Phoukaco
@phoukaco.bsky.social
Newly-minted historian and archaeologist, former software developer, fan of bad sci-fi movies, somewhat competent gamer, voracious reader, and dedicated traveler. I love dogs, too.
Reposted by Phoukaco
If ICE is uncomfortable with public oversight during large-scale sweeps, the issue is not the cameras, it’s the conduct they don’t want seen.
November 22, 2025 at 11:19 PM
If ICE is uncomfortable with public oversight during large-scale sweeps, the issue is not the cameras, it’s the conduct they don’t want seen.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Q: What happens if Zelensky doesn't agree to your peace plan?
Trump: Then he can continue to fight his little heart out.
Disgusting
Trump: Then he can continue to fight his little heart out.
Disgusting
November 22, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Q: What happens if Zelensky doesn't agree to your peace plan?
Trump: Then he can continue to fight his little heart out.
Disgusting
Trump: Then he can continue to fight his little heart out.
Disgusting
Reposted by Phoukaco
Vaccines DO NOT cause autism - there is extensive research showing this. Resurrecting old, discredited, fraudulent work is shameful.
Vaccine-preventable illnesses are serious - this is going to cause real harms.
This is dangerous & disappointing.
Vaccine-preventable illnesses are serious - this is going to cause real harms.
This is dangerous & disappointing.
November 21, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Vaccines DO NOT cause autism - there is extensive research showing this. Resurrecting old, discredited, fraudulent work is shameful.
Vaccine-preventable illnesses are serious - this is going to cause real harms.
This is dangerous & disappointing.
Vaccine-preventable illnesses are serious - this is going to cause real harms.
This is dangerous & disappointing.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Interesting. Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers says she will plead the fifth if forced to testify to Congress. But she willingly sat down with Todd Blanche? What a load of horseshit. www.politico.com/live-updates...
Ghislaine Maxwell will plead Fifth in House Epstein probe, Comer says
The late sex offender's convicted co-conspirator has been subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee.
www.politico.com
November 21, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Interesting. Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers says she will plead the fifth if forced to testify to Congress. But she willingly sat down with Todd Blanche? What a load of horseshit. www.politico.com/live-updates...
Reposted by Phoukaco
Today Donald Trump saved us from some of the tariffs he put in place, in order to bring down the price of groceries he said never went up.
November 17, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Today Donald Trump saved us from some of the tariffs he put in place, in order to bring down the price of groceries he said never went up.
Reposted by Phoukaco
New information here on how Trump has turned the Department of Justice—which is supposed to work on your behalf—into his own personal law firm, punishing his enemies and rewarding his friends.
"Worse than Watergate" doesn't begin to cover it. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
"Worse than Watergate" doesn't begin to cover it. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
60 Attorneys on the Year of Chaos Inside Trump’s Justice Department (Gift Article)
Sixty former staffers describe an environment of suspicion and intimidation within the nation’s most powerful law enforcement agency.
www.nytimes.com
November 17, 2025 at 5:23 PM
New information here on how Trump has turned the Department of Justice—which is supposed to work on your behalf—into his own personal law firm, punishing his enemies and rewarding his friends.
"Worse than Watergate" doesn't begin to cover it. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
"Worse than Watergate" doesn't begin to cover it. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Reposted by Phoukaco
Trump is transactional. He knows being nicer to Mamdani will help him with his business deals as a New Yorker. He also knows Mamdani is very popular. So, he puts on this charm offensive.
It isn't lost on many that he's warmer to Mamdani than Schumer, Jeffries, or the Democratic establishment.
It isn't lost on many that he's warmer to Mamdani than Schumer, Jeffries, or the Democratic establishment.
November 21, 2025 at 9:56 PM
Trump is transactional. He knows being nicer to Mamdani will help him with his business deals as a New Yorker. He also knows Mamdani is very popular. So, he puts on this charm offensive.
It isn't lost on many that he's warmer to Mamdani than Schumer, Jeffries, or the Democratic establishment.
It isn't lost on many that he's warmer to Mamdani than Schumer, Jeffries, or the Democratic establishment.
I understand we've reached the part of the dictatorship where they are telling us that "if the president gives the order, it is legal".
