Or maybe more accurately Goldhagen vs. Everyone
Oh come on.
These guys are not conscripts, there is no commissar with a pistol behind them looking for signs of wavering.
They can just quit at any time! They can quit today. They can quit tomorrow.
prospect.org/2026/01/19/a...
Or maybe more accurately Goldhagen vs. Everyone
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
If you haven't read the Iliad, wtf are you doing with your life? It's all kinds of excellent.
If you don't want to *read* read it, download any one of a hundred free audiobooks of the thing. It's great!
There was a paper that explained missing data mechanism w/ DAGs, showing they're equivalent to conditioning on collider &/or ignoring confounding..
It was a simple paper for dummies (like me!) but earching for papers I've only found scary c-DAG and m-DAG stuff...😨
There was a paper that explained missing data mechanism w/ DAGs, showing they're equivalent to conditioning on collider &/or ignoring confounding..
It was a simple paper for dummies (like me!) but earching for papers I've only found scary c-DAG and m-DAG stuff...😨
The answer may surprise you
The answer may surprise you
Me, a hater: "profit is a bad metric for AGI because B2B SaaS against increasingly commoditized substitutes is not likely to stay profitable for long"
Everyone believes that they're the one immune to propaganda
#R #Rstats #stats
stackoverflow.com/questions/79...
#R #Rstats #stats
stackoverflow.com/questions/79...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s...
Nonetheless, some of the change is real.
via The Economist
Nonetheless, some of the change is real.
As a guide to life, it is a collection of fortune-cookie wisdom.
As a guide to life, it is a collection of fortune-cookie wisdom.
Even if its ideas were bad - and they're not - you'd need it simply for the vocabulary it provides.