Jens Peter Andersen
@ipoga.bsky.social
Senior researcher: bibliometrics, policy impact, scientific elites & quant studies of gender in research at Aarhus University. #bibliometrics #scientometrics #scisci #metascience
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
🧵 1/
🚨 New paper out in PLOS ONE! w/ @caropradier.bsky.social @benzpierre.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social @ipoga.bsky.social @lariviev.bsky.social
We studied 43k authors and 264k citation links in U.S. economics to ask:
👉 Why do some papers cite others?
🔗 journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
🚨 New paper out in PLOS ONE! w/ @caropradier.bsky.social @benzpierre.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social @ipoga.bsky.social @lariviev.bsky.social
We studied 43k authors and 264k citation links in U.S. economics to ask:
👉 Why do some papers cite others?
🔗 journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
October 27, 2025 at 6:06 PM
🧵 1/
🚨 New paper out in PLOS ONE! w/ @caropradier.bsky.social @benzpierre.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social @ipoga.bsky.social @lariviev.bsky.social
We studied 43k authors and 264k citation links in U.S. economics to ask:
👉 Why do some papers cite others?
🔗 journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
🚨 New paper out in PLOS ONE! w/ @caropradier.bsky.social @benzpierre.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social @ipoga.bsky.social @lariviev.bsky.social
We studied 43k authors and 264k citation links in U.S. economics to ask:
👉 Why do some papers cite others?
🔗 journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
📢 New reviewed preprint, published by @elife.bsky.social at doi.org/10.7554/eLif.... We study two effects in science funding across 14 different funding programmes from 6 research funders across Europe and North America: (1) The Matthew effect; and (2) and the early-career setback effect.
🧵1/8
🧵1/8
October 15, 2025 at 8:56 AM
📢 New reviewed preprint, published by @elife.bsky.social at doi.org/10.7554/eLif.... We study two effects in science funding across 14 different funding programmes from 6 research funders across Europe and North America: (1) The Matthew effect; and (2) and the early-career setback effect.
🧵1/8
🧵1/8
Is anyone else getting a peculiar email about retracting articles from "Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences"?
February 19, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Is anyone else getting a peculiar email about retracting articles from "Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences"?
My colleagues and I have been sharing blogs and news about a survey we did on how researchers use generative AI - that study is now published and openly available here:
doi.org/10.1016/j.te...
doi.org/10.1016/j.te...
January 23, 2025 at 9:59 AM
My colleagues and I have been sharing blogs and news about a survey we did on how researchers use generative AI - that study is now published and openly available here:
doi.org/10.1016/j.te...
doi.org/10.1016/j.te...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
Added context, since polls can only be very short:
It seems like a somewhat standard practice now, that editors create reviewer accounts without consent or contact, as a service, so the potential reviewer doesn't have to do it themself. It used to be the opposite. #peerreview #reviewer2
It seems like a somewhat standard practice now, that editors create reviewer accounts without consent or contact, as a service, so the potential reviewer doesn't have to do it themself. It used to be the opposite. #peerreview #reviewer2
Journal editors create reviewer accounts automatically, with username and password, without prior consent. What are your thoughts on this?
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
December 11, 2024 at 10:11 AM
Added context, since polls can only be very short:
It seems like a somewhat standard practice now, that editors create reviewer accounts without consent or contact, as a service, so the potential reviewer doesn't have to do it themself. It used to be the opposite. #peerreview #reviewer2
It seems like a somewhat standard practice now, that editors create reviewer accounts without consent or contact, as a service, so the potential reviewer doesn't have to do it themself. It used to be the opposite. #peerreview #reviewer2
Journal editors create reviewer accounts automatically, with username and password, without prior consent. What are your thoughts on this?
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
December 11, 2024 at 10:08 AM
Journal editors create reviewer accounts automatically, with username and password, without prior consent. What are your thoughts on this?
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It's a great service, it saves me some hassle.
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">I don't really care.
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/qTlBWu/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">It feels icky and predatory.
📊 Show results
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
Young researchers have embraced AI as an accelerator of their work. If that is to help science rather than damage it, they need careful guidance, say Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga.bsky.social and Serge Horbach. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-euro...
