonte
"As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is not democracy."
April 4, 2025 at 11:26 PM
"As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is not democracy."
Reposted by Alga Desmonte
Easy example because I'm an Orioles fan: O's owner Peter Angelos was never forgiven by the other owners for publicly refusing to hire scab players during the 1994-95 players strike. Shunned and fucked-over by the other owners and MLB front office until his death. That's class solidarity!
April 4, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Easy example because I'm an Orioles fan: O's owner Peter Angelos was never forgiven by the other owners for publicly refusing to hire scab players during the 1994-95 players strike. Shunned and fucked-over by the other owners and MLB front office until his death. That's class solidarity!
Reposted by Alga Desmonte
It is not and has never been about wealth or prosperity in an objective sense. It's about control of human beings and the wealthy have more control and power in a desperate, shrinking economy than they do in a prosperous and wealthy one.
April 4, 2025 at 10:41 PM
It is not and has never been about wealth or prosperity in an objective sense. It's about control of human beings and the wealthy have more control and power in a desperate, shrinking economy than they do in a prosperous and wealthy one.