Yeah, that's gone well in the past. We are so far past time to remove him.
Yeah, that's gone well in the past. We are so far past time to remove him.
November 21, 2025 at 6:35 PM
I understand we've reached the part of the dictatorship where they are telling us that "if the president gives the order, it is legal".
Yeah, that's gone well in the past. We are so far past time to remove him.
Yeah, that's gone well in the past. We are so far past time to remove him.
Reposted by Phoukaco
The Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas and nooses as hate symbols.
This action, coupled with the President's call to hang Democratic members of Congress - both in the past few hrs - are more than "potentially divisive."
They are vile, unconscionable, and dangerous.
This action, coupled with the President's call to hang Democratic members of Congress - both in the past few hrs - are more than "potentially divisive."
They are vile, unconscionable, and dangerous.
November 20, 2025 at 9:29 PM
The Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas and nooses as hate symbols.
This action, coupled with the President's call to hang Democratic members of Congress - both in the past few hrs - are more than "potentially divisive."
They are vile, unconscionable, and dangerous.
This action, coupled with the President's call to hang Democratic members of Congress - both in the past few hrs - are more than "potentially divisive."
They are vile, unconscionable, and dangerous.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Grok is “my chatbot must tell everyone that I am better in any every way than LeBron, Schwarzenegger, and Jesus” the saddest thing anyone has ever done?
November 21, 2025 at 2:13 AM
Grok is “my chatbot must tell everyone that I am better in any every way than LeBron, Schwarzenegger, and Jesus” the saddest thing anyone has ever done?
Any normal person would be embarrassed that their chatbot had turned into a slavering simp.
November 21, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Any normal person would be embarrassed that their chatbot had turned into a slavering simp.
Reposted by Phoukaco
President Trump claimed Walmart conducted an "inclusive study" that showed the price of a Thanksgiving dinner dropped 25% since last year. Jason Chaffetz repeated this false claim two days later on The Ingraham Angle - Food prices actually rose from last year - I provide receipts
November 19, 2025 at 8:17 AM
President Trump claimed Walmart conducted an "inclusive study" that showed the price of a Thanksgiving dinner dropped 25% since last year. Jason Chaffetz repeated this false claim two days later on The Ingraham Angle - Food prices actually rose from last year - I provide receipts
Reposted by Phoukaco
We need to tell our non-scientist people that the CDC is no longer a trusted source of information.
I follow mostly scientists here and we’re all right on top of what’s going on at federal agencies but I wouldn’t take it for granted that lay people have the same awareness.
I follow mostly scientists here and we’re all right on top of what’s going on at federal agencies but I wouldn’t take it for granted that lay people have the same awareness.
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention webpage that previously stated "Vaccines do not cause autism" has been changed to cast doubt on the scientific research that supports the finding. n.pr/4oiyHPO
The CDC revives debunked 'link' between childhood vaccines and autism
A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention webpage that previously stated "Vaccines do not cause autism" has been changed to cast doubt on the scientific research that supports the finding.
n.pr
November 20, 2025 at 6:27 PM
We need to tell our non-scientist people that the CDC is no longer a trusted source of information.
I follow mostly scientists here and we’re all right on top of what’s going on at federal agencies but I wouldn’t take it for granted that lay people have the same awareness.
I follow mostly scientists here and we’re all right on top of what’s going on at federal agencies but I wouldn’t take it for granted that lay people have the same awareness.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Meiselas: This guy's a con artist. He's a fraud. He's quite literally a criminal. A felon. He lies. He destroys people's lives. He's a rug puller. 'Look, $23 trillion! Dividend checks are right around the corner! I'm gonna make you so rich!'
It is demented and it is manipulative and it is abusive.
It is demented and it is manipulative and it is abusive.
November 21, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Meiselas: This guy's a con artist. He's a fraud. He's quite literally a criminal. A felon. He lies. He destroys people's lives. He's a rug puller. 'Look, $23 trillion! Dividend checks are right around the corner! I'm gonna make you so rich!'
It is demented and it is manipulative and it is abusive.
It is demented and it is manipulative and it is abusive.
