Caring whether it's fit for purpose and methodically examining what's being proposed to assess it is for pussies.
Caring whether it's fit for purpose and methodically examining what's being proposed to assess it is for pussies.
More info, such as it is, here: https://www.cu.edu/gen-ai
Check the "Guiding Principles" section for entertainment.
But LLMs are worse: they are software designed to sound right and authoritative, but can make mistakes in all kinds of ways, including mistakes that no human would make.
But LLMs are worse: they are software designed to sound right and authoritative, but can make mistakes in all kinds of ways, including mistakes that no human would make.
by puny human legs (worst of both a human and horse!). Humans are supposed to be keeping vigilant for mistakes and errors, but they are not particularly good at this.
by puny human legs (worst of both a human and horse!). Humans are supposed to be keeping vigilant for mistakes and errors, but they are not particularly good at this.
"The Philosophical Prospects of Large Language
Models in the Future of Mathematics"
Online now in the Annals of Mathematics and Philosophy: mxphi.com/wp-content/u...
Please share it with anyone interested in LLMs and Mathematics!
🧵
"The Philosophical Prospects of Large Language
Models in the Future of Mathematics"
Online now in the Annals of Mathematics and Philosophy: mxphi.com/wp-content/u...
Please share it with anyone interested in LLMs and Mathematics!
🧵
I have a novelty indicator for them. It is digital, and highly expressive.
I have a novelty indicator for them. It is digital, and highly expressive.
Don’t work for free, and especially don’t work for free for anything that seems to be scraping your free work for slopAI metric nonsense
I have a novelty indicator for them. It is digital, and highly expressive.
Don’t work for free, and especially don’t work for free for anything that seems to be scraping your free work for slopAI metric nonsense
www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v4...
Would be nice to hear this reflected in how we discuss financial modelling in UK HE. Currently, we seems to stuck at "number go up, number go down" rather than what kind of institution are we and why?
Would be nice to hear this reflected in how we discuss financial modelling in UK HE. Currently, we seems to stuck at "number go up, number go down" rather than what kind of institution are we and why?
...and I can't stop thinking about how ridiculously, hilariously phallic they all look.
...and I can't stop thinking about how ridiculously, hilariously phallic they all look.
*Talk of belt-tightening
*Incidental savings (e.g. printing, refreshments)
*Travel budgets cut
*Promotion freeze (1/4)
Sizeable surplus @ Edinburgh Uni
Financial pressure is from irresponsible capital spending & depreciation
Management metrics mislead
Redundancies hit financial strength & Uni’s academic mission
www.ucuedinburgh.org.uk/blog/depreci...
Sizeable surplus @ Edinburgh Uni
Financial pressure is from irresponsible capital spending & depreciation
Management metrics mislead
Redundancies hit financial strength & Uni’s academic mission
www.ucuedinburgh.org.uk/blog/depreci...