Paul Chamberlain
@paulywog2.bsky.social
Theatre artist, among other things, doing the best I can in NYC.
No one:
Not a single soul:
Male journalists to the world: “Oh hey, I also f*cked Olivia Nuzzi! In this essay, I will…”
Not a single soul:
Male journalists to the world: “Oh hey, I also f*cked Olivia Nuzzi! In this essay, I will…”
December 4, 2025 at 2:09 AM
No one:
Not a single soul:
Male journalists to the world: “Oh hey, I also f*cked Olivia Nuzzi! In this essay, I will…”
Not a single soul:
Male journalists to the world: “Oh hey, I also f*cked Olivia Nuzzi! In this essay, I will…”
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Not to diminish law review articles & law school committee work, but right now law professors should be working collectively on an intellectual & service project of immense, existential importance: building consensus around a revolutionary constitutional framework-of a Reconstruction 2.0 magnitude.
October 22, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Not to diminish law review articles & law school committee work, but right now law professors should be working collectively on an intellectual & service project of immense, existential importance: building consensus around a revolutionary constitutional framework-of a Reconstruction 2.0 magnitude.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers (or online).
"alleged drug vessel"
Call it a boat. A vessel. Anything that you can actually prove. There is exactly zero reason now, at the eighth instance, to use the administration's preferred language, without any evidence.
"alleged drug vessel"
Call it a boat. A vessel. Anything that you can actually prove. There is exactly zero reason now, at the eighth instance, to use the administration's preferred language, without any evidence.
October 22, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers (or online).
"alleged drug vessel"
Call it a boat. A vessel. Anything that you can actually prove. There is exactly zero reason now, at the eighth instance, to use the administration's preferred language, without any evidence.
"alleged drug vessel"
Call it a boat. A vessel. Anything that you can actually prove. There is exactly zero reason now, at the eighth instance, to use the administration's preferred language, without any evidence.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
👇 is why you Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers. in October 2025.
Trump Administration Live Updates: White House Changes Course and Will Demolish Entire East Wing
www.nytimes.com
October 22, 2025 at 8:13 PM
👇 is why you Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers. in October 2025.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Again, Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers (or online).
Even if true, this is wildly illegal & violates all the laws. That is the headline. We're so far past stenography in October 2025. Whatever world in which this worked as a way to cover 🇺🇸 politics is gone, over, & totally done with now.
Even if true, this is wildly illegal & violates all the laws. That is the headline. We're so far past stenography in October 2025. Whatever world in which this worked as a way to cover 🇺🇸 politics is gone, over, & totally done with now.
The White House said on Tuesday it will submit plans for President Donald Trump's $250 million White House ballroom project to a body that oversees federal building construction, even though demolition work began earlier this week reut.rs/4ndTcfL
October 22, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Again, Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers (or online).
Even if true, this is wildly illegal & violates all the laws. That is the headline. We're so far past stenography in October 2025. Whatever world in which this worked as a way to cover 🇺🇸 politics is gone, over, & totally done with now.
Even if true, this is wildly illegal & violates all the laws. That is the headline. We're so far past stenography in October 2025. Whatever world in which this worked as a way to cover 🇺🇸 politics is gone, over, & totally done with now.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Again, what KImmel said was NOT that Robinson might have been MAGA, but that the MAGA gang was desperately trying to say he was not and to score political points from it. Where is the deep offense to civility there, not to mention from a late night comedian?
September 17, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Again, what KImmel said was NOT that Robinson might have been MAGA, but that the MAGA gang was desperately trying to say he was not and to score political points from it. Where is the deep offense to civility there, not to mention from a late night comedian?
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
For instance, when people wonder why most Democratic leaders don’t have the spine to stand up to Trump, they forget where and with whom they spend most of their time—with funders and business people who for the most part are just fine with what's going on.
September 17, 2025 at 4:38 PM
For instance, when people wonder why most Democratic leaders don’t have the spine to stand up to Trump, they forget where and with whom they spend most of their time—with funders and business people who for the most part are just fine with what's going on.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
great news! you're not actually seeing karl rove, john yoo, and david frum criticize the administration's lawlessness more stridently than dem leadership. you, reader, were infected with rabies by a brown bat 36 hours ago and this is all just the virus working its way through your nervous system
September 18, 2025 at 2:11 AM
great news! you're not actually seeing karl rove, john yoo, and david frum criticize the administration's lawlessness more stridently than dem leadership. you, reader, were infected with rabies by a brown bat 36 hours ago and this is all just the virus working its way through your nervous system
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
“Patel’s handling of the Kirk investigation is a reminder that the skill set required to succeed as an influencer is not the same as what is required to effectively run the FBI. It’s not just amateur hour at the FBI, but influencer hour”
Kash Patel is leading the agency investigating Charlie Kirk's death. But he also cannot stop posting
The Influencer FBI
The skill set required to succeed online may not always translate to effective law enforcement.
www.theatlantic.com
September 12, 2025 at 8:13 PM
“Patel’s handling of the Kirk investigation is a reminder that the skill set required to succeed as an influencer is not the same as what is required to effectively run the FBI. It’s not just amateur hour at the FBI, but influencer hour”
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Just thinking about how the right made up an entirely fictional left wing character that resulted in so many bomb threats and the like and nobody will face consequences. But people on the left who accurately clocked the victim’s life work lost jobs.