Reposted by Phoukaco
To put a finer point on it: An "illegal order" is one that violates their oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
If you think that upholding the Constitution = sedition, well...you do the math.
If you think that upholding the Constitution = sedition, well...you do the math.
Them: “You don’t have to obey illegal orders.”
Him: “That’s seditious! They should be hanged!”
Definitely not beating the giving-illegal-orders allegations.
Him: “That’s seditious! They should be hanged!”
Definitely not beating the giving-illegal-orders allegations.
November 21, 2025 at 2:55 AM
To put a finer point on it: An "illegal order" is one that violates their oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
If you think that upholding the Constitution = sedition, well...you do the math.
If you think that upholding the Constitution = sedition, well...you do the math.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Not that he cares about facts, but 92% of Medicaid recipients are working or fall within an exempt category, and thanks to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act (🤮), immigrants generally have to wait 5 years to enroll in Medicaid.
RFK Jr. is making shit up.
RFK Jr. is making shit up.
Secretary Kennedy, speaking to a bipartisan group of governors, has mixed up Medicare and Medicaid, and implied the people who will lose the latter are either unauthorized immigrants, dual eligible, or people who “don’t want to get a job.”
November 21, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Not that he cares about facts, but 92% of Medicaid recipients are working or fall within an exempt category, and thanks to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act (🤮), immigrants generally have to wait 5 years to enroll in Medicaid.
RFK Jr. is making shit up.
RFK Jr. is making shit up.
Reposted by Phoukaco
REPORTER: “Trump accused the other side of encouraging political violence. Isn't that what he is doing?”
LEAVITT: “Why aren't you talking about what members of congress are doing telling the military not to follow lawful orders?”
REPORTER: “Actually, they said ILLEGAL orders.”
LEAVITT: “Why aren't you talking about what members of congress are doing telling the military not to follow lawful orders?”
REPORTER: “Actually, they said ILLEGAL orders.”
November 20, 2025 at 8:05 PM
REPORTER: “Trump accused the other side of encouraging political violence. Isn't that what he is doing?”
LEAVITT: “Why aren't you talking about what members of congress are doing telling the military not to follow lawful orders?”
REPORTER: “Actually, they said ILLEGAL orders.”
LEAVITT: “Why aren't you talking about what members of congress are doing telling the military not to follow lawful orders?”
REPORTER: “Actually, they said ILLEGAL orders.”
Not if the orders were illegal. Not if they were being directed to break the law. They are REQUIRED to disobey illegal orders.
And so many of Trump's orders are illegal. Soo many.
And so many of Trump's orders are illegal. Soo many.
Leavitt: “If this were Republican members of Congress who were encouraging members of the military and members of our United States government to defy orders from the president and from the chain of command, this entire room would be up in arms.”
November 21, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Not if the orders were illegal. Not if they were being directed to break the law. They are REQUIRED to disobey illegal orders.
And so many of Trump's orders are illegal. Soo many.
And so many of Trump's orders are illegal. Soo many.
Reposted by Phoukaco
"Kids will get sick because of what the CDC just did. Some of them will die. But the even bigger story is that the U.S. government is no longer a reliable source of information." Trump's messes can be fixed; maybe not this man's.
Today's Triad from @jvl.bsky.social:
Today's Triad from @jvl.bsky.social:
What If the Most Dangerous Man in the Administration Isn’t Donald Trump?
The U.S. government is now pushing misinformation.
www.thebulwark.com
November 20, 2025 at 6:11 PM
"Kids will get sick because of what the CDC just did. Some of them will die. But the even bigger story is that the U.S. government is no longer a reliable source of information." Trump's messes can be fixed; maybe not this man's.
Today's Triad from @jvl.bsky.social:
Today's Triad from @jvl.bsky.social:
Reposted by Phoukaco
It certainly appears that the United States government is run by neo-Nazis.
Exclusive: The U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify the swastika, nooses and the Confederate flag as hate symbols.
The military service drafted a new policy that classifies them as “potentially divisive.”
The military service drafted a new policy that classifies them as “potentially divisive.”
U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas, nooses as hate symbols
The military service, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security, has drafted a new policy that classifies such items “potentially divisive.”
www.washingtonpost.com
November 20, 2025 at 7:11 PM
It certainly appears that the United States government is run by neo-Nazis.
