Defender of clowns.
Older than you think.
(he/they)
⚡
www.goodreads.com/book/show/79...
www.goodreads.com/book/show/79...
I don't mind so much, since I try to do it at 7:00 AM on Sundays.
I don't mind so much, since I try to do it at 7:00 AM on Sundays.
bsky.app/profile/tgoe...
A Drop of Corruption, the next book in Robert Jackson Bennett's Shadow of the Leviathan series.
The Twelve Houses series by Sharon Shinn.
The Rook and Rose series by M.A. Carrick (pseudonym for Marie Brendan and Alyc Helms)
bsky.app/profile/tgoe...
I am, BTW, completely willing to accept arguments that the answer is "None, and we should stop teaching them."
I am, BTW, completely willing to accept arguments that the answer is "None, and we should stop teaching them."
The only obvious one I can think of is when converting from phase to orthogonal sum.
The only obvious one I can think of is when converting from phase to orthogonal sum.
Royal Gambit (the latest in the Chequey series) by Daniel O'Malley
The Tuyo series by Rachel Neumeier which I am savoring and drawing out because I don't want it to end.
And finally, the very healing (for me) Snake Eater by T Kingfisher.
Royal Gambit (the latest in the Chequey series) by Daniel O'Malley
The Tuyo series by Rachel Neumeier which I am savoring and drawing out because I don't want it to end.
And finally, the very healing (for me) Snake Eater by T Kingfisher.
A Drop of Corruption, the next book in Robert Jackson Bennett's Shadow of the Leviathan series.
The Twelve Houses series by Sharon Shinn.
The Rook and Rose series by M.A. Carrick (pseudonym for Marie Brendan and Alyc Helms)
A Drop of Corruption, the next book in Robert Jackson Bennett's Shadow of the Leviathan series.
The Twelve Houses series by Sharon Shinn.
The Rook and Rose series by M.A. Carrick (pseudonym for Marie Brendan and Alyc Helms)
I'm not sure it was, but only because I've enjoyed so much of what I've read this year.
I'm not sure it was, but only because I've enjoyed so much of what I've read this year.
It depends on what learning you want them to demonstrate. But it's pretty clear to me that they understand the importance of both denominator (having found a common one) and the numerator. To that end, I'd say they've demonstrated proficiency in analyzing fractions.
It depends on what learning you want them to demonstrate. But it's pretty clear to me that they understand the importance of both denominator (having found a common one) and the numerator. To that end, I'd say they've demonstrated proficiency in analyzing fractions.
www.desmos.com/calculator/e...
www.desmos.com/calculator/e...
Going to octonions costs you associativity.
Going to octonions costs you associativity.