Torlion Dragon
LightNews LightNews
banner
torlion.bsky.social
Torlion Dragon
@torlion.bsky.social
360 followers 1.2K following 2K posts
Sometimes I claim to be a dragon. Sometimes I claim to be a TF artist. One of these is more plausible than the other. He/Him Cis/Het/Ally #TFeveryday #TorlionArt
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
ruithesniffer.bsky.social
You should be careful when buying discount dino pants in the sketchy costumes shop

You never know when you could be turned into an inflatable dumb purple dino 🦖

Comm for @firr.bsky.social
January 25, 2026 at 12:47 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
baseball-broad.bsky.social
To delete your TikTok account without agreeing to the new TOS:

1) put your phone in airplane mode
2) open TikTok and go to your profile
3) go to settings and scroll down to delete account
4) turn airplane mode off
5) delete your account

Credit to @ kimsaira on instagram for this
January 24, 2026 at 5:59 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
billdraws.bsky.social
I know it isnt what the doctor ordered on the poll, but i have made this in the meantime .3.
January 23, 2026 at 6:49 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
clawtig.bsky.social
Wherever you are, I will be there, one way or another.

@mautsu.bsky.social

#tiger #mewtwo #furry #pokemon #commision #chilltime #furryfandom
January 23, 2026 at 7:13 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
profwolf.bsky.social
If you live in WA, and you follow me, you're probably going to want to tell your reps you're opposed to age gates and giving your real ID to some random "verification" company to view furry content.

Or queer content.

Or anything they deem "harmful to minors."
amras.me Amras, A Werewolf Story θ∆ @amras.me · 3d
Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.
I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque! Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.  Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to them—on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.—to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists. I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill. Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.
January 23, 2026 at 7:26 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
ironclaw99.bsky.social
Tell your fucking representatives to oppose KOSA, the SCREEN Act and the Sunset Section 230 Act.
dieselbrain.bsky.social Dieselbrain @dieselbrain.bsky.social · 4d
please keep contacting your representatives and demanding they oppose online censorship bills like KOSA, The Screen Act and advocate for the protection of section 230

www.congress.gov/members/find...
January 22, 2026 at 4:43 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
sumiaou.bsky.social
had an idea as good as it was specific — floral ornamentation on gargoyle bodies
October 25, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
geneljumalon.bsky.social
For those actively protesting or in danger of ICE raids, please save this red card. These are your constitutional rights. Weaponize these rights.
You have constitutional rights: -DO NOT OPEN THE DOOR if an immigration agent is knocking on the door. -DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS from an immigration agent if they try to talk to you. You have the right to remain silent. -DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING without first speaking to a lawyer. You have the right to speak with a lawyer. -If you are outside of your home, ask the agent if you are free to leave and if they say yes, leave calmy. -GIVE THIS CARD TO THE AGENT. If you are inside of your home, show the card through the window or slide it under the door. I do not wish to speak with you, answer your questions, or sign or hand you any documents based on my 5th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. I do not give you permission to enter my home based on my 4th Amendment rights under the United States Constitution unless you have a warrant to enter, signed by a judge or magistrate with my name on it that you slide under the door. I do not give you permission to search any of my belongings based on my 4th Amendment rights. I choose to exercise my constitutional rights. These cards are available to citizens and noncitizens alike.
January 22, 2026 at 4:07 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
azeldraws.bsky.social
Washington- they’re trying the internet age restriction stuff here. Do you want to give up *your* privacy because someone else can’t properly parent *their* children? Comment, call, don’t let it pass!
amras.me Amras, A Werewolf Story θ∆ @amras.me · 3d
Do you live in Washington State?

I need you to do two things:

1) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?...) & read HB 2112.
2) Go here (app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/2112) & leave a comment urging your representatives to vote AGAINST the bill.

This is SERIOUS shit. Please!

My comment in the BLUE images.
I write to you today to STRONGLY OPPOSE House Bill 2112 (2026) and urge you to vote against this measure in your assembly. While I appreciate the impetus behind the Bill, it will not accomplish its goals and will only serve to criminalize speech which is protected by the United States Constitution. Firstly, and foremost, it is the responsibility of parents to police the actions of their children, to prevent them from accessing objectionable content online, and protect them from harm. This is a PARENTING PROBLEM and nearly every internet enabled hardware device comes with built-in content controls ("Parental Controls") designed to accomplish this level of content filtering and control. The legislature should not be imposing regulation on private individuals—the adults legally accessing the "objectionable content" defined in HB2112—to address a parenting problem. Encourage parents to be more involved and engaged in their children's lives, to employ the tools available to them, and to restrict access to devices and internet access inappropriate for their children. Secondly, imposing compliance with age verification software on all Internet sites that display images defined within the Bill is a fundamental invasion of privacy. While Section 2.2 states that identifying information may not be retained, that simply isn't practical and, if audited by the State, presents logistical challenges for said verifiers. The verification process would also create a "paper trail" through computer log data with which the State could potentially link verification queries with individuals and sites, building profiles on individuals, which is inappropriate and grotesque! Thirdly, Section 1.7(c) of the Bill is ambiguous and subjective, without exception for amateur expression. Who is to say what works of art, by which artists, is of merit? Who will be the arbiter of "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value"? This is not a sufficient definition of acceptability. It's dangerous, McCarthy-esque language.  Look, I'm sure you're getting a lot of these messages right now, and I appreciate that your staff is busy and possibly overwhelmed with work. This is a bad bill that will not accomplish its objectives of making the internet safer for children. The reality is that the internet is not a safe place for children to spend time unsupervised and without content restrictions. Parents need to use the tools available to them—on their children's devices, laptops, home wifi routers, etc.—to make the content restrictions necessary to protect their children as they see fit. It is not the place of the Legislature to impose mass content restriction on everyone "for the children" when the solution is far simpler and already exists. I sincerely urge you to vote against this bill. Thank you for your service to your communities and the State of Washington.
January 23, 2026 at 1:49 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
lilcupid.bsky.social
I had to get it out,,, dumb puppy drone,,, 😵‍💫

#latex | #latexfur | #drone | #wip
A character of unspecified gender in a full suit of latex. It is anthro in appearance with blue accents.
January 23, 2026 at 12:14 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
kaizer33226.bsky.social
And to finish up today, Have a bunbun showing how stretchy one of their "holes" can be ^^

#Bunbun #Latex #NSFW #KaizerArt #VoidArt
January 22, 2026 at 1:43 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
amaterasu-mono.bsky.social
🐈‍⬛🥛
#TFSky #transfur
March 11, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
esmeweatherwax8.bsky.social
Gentleness doesn't mean you're not strong. It simply means your strength doesn't harm others. Star Trek Lower Decks quote
January 21, 2026 at 12:40 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
redflare500.bsky.social
Rouge the Cat (woman)
January 22, 2026 at 7:11 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
recurrent.bsky.social
Looking to set up a Group Character TF for Street Sharks! @pheagleadler.bsky.social has already claimed TFing into Streex but we are looking for other to TF into Ripster, Jab, Big Slammi and other characters. Please reply if you'd like to join in.
a cartoon of a shark with the words brainbustaahhh on the bottom right
ALT: a cartoon of a shark with the words brainbustaahhh on the bottom right
media.tenor.com
January 22, 2026 at 6:54 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
helixdoes.art
A pic for charismaticbard and od. I am in the shortstack mood again now.
January 16, 2026 at 9:08 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
diablomusica.bsky.social
Reminder, call your Reps and Senators!
Remind them we don't need this shit. This has ZERO to do about protection, it's about control.

Also, parents need to get off their asses and PARENT THIER KIDS. Get parental blocks like mine did for phones & devices. It's not that fucking hard. Jesus...
January 21, 2026 at 7:24 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
samagthrav2.bsky.social
🐉🏴‍☠️
December 7, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
samagthrav2.bsky.social
Paws booty and tent, what's not to like for a space pirate? ;>
December 8, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
samagthrav2.bsky.social
Chozo built different :' D
December 8, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
driveljam.bsky.social
Mewtwo- Containment Breach?
I had a lot of fun drawing this one.

#Artist #CanadianArtist #Pokemon #Mewtwo
A digital illustration of the artificial life form Mewtwo, from Pokémon. It is sealed in a claustrophobic laboratory container and has tubes attached to his body in several places. The container is full of a sickly green fluid. It faces the point of view with its tail curled up, head angled down, legs up and its arms raised over each other. Its eyes flash with bright blue psychic energy, and a crack can be seen spanning across the glass.
January 21, 2026 at 12:48 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
darriengamefox.bsky.social
Normalize poisoning generative AI.
January 21, 2026 at 7:02 PM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
swatcher.bsky.social
I can be your canvas #swatchertv
January 21, 2026 at 4:56 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
roricomics.bsky.social
Lil' comic about hope and longing 💗
comic: when it happens I hope people ring bells and blow horns. if I'm asleep I hope to be woken. I won't mind. if I'm in traffic I hope to see revelers. If it causes a traffic jam I won't mind. I don't want to exist a moment not knowing that it has happened.
January 21, 2026 at 6:11 AM
Reposted by Torlion Dragon
redmidibazaar.bsky.social
washington buddies, they're tryin to get us this time. let's destroy this bill.
January 11, 2026 at 4:12 PM