If AI is an accelerator, will research need speed limits? - Research Professional News
Junior researchers’ enthusiasm for technology needs careful guidance, say Jens Peter Andersen and Serge Horbach
www.researchprofessionalnews.com
December 6, 2024 at 10:19 AM
Young researchers have embraced AI as an accelerator of their work. If that is to help science rather than damage it, they need careful guidance, say Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga.bsky.social and Serge Horbach. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-euro...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
New paper out with @benzpierre.bsky.social @kristofferkropp.bsky.social and Trine Cosmus Nobel in a special issue on Mapping relational structures in culture
Two new publications that encapsulate my interests to present my self. Both are focusing on science in Europe and the processes shaping science and especially social science in Europe. In the first one we analyze scientific disciplines using ERC projects and topic analysis.
doi.org/10.1016/j.po...
doi.org/10.1016/j.po...
Homologies in fields of cultural production. Evidence from the European scientific field
This article suggests a comparative field analytical approach to fields of cultural production. Combining concepts from field analysis and focusing on…
www.sciencedirect.com
December 4, 2024 at 7:31 AM
New paper out with @benzpierre.bsky.social @kristofferkropp.bsky.social and Trine Cosmus Nobel in a special issue on Mapping relational structures in culture
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
it's amazing to have my first post in this social media to share this great paper we just published, lead by @caropradier.bsky.social on topics, local circuits and gender inequality in Latin America.
Our new article ‘Science for whom? The influence of the regional academic circuit on gender inequalities in Latin America’ has just been published! asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
A work we did with @diegokoz.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social and @lariviev.bsky.social
A work we did with @diegokoz.bsky.social @natsush.bsky.social and @lariviev.bsky.social
<em>Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology</em> | Wiley Online Library
The Latin-American scientific community has achieved significant progress towards gender parity, with nearly equal representation of women and men scientists. Nevertheless, women continue to be under...
asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
December 4, 2024 at 2:41 PM
it's amazing to have my first post in this social media to share this great paper we just published, lead by @caropradier.bsky.social on topics, local circuits and gender inequality in Latin America.
What is disruption in science?
I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University.
If you are interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.
I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University.
If you are interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.
a woman says you are being disruptive
ALT: a woman says you are being disruptive
media.tenor.com
December 2, 2024 at 9:11 AM
What is disruption in science?
I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University.
If you are interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.
I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University.
If you are interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
Updated -largely no exhaustive- list : go.bsky.app/R8RNJgc
Please reply to be added.
Please reply to be added.
November 22, 2024 at 7:25 AM
Updated -largely no exhaustive- list : go.bsky.app/R8RNJgc
Please reply to be added.
Please reply to be added.
With all the new influx of users, I’d love to see a community around #sciencepolicy #scipol #bibliometrics #scientometrics #scisci #metascience. Please share if you want to be part of it, use the tags to find others, or just say hi 👋
November 21, 2024 at 9:13 PM
With all the new influx of users, I’d love to see a community around #sciencepolicy #scipol #bibliometrics #scientometrics #scisci #metascience. Please share if you want to be part of it, use the tags to find others, or just say hi 👋
Interested in writing a PhD in the broad area of “research on research” (responsible research, research integrity, bibliometrics, scientometrics, science funding, research policy, etc.)? We (@cfa_res_pol) have fully funded positions every 6 months: bss.au.dk/en/research/...
Application
bss.au.dk
January 14, 2024 at 12:17 PM
Interested in writing a PhD in the broad area of “research on research” (responsible research, research integrity, bibliometrics, scientometrics, science funding, research policy, etc.)? We (@cfa_res_pol) have fully funded positions every 6 months: bss.au.dk/en/research/...
The Christian implications of God creating mankind and our Earth, without a mention of other worlds or life in the vastness of the Universe is historically meaningful, but to me, philosophically sorrowful. And as Carl Sagan (in Pale Blue Dot) goes on to argue, grounds for much chauvinism.
December 28, 2023 at 9:35 AM
The Christian implications of God creating mankind and our Earth, without a mention of other worlds or life in the vastness of the Universe is historically meaningful, but to me, philosophically sorrowful. And as Carl Sagan (in Pale Blue Dot) goes on to argue, grounds for much chauvinism.
😂
Alice laughed. 'Cohen's D=4.08? There's no use trying—one can't believe impossible things.'
I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for 30min a day. Sometimes I reviewed as many as six papers with impossible effect sizes before breakfast."
I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for 30min a day. Sometimes I reviewed as many as six papers with impossible effect sizes before breakfast."
