Tanrenzu
@tanrenzu.bsky.social
‘I don’t feel like writing what I have just written, nor do I feel like erasing it.’ —Kierkegaard
Reposted by Tanrenzu
MTG: “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end.
Boy were we wrong.”
Boy were we wrong.”
January 3, 2026 at 4:28 PM
MTG: “This is what many in MAGA thought they voted to end.
Boy were we wrong.”
Boy were we wrong.”
Reposted by Tanrenzu
“Housing shortage – Jews to blame," letter sticker, German Reich, 1938
zwangsraeume.berlin/en/context
zwangsraeume.berlin/en/context
November 14, 2025 at 2:16 AM
“Housing shortage – Jews to blame," letter sticker, German Reich, 1938
zwangsraeume.berlin/en/context
zwangsraeume.berlin/en/context
no, @mozilla.org you’re indeed building an agenda, and it’s not even an original, but one copied from others.
i would love to know where you see all that promise in AI other than your pockets, and where you see that the AI is not itself the “disruption that breaks [your user’s] flow”
i would love to know where you see all that promise in AI other than your pockets, and where you see that the AI is not itself the “disruption that breaks [your user’s] flow”
November 14, 2025 at 6:17 PM
no, @mozilla.org you’re indeed building an agenda, and it’s not even an original, but one copied from others.
i would love to know where you see all that promise in AI other than your pockets, and where you see that the AI is not itself the “disruption that breaks [your user’s] flow”
i would love to know where you see all that promise in AI other than your pockets, and where you see that the AI is not itself the “disruption that breaks [your user’s] flow”
Reposted by Tanrenzu
True comedy is watching Dave Portnay trying to use a hammer
November 14, 2025 at 5:42 AM
True comedy is watching Dave Portnay trying to use a hammer
“Grab him by the list…”
Rep. Lauren Boebert says that there is “NO WAY” she will take her name off the Epstein files discharge petition.
President Trump and his administration are pressuring her to remove her name.
Via Manu Raju
President Trump and his administration are pressuring her to remove her name.
Via Manu Raju
November 13, 2025 at 2:51 PM
“Grab him by the list…”
Isn’t the “Hitler sucks” wing the one Trump is demolishing?
Cool. What would you call the other wing then? www.nytimes.com/2025/11/03/u...
November 6, 2025 at 4:11 PM
Isn’t the “Hitler sucks” wing the one Trump is demolishing?
Reposted by Tanrenzu
Last year, CNN ran a “fact check” of Kamala HQ that claimed we were lying for saying Trump’s plan is Project 2025.
Now Trump is outright admitting it’s his plan.
Legacy media failed the country.
Now Trump is outright admitting it’s his plan.
Legacy media failed the country.
October 2, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Last year, CNN ran a “fact check” of Kamala HQ that claimed we were lying for saying Trump’s plan is Project 2025.
Now Trump is outright admitting it’s his plan.
Legacy media failed the country.
Now Trump is outright admitting it’s his plan.
Legacy media failed the country.
Reposted by Tanrenzu
During the removal, parts of the statue were broken and President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s hands were no longer joined. But the statue appeared fully restored on Thursday, with only minor damage and the hands once again clasped together. https://wapo.st/3VMSCKU
October 3, 2025 at 2:30 AM
During the removal, parts of the statue were broken and President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s hands were no longer joined. But the statue appeared fully restored on Thursday, with only minor damage and the hands once again clasped together. https://wapo.st/3VMSCKU
Reposted by Tanrenzu
Though the only reason we are here is because senators, including some in that room, voted to confirm him despite his anti-science record and his admission that a worm ate part of his brain. My anger at that is limitless.
September 4, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Though the only reason we are here is because senators, including some in that room, voted to confirm him despite his anti-science record and his admission that a worm ate part of his brain. My anger at that is limitless.
they want to specifically kill some (many) of us because they think america doesn’t have enough future resources for all. it’s all the making of FAIR, those who are now part of the Project 2025
it’s here in the very first paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federat...
it’s here in the very first paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federat...
Federation for American Immigration Reform - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
September 1, 2025 at 2:22 PM
they want to specifically kill some (many) of us because they think america doesn’t have enough future resources for all. it’s all the making of FAIR, those who are now part of the Project 2025
it’s here in the very first paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federat...
it’s here in the very first paragraph: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federat...
it was retitled that in 1981, so the one #1 in ‘77 was STAR WARS and he’s right and they’re not!
