Very likely why he discredited Byline Times.
Very likely why he discredited Byline Times.
"Your position is utterly incoherent"
"You have provided no evidence that it's the Equalities Act that discriminates against white working class boys"
"Your position is utterly incoherent"
"You have provided no evidence that it's the Equalities Act that discriminates against white working class boys"
"Replace the 2010 Equalities Act"
"The Equalities Act requires discrimination in the name of ‘positive action’. We will scrap Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DE&I) rules that have lowered standards and reduced economic
productivity"
"Replace the 2010 Equalities Act"
"The Equalities Act requires discrimination in the name of ‘positive action’. We will scrap Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DE&I) rules that have lowered standards and reduced economic
productivity"
"There are no protected groups in the Act, only protected characteristics. A white man is just as protected on characteristics of race and sex as a black woman. Yet many believe the Act is just there to protect minorities"
[Kemi Badenoch, 2023]
"There are no protected groups in the Act, only protected characteristics. A white man is just as protected on characteristics of race and sex as a black woman. Yet many believe the Act is just there to protect minorities"
[Kemi Badenoch, 2023]
"Whatever intention was of passing the EA" says Zia Yusuf, "it stops discrimination against some people in its current form, but actually industralises discrimination against others"
A common misconception
"Whatever intention was of passing the EA" says Zia Yusuf, "it stops discrimination against some people in its current form, but actually industralises discrimination against others"
A common misconception
Why did he seek to mock and ridicule the journalist asking a perfectly legitimate question and try to deligitimise the FT?
Easy. That's who he is. An arrogant man who doesn't have any policies beyond pointing at the sea.
Why did he seek to mock and ridicule the journalist asking a perfectly legitimate question and try to deligitimise the FT?
Easy. That's who he is. An arrogant man who doesn't have any policies beyond pointing at the sea.
I got my MMR about 10 years ago!
www.nhs.uk/vaccinations...
I got my MMR about 10 years ago!
www.nhs.uk/vaccinations...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
goodlawproject.org/orbans-pay-c...
Trade Minister: Richard Tice
Once said: "Brexit will not damage UK-EU trade"
Chancellor: Robert Jenrick
*Admitted to breaking tax laws*
Equality Sec: Suella Braverman
*Hates Equality*
Home Sec: Zia Yusuf
Prick
Trade Minister: Richard Tice
Once said: "Brexit will not damage UK-EU trade"
Chancellor: Robert Jenrick
*Admitted to breaking tax laws*
Equality Sec: Suella Braverman
*Hates Equality*
Home Sec: Zia Yusuf
Prick
Yusuf, Hampton School, £29,916 per year
Jenrick, Wolverhampton Grammar, £17,835 per year
Farage, Dulwich College, £30,618 per year
Tice, Uppingham School, £58,176 per year
Braverman, Heathfield School, defunct private school
The authentic voice of the working class
Yusuf, Hampton School, £29,916 per year
Jenrick, Wolverhampton Grammar, £17,835 per year
Farage, Dulwich College, £30,618 per year
Tice, Uppingham School, £58,176 per year
Braverman, Heathfield School, defunct private school
The authentic voice of the working class
Nigel Farage claims the FT ignored the Mandelson-Epstein scandal
it was on the front page for SIX days
(long before he appears to have even noticed it)
Nigel Farage claims the FT ignored the Mandelson-Epstein scandal
it was on the front page for SIX days
(long before he appears to have even noticed it)
(who was politely asking a reasonable question)
Is this how Reform UK would ignore media questions if they got into government?
(who was politely asking a reasonable question)
Presumably because if he becomes Prime Minister, there’ll be no NHS.
Presumably because if he becomes Prime Minister, there’ll be no NHS.