BIO: https://law.utexas.edu/faculty/lee-kovarsky/
MILLER: Greenland should be part of the US. By what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? The US is the power of NATO
T: So force is on the table?
M: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over future of Greenland
- every parent everywhere
- every parent everywhere
And at least some of the conspiracy has to be carried out in US to charge that.
And at least some of the conspiracy has to be carried out in US to charge that.
Submit your article here: https://www.floridalawreview.com/for-authors #LRSubmissions
Let's do the fucking news!'
“No amount of outrage—whether from activist organizations or the White House—will derail us. We are not out to score points with one side of the political spectrum or to win followers on social media.”
Let's do the fucking news!'
Amazing to watch her try to act like a radical in a room full of people who know she's Charlatan, Inc.
One CBS staffer tells me: "She really has no idea how insulting she comes across."
Amazing to watch her try to act like a radical in a room full of people who know she's Charlatan, Inc.
it doesn't actually have to be blue books.
Listen, students have been outsourcing everything to AI and cheating their way through college. Blue books should be celebrated as a return to authentic human learning.
it doesn't actually have to be blue books.
Whren is maybe THE WORST case for the proposition that law enforcement can't discriminatorily enforce. In Whren, SCOTUS held that the 4th amendment didn't bar pretextual stops actually based on race.
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
1/
Whren is maybe THE WORST case for the proposition that law enforcement can't discriminatorily enforce. In Whren, SCOTUS held that the 4th amendment didn't bar pretextual stops actually based on race.
supreme.justia.com/cases/federa...
1/
octopuses are like jfk i can't believe we're beneath these idiots on the food chain.
octopuses are like jfk i can't believe we're beneath these idiots on the food chain.
BURGUM: The national security concerns as delivered by a classified Dept of War report focus around radar and radar interference
I wouldn't hold myself out as an expert on the underlying substantive law questions, but Boasberg gets the class action stuff right:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I wouldn't hold myself out as an expert on the underlying substantive law questions, but Boasberg gets the class action stuff right:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
One logical answer is the writer agrees with those stances.
at this point the only reasonable conclusion is they refuse to update their priors w/ new data because the data is inconvenient for them
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/the-cost-o...