September 13, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Just thinking about how the right made up an entirely fictional left wing character that resulted in so many bomb threats and the like and nobody will face consequences. But people on the left who accurately clocked the victim’s life work lost jobs.
Be fully prepared for the Supreme Court to get rid of district judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. They just have to chalk up another one in the win column for Daddy Trump before they go on their billionaire-funded vacations for the summer.
June 27, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Be fully prepared for the Supreme Court to get rid of district judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. They just have to chalk up another one in the win column for Daddy Trump before they go on their billionaire-funded vacations for the summer.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Must-read. @gregsargent.bsky.social is all over it.
If you strip away the egos and shitposting, the Trump-Musk feud is really an argument over how comprehensively to screw over poor and working people—over how best to make our society a meaner, crueler, less equal, more savage place.
New piece from me:
newrepublic.com/article/1962...
New piece from me:
newrepublic.com/article/1962...
The Real Reason for the Trump-Musk Feud is Uglier than You Think
Strip away the ego contest, and what you really see here is a competition about how screw over poor and working people more effectively.
newrepublic.com
June 6, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Must-read. @gregsargent.bsky.social is all over it.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
It's as if he's on drugs.
I'm sorry, as much as I am enjoying this spat, how can you take seriously someone who spent 100s of millions of dollars electing Trump, then went to work for Trump, left government just days ago praising Trump, and is now calling for Trump's impeachment.
Just unserious people.
Just unserious people.
June 5, 2025 at 8:28 PM
It's as if he's on drugs.
Brace yourselves for some more Supreme Court f*ckery this morning.
June 5, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Brace yourselves for some more Supreme Court f*ckery this morning.
By my count, SCOTUS has thirty-five (35) cases in which to issue a decision… in the next 28 days. And I don’t think that includes any of the emergency applications. Don’t they need to like, get to work on releasing some of those? Or am I buggin’?
June 3, 2025 at 5:18 PM
By my count, SCOTUS has thirty-five (35) cases in which to issue a decision… in the next 28 days. And I don’t think that includes any of the emergency applications. Don’t they need to like, get to work on releasing some of those? Or am I buggin’?
The felon-in-chief suspended habeas corpus the day the first planes took off and headed for El Salvador. It’s been months and they’ve faced zero actual repercussions.
Blanket presidential immunity made this possible.
Blanket presidential immunity made this possible.
May 28, 2025 at 5:23 AM
The felon-in-chief suspended habeas corpus the day the first planes took off and headed for El Salvador. It’s been months and they’ve faced zero actual repercussions.
Blanket presidential immunity made this possible.
Blanket presidential immunity made this possible.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Can't help but feel we're living through an increasingly existential war between spectacle and substance with spectacle winning battle after battle after battle.
May 27, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Can't help but feel we're living through an increasingly existential war between spectacle and substance with spectacle winning battle after battle after battle.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
Pentagon announces that it has formally accepted the "palace in the sky" jet from Qatar. Plain and simple violation of the Emoluments Clause without congressional approval. Don't think this is over.
May 21, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Pentagon announces that it has formally accepted the "palace in the sky" jet from Qatar. Plain and simple violation of the Emoluments Clause without congressional approval. Don't think this is over.
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
This is a no-brainer for Democrats who want to show they have some fight in them. For pardoning violent criminals who killed police officers, he should be impeached. Of course, it won't pass, but Dems need to start making the case. Today.
Impeach Donald Trump open.substack.com/pub/brianbeu...
Impeach Donald Trump open.substack.com/pub/brianbeu...
Impeach Donald Trump
Do the obviously correct thing.
open.substack.com
January 21, 2025 at 2:25 PM
This is a no-brainer for Democrats who want to show they have some fight in them. For pardoning violent criminals who killed police officers, he should be impeached. Of course, it won't pass, but Dems need to start making the case. Today.
Impeach Donald Trump open.substack.com/pub/brianbeu...
Impeach Donald Trump open.substack.com/pub/brianbeu...
Reposted by Paul Chamberlain
A graphic depiction helps make clear that Trump has no “mandate.” One of the narrowest popular vote wins in history.
November 28, 2024 at 3:43 PM
A graphic depiction helps make clear that Trump has no “mandate.” One of the narrowest popular vote wins in history.
Ok, but how do I find people that I know on here? No import contacts or anything like that? Maybe I’m missing something obvious someone can point me towards?
November 21, 2024 at 4:38 AM
Ok, but how do I find people that I know on here? No import contacts or anything like that? Maybe I’m missing something obvious someone can point me towards?
🎵
Blue skies
Smiling at me
Nothing but blue skies
Do I see
🎶
Blue skies
Smiling at me
Nothing but blue skies
Do I see
🎶
November 14, 2024 at 6:17 PM
🎵
Blue skies
Smiling at me
Nothing but blue skies
Do I see
🎶
Blue skies
Smiling at me
Nothing but blue skies
Do I see
🎶