December 7, 2023 at 4:09 PM
😂
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
A little teaser of my forthcoming paper - co-authored with a former Aarhus University student, Freja 🤞🤓 Hope it will be published early next year. www.ru.nl/en/research/...
This Danish LinkedIn trend (unintentionally) maintains traditional gender bias | Radboud University
Utofts' Research on motherhood on social media encourages reflection on the broader implications of societal expectations on new mothers. It emphasises the collective effort needed to challenge tradit...
www.ru.nl
November 30, 2023 at 11:22 AM
A little teaser of my forthcoming paper - co-authored with a former Aarhus University student, Freja 🤞🤓 Hope it will be published early next year. www.ru.nl/en/research/...
Highly interesting study from the ScholCommLab on how much funding is spent on APCs at the Big 5 journal publishers. It’s a lot, it mostly goes to Springer-Nature and especially Scientific Reports and Nature Communications: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
The Oligopoly’s Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Pro...
Abstract. This study aims to estimate the total amount of article processing charges (APCs) paid to publish open access (OA) in journals controlled by the five large commercial publishers Elsevier, Sa...
direct.mit.edu
November 10, 2023 at 3:47 PM
Highly interesting study from the ScholCommLab on how much funding is spent on APCs at the Big 5 journal publishers. It’s a lot, it mostly goes to Springer-Nature and especially Scientific Reports and Nature Communications: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
Tomorrow at the Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, we are delighted to host Ophelia Deroy and Bahador Bahrami.
Two talks, starting at 11 am. You can even join online.
See the link below for talk abstracts & online participation:
interactingminds.au.dk/events/singl...
Two talks, starting at 11 am. You can even join online.
See the link below for talk abstracts & online participation:
interactingminds.au.dk/events/singl...
Co-Perception: Sharing experience without coordination // Shared responsibility in collective decisi...
IMC Tuesday Seminar: Talks by Ophelia Deroy and Bahador Bahrami
interactingminds.au.dk
November 6, 2023 at 7:37 AM
Tomorrow at the Interacting Minds Center, Aarhus University, we are delighted to host Ophelia Deroy and Bahador Bahrami.
Two talks, starting at 11 am. You can even join online.
See the link below for talk abstracts & online participation:
interactingminds.au.dk/events/singl...
Two talks, starting at 11 am. You can even join online.
See the link below for talk abstracts & online participation:
interactingminds.au.dk/events/singl...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
I currently have two PhD opportunities available. One is on early EF dev in children born preterm, the other is on the association between attention and early EF dev. Please share or get in touch if interested :-)
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
October 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM
I currently have two PhD opportunities available. One is on early EF dev in children born preterm, the other is on the association between attention and early EF dev. Please share or get in touch if interested :-)
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
www.findaphd.com/phds/project...
Just published this preprint with Tony Ross-Hellauer and Serge Horbach on the special "contributed" article type in PNAS and it's utilisation by NAS members. Open for comments, if anyone has thoughts: osf.io/preprints/so...
osf.io
October 18, 2023 at 2:05 PM
Just published this preprint with Tony Ross-Hellauer and Serge Horbach on the special "contributed" article type in PNAS and it's utilisation by NAS members. Open for comments, if anyone has thoughts: osf.io/preprints/so...
October 12, 2023 at 8:08 PM
Looking for an invite code, if anyone has a spare? Apparently I used up the ones I had...
October 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM
Looking for an invite code, if anyone has a spare? Apparently I used up the ones I had...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
Two postdoc positions on AI & Politics at the University of Amsterdam:
www.academictransfer.com/nl/332516/tw...
www.academictransfer.com/nl/332516/tw...
October 6, 2023 at 7:09 AM
Two postdoc positions on AI & Politics at the University of Amsterdam:
www.academictransfer.com/nl/332516/tw...
www.academictransfer.com/nl/332516/tw...
Reposted by Jens Peter Andersen
New preprint finds MANY influential papers are in journals with Impact Factor <15.
~10✖ more researchers have highly influential papers than publish journals with Impact Factor >15.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
~10✖ more researchers have highly influential papers than publish journals with Impact Factor >15.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
October 5, 2023 at 7:45 PM
New preprint finds MANY influential papers are in journals with Impact Factor <15.
~10✖ more researchers have highly influential papers than publish journals with Impact Factor >15.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
~10✖ more researchers have highly influential papers than publish journals with Impact Factor >15.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...