Reposted by Phoukaco
Donald Trump doesn't want to release the Epstein files because he's in the files.
Trump is in the files because he was "best friends" with Epstein for years.
He was "best friends" with Epstein for years because they were abusing women and girls together.
His attacks won't change any of that.
Trump is in the files because he was "best friends" with Epstein for years.
He was "best friends" with Epstein for years because they were abusing women and girls together.
His attacks won't change any of that.
‘Democrats are going to come to regret this’: After Epstein vote, Trump ready to attack
The White House is frustrated about being backed into a corner on the Epstein vote. They plan to punish Democrats for it.
www.politico.com
November 19, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Donald Trump doesn't want to release the Epstein files because he's in the files.
Trump is in the files because he was "best friends" with Epstein for years.
He was "best friends" with Epstein for years because they were abusing women and girls together.
His attacks won't change any of that.
Trump is in the files because he was "best friends" with Epstein for years.
He was "best friends" with Epstein for years because they were abusing women and girls together.
His attacks won't change any of that.
Reposted by Phoukaco
I think the word you’re looking for is “kept”
Elon Musk’s foundation gave away a record $474 million in 2024, with the vast majority again going to entities he controls
Elon Musk Gave Away $474 Million in 2024, Mostly to Entities He Controls
Elon Musk’s foundation gave away a record $474 million in 2024, with the vast majority again going to entities he controls.
bloom.bg
November 19, 2025 at 2:14 AM
I think the word you’re looking for is “kept”
Reposted by Phoukaco
Is it a threat to free speech when the President of the United States threatens to yank the broadcast license of a channel whose reporters are asking him challenging questions?
I ask because I feel like there used to be tons of pundits worried about free speech. Where'd they go?
I ask because I feel like there used to be tons of pundits worried about free speech. Where'd they go?
Trump in response to an Epstein question: "ABC, your company, your crappy company is one of the perpetrators. I think the license should be taken away from ABC because your news is so fake and so wrong. And we have a great commissioner, a chairman, who should take a look at that."
November 18, 2025 at 6:19 PM
Is it a threat to free speech when the President of the United States threatens to yank the broadcast license of a channel whose reporters are asking him challenging questions?
I ask because I feel like there used to be tons of pundits worried about free speech. Where'd they go?
I ask because I feel like there used to be tons of pundits worried about free speech. Where'd they go?
Reposted by Phoukaco
I mean, look, I'm not a reporter, so who am I to talk?
But on a day where the president both just called a woman reporter "Piggy" and is celebrating someone who had people bone saw apart one of my colleagues, I might just be a little ready to defend my colleagues and profession.
But that's just me
But on a day where the president both just called a woman reporter "Piggy" and is celebrating someone who had people bone saw apart one of my colleagues, I might just be a little ready to defend my colleagues and profession.
But that's just me
November 18, 2025 at 5:26 PM
I mean, look, I'm not a reporter, so who am I to talk?
But on a day where the president both just called a woman reporter "Piggy" and is celebrating someone who had people bone saw apart one of my colleagues, I might just be a little ready to defend my colleagues and profession.
But that's just me
But on a day where the president both just called a woman reporter "Piggy" and is celebrating someone who had people bone saw apart one of my colleagues, I might just be a little ready to defend my colleagues and profession.
But that's just me
There is really something very, very wrong with this man. Mental illness, strokes, dementia...or just plain evil. This is not how normal people talk.
We really need a better way to remove a president who is clearly incompetent and insane.
We really need a better way to remove a president who is clearly incompetent and insane.
Trump suggests Khashoggi had it coming: "You're mentioning someone that was extremely controversial. A lot of people didn't like that gentleman that you're talking about. Whether you like him or didn't like him, things happen. But he knew nothing about it. You don't have to embarrass our guest."
November 18, 2025 at 5:49 PM
There is really something very, very wrong with this man. Mental illness, strokes, dementia...or just plain evil. This is not how normal people talk.
We really need a better way to remove a president who is clearly incompetent and insane.
We really need a better way to remove a president who is clearly incompetent and insane.