www.joanwestenberg.com/the-rime-of...
www.joanwestenberg.com/the-rime-of...
check the link in their profile
they haven't even figured out how to use opus to update the "product" they're "working on" to not be crypto bullshit
check the link in their profile
they haven't even figured out how to use opus to update the "product" they're "working on" to not be crypto bullshit
To get something useful out of an agent you need to set very strict rules, write an in-depth specification and have some kind of test loop, so that the agent can iterate on the solution. If you leave any room for interpretation, the output is just garbage.
To get something useful out of an agent you need to set very strict rules, write an in-depth specification and have some kind of test loop, so that the agent can iterate on the solution. If you leave any room for interpretation, the output is just garbage.
johncodes.com/archive/2025...
johncodes.com/archive/2025...
resources.github.com/actions/2026...
resources.github.com/actions/2026...
Typing on his mechanical keyboard,
Writing Rust without any A.I,
And building a serial motor driver like a mad man.
That man is me
😂
Typing on his mechanical keyboard,
Writing Rust without any A.I,
And building a serial motor driver like a mad man.
That man is me
😂
Us: Across your entire career?
Reiner: In a 6 year period.
Us: That sounds-
Reiner: -Each one will be arguably the best movie in that genre.
Us: Across your entire career?
Reiner: In a 6 year period.
Us: That sounds-
Reiner: -Each one will be arguably the best movie in that genre.
Code review has never been more important than in the age of AI-generated code.
To maintain a codebase I really need to know:
- What this code does?
For the code to satisfy this criteria it needs to be carefully reviewed (by a human) before the merge.
Current code review tools just don’t make much sense for AI-generated code
When reviewing code I really want to know:
- The prompt made by the dev
- What corrections the other dev made to the code
- Clear marking of code AI-generated not changed by a human
Code review has never been more important than in the age of AI-generated code.
To maintain a codebase I really need to know:
- What this code does?
For the code to satisfy this criteria it needs to be carefully reviewed (by a human) before the merge.
Love it!
bcantrill.dtrace.org/2025/12/05/y...
Love it!
Then once you’ve formed a better world model you can build a more accurate representation within tighter constraints.
1. kludge a working prototype together, don’t worry about the code AT ALL. the point is understanding how the requirements function in reality
2. destroy the prototype completely. build the app for real using my better mental model
Then once you’ve formed a better world model you can build a more accurate representation within tighter constraints.