I believe in kindness and interdependence.
I am passionate about learning and teaching simple and accessible practices that promote health.
The Simple Science of Wellness www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-simple...
also
my weekly free newsletter on simple health practices that move the needle: simple-science.beehiiv.com/subscribe
" I heard a bird congratulating itself all day for being a jay."
" I heard a bird congratulating itself all day for being a jay."
It is unfortunate that the present risk calculators do not incorporate high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
But patients should not get started on statins based on a single LDL number.
Accumulating evidence over the past 20 years shows that a biomarker called C-reactive protein – which signals the presence of low-grade inflammation – is a better predictor of risk for heart disease than cholesterol.
No pay wall.
It is unfortunate that the present risk calculators do not incorporate high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
But patients should not get started on statins based on a single LDL number.
That’s why the Drawdown Explorer calls these “Not Recommended” climate solutions.
That’s why the Drawdown Explorer calls these “Not Recommended” climate solutions.
"Why would I want to destroy something I love so much and then bring it inside to watch die?"
I can't do Christmas trees anymore!
Looking for more traditions, but starting with this one:
"Why would I want to destroy something I love so much and then bring it inside to watch die?"
I can't do Christmas trees anymore!
Looking for more traditions, but starting with this one:
yes, but they need ~30% more total protein
plant proteins have lower bioavailability—you need more volume to match the anabolic response
1.5-1.6 g/kg vegan with proper leucine = 1.0-1.2 g/kg omnivore outcomes
shorturl.at/LYWIN
yes, but they need ~30% more total protein
plant proteins have lower bioavailability—you need more volume to match the anabolic response
1.5-1.6 g/kg vegan with proper leucine = 1.0-1.2 g/kg omnivore outcomes
shorturl.at/LYWIN
not "a bit more"—literally 1.6-2.4 g/kg instead of 0.8-1.2 g/kg
one study: 40% calorie deficit + 2.4 g/kg protein = GAINED muscle while losing fat
1.2 g/kg group lost muscle despite eating "enough"
shorturl.at/LYWIN
not "a bit more"—literally 1.6-2.4 g/kg instead of 0.8-1.2 g/kg
one study: 40% calorie deficit + 2.4 g/kg protein = GAINED muscle while losing fat
1.2 g/kg group lost muscle despite eating "enough"
shorturl.at/LYWIN
active people need 0.8 g/kg protein to maintain muscle
sedentary people need MORE (1.6 g/kg) for the same result
exercise makes you 2x more efficient at using dietary protein
this is why online protein debates miss the point—context matters more than numbers
shorturl.at/LYWIN
active people need 0.8 g/kg protein to maintain muscle
sedentary people need MORE (1.6 g/kg) for the same result
exercise makes you 2x more efficient at using dietary protein
this is why online protein debates miss the point—context matters more than numbers
shorturl.at/LYWIN
muscle researchers: eat more protein
twist: they're both right
high protein in middle age → 4x cancer risk
high protein after 65 → lower mortality
same nutrient, opposite effects at different ages
nobody's explaining this
shorturl.at/LYWIN
muscle researchers: eat more protein
twist: they're both right
high protein in middle age → 4x cancer risk
high protein after 65 → lower mortality
same nutrient, opposite effects at different ages
nobody's explaining this
shorturl.at/LYWIN
shorturl.at/LYWIN
shorturl.at/LYWIN
Evidently due to waning immunity and not to a new variant.
I got my booster this past week. Found Novavax at Costco and decided not to delay.
christinapagel.substack.com/p/england-is...
Evidently due to waning immunity and not to a new variant.
I got my booster this past week. Found Novavax at Costco and decided not to delay.