August 15, 2025 at 12:57 AM
it was retitled that in 1981, so the one #1 in ‘77 was STAR WARS and he’s right and they’re not!
indeed, it’s all in good old Godhardt's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"
August 11, 2025 at 4:47 PM
indeed, it’s all in good old Godhardt's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"
exactly. they’re like “personas” were supposed to be: a tool to keep the attention on the right place—users.
August 11, 2025 at 4:44 PM
exactly. they’re like “personas” were supposed to be: a tool to keep the attention on the right place—users.
sorry, i did not mean it to be about the framework.
it’s always about the team. a great team with good guardrails and good objectives will do wonders with prob any framework, and a misguided team with short-term, tactical minds will wreck it even with a good one.
it’s not the framework.
it’s always about the team. a great team with good guardrails and good objectives will do wonders with prob any framework, and a misguided team with short-term, tactical minds will wreck it even with a good one.
it’s not the framework.
August 11, 2025 at 4:43 PM
sorry, i did not mean it to be about the framework.
it’s always about the team. a great team with good guardrails and good objectives will do wonders with prob any framework, and a misguided team with short-term, tactical minds will wreck it even with a good one.
it’s not the framework.
it’s always about the team. a great team with good guardrails and good objectives will do wonders with prob any framework, and a misguided team with short-term, tactical minds will wreck it even with a good one.
it’s not the framework.
“if you say you understand economics, and you’re not a socialist, you haven’t understood economics”
— Someone smarter than I, somewhere.
— Someone smarter than I, somewhere.
August 9, 2025 at 7:19 PM
“if you say you understand economics, and you’re not a socialist, you haven’t understood economics”
— Someone smarter than I, somewhere.
— Someone smarter than I, somewhere.
yes, i see your point, and it’s a valid one. and i also think that if everyone make it their job to have a better product, from research to qa, it is much less probable that these mistakes get to the light, and also more probable that the product/service is the best it can be.
August 9, 2025 at 2:07 PM
yes, i see your point, and it’s a valid one. and i also think that if everyone make it their job to have a better product, from research to qa, it is much less probable that these mistakes get to the light, and also more probable that the product/service is the best it can be.
in my experience, teams that end up effectively applying any sort of framework like these also have a solid or evolving set of product values that support a good interpretation of the results in context—specifically not letting it go rotten by the metric becoming the goal.
/4
/4
August 9, 2025 at 1:54 PM
in my experience, teams that end up effectively applying any sort of framework like these also have a solid or evolving set of product values that support a good interpretation of the results in context—specifically not letting it go rotten by the metric becoming the goal.
/4
/4
it also—like most measurable frameworks—might backfire by putting attention on the metric, while taking it from the user. not for nothing we have heaps of products with toxic addictiveness (Engagement), a pervasive focus on design systems and cute UI (Happiness)…
/3
/3
August 9, 2025 at 1:52 PM
it also—like most measurable frameworks—might backfire by putting attention on the metric, while taking it from the user. not for nothing we have heaps of products with toxic addictiveness (Engagement), a pervasive focus on design systems and cute UI (Happiness)…
/3
/3
so they give you a sense of righteousness only because some users align with your offer but usually hinders you from knowing more on how your offer could better align to to your user needs
/2
/2
August 9, 2025 at 1:45 PM
so they give you a sense of righteousness only because some users align with your offer but usually hinders you from knowing more on how your offer could better align to to your user needs
/2
/2
now talking seriously, the issues i found is that these methods measure the experience your current users get from your offer (product/service), but they hide the delta between your offer and the user needs
/1
/1
August 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM
now talking seriously, the issues i found is that these methods measure the experience your current users get from your offer (product/service), but they hide the delta between your offer and the user needs
/1
/1
considering that in common law, the body of law is defined by precedent derived from judicial decisions, aren’t then the judges who create the laws by interpreting acts and preceding future rulings?
don’t we then have only two powers, with the “legislative” being just a group of “influencers”?
don’t we then have only two powers, with the “legislative” being just a group of “influencers”?
August 8, 2025 at 1:01 PM
considering that in common law, the body of law is defined by precedent derived from judicial decisions, aren’t then the judges who create the laws by interpreting acts and preceding future rulings?
don’t we then have only two powers, with the “legislative” being just a group of “influencers”?
don’t we then have only two powers, with the “legislative” being just a group of “influencers”?