First: when we're talking about AI, it's a mistake to lead with the environmental impact.
It's a bad frame, bc it implies that if the numbers were different, it would be ok. But it wouldn't.
i went long on the conversation around AI and water, and how it's actually about what we want resources to be used for:
First: when we're talking about AI, it's a mistake to lead with the environmental impact.
It's a bad frame, bc it implies that if the numbers were different, it would be ok. But it wouldn't.
So laws get written incredibly broadly to compensate, and what's "bad" becomes what's "bad" in the subjective eyes of a bureaucrat ... or bank.
Guess who gets screwed.
So laws get written incredibly broadly to compensate, and what's "bad" becomes what's "bad" in the subjective eyes of a bureaucrat ... or bank.
Guess who gets screwed.
From now until the end of year, you can get Machines of Consent for $1!
itch.io/s/173321/tfr...
From now until the end of year, you can get Machines of Consent for $1!
itch.io/s/173321/tfr...
the audience, voting with their eyeballs: bring us more gay hockey sex
the audience, voting with their eyeballs: bring us more gay hockey sex
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
scz.org/blog/the-rea...
scz.org/blog/the-rea...
Remind me again. Who is in favour of fossil fuels?
Remind me again. Who is in favour of fossil fuels?