- There are a lot of myths and anecdotal knowledge out there - we need to talk more about what we want to use GenAI for; including why, how, and when.

- What this is, varies by field, and especially how you produce new knowledge. What is fine in one field may not be in another - guidelines and policies need to reflect or accomodate this.

- Researchers have a pretty good idea about what they consider good and bad research practice, and tools like GenAI are used in accordance with recommendations about good, ethical practice.

We identified three main perceptions of the role of GenAI in research, and a number of recommendations for writing policies about GenAI for academic research. Some of the most important takeaways here are:

Full transparency: the open call is open to all applicants, and there are no guarantees for a job offer. I am offering to co-develop an application that addresses disruption in science, with plenty of room for personalising it.
Granted applications are fully funded three-year projects.

Hi Florian, great list, I’d love to be added

Current deadline is February 1st, so perhaps only relevant for those that already have a project description and want to expand where they apply :) for the fall deadline, feel free to get in touch for further information

The dot in question: