on X
https://x.com/hiallen72?s=21&t=WrQo8yo4jXdkrU8t8qeRRw
Also incredible that two persona in AI and brain on the two sides of the Earth echoed each other about biological learning rule. #NeuroAI
References should only be used for short-listed candidates for important positions/awards, and ideally, be done via a call to get the most honest opinion possible.
What's the point of having reference letters anymore if everyone is just having them written by machine?
References should only be used for short-listed candidates for important positions/awards, and ideally, be done via a call to get the most honest opinion possible.
If many people use AI to do task X, then that tells you that task X is actually just a brainless administrative exercise.
Any such task should probably be eliminated, and if that's not an option, modified to make automation even easier.
References should only be used for short-listed candidates for important positions/awards, and ideally, be done via a call to get the most honest opinion possible.
What's the point of having reference letters anymore if everyone is just having them written by machine?
If many people use AI to do task X, then that tells you that task X is actually just a brainless administrative exercise.
Any such task should probably be eliminated, and if that's not an option, modified to make automation even easier.
If DA RPE is the emperor, this work SCREAMS it was running naked all the time.
This paper got quite some attention recently. Let's simplify it a bit.
A🧵with my toy model and notes:
#neuroskyence #compneuro #NeuroAI
If DA RPE is the emperor, this work SCREAMS it was running naked all the time.
This paper got quite some attention recently. Let's simplify it a bit.
A🧵with my toy model and notes:
#neuroskyence #compneuro #NeuroAI
jobs.sciencecareers.org/job/675710/t...
jobs.sciencecareers.org/job/675710/t...
..."it is not surprising that a female scientist would think that she could ill afford th[e] luxury" of being seen to make mistakes because she was already subject to unfair scrutiny and criticism.
..."it is not surprising that a female scientist would think that she could ill afford th[e] luxury" of being seen to make mistakes because she was already subject to unfair scrutiny and criticism.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
openreview.net/forum?id=96l...
openreview.net/forum?id=96l...
arxiv.org/html/2510.01...
arxiv.org/html/2510.01...
arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212
arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212
@openmindjournal.bsky.social
The journal is diamond open access (free to read, free to publish) thanks to the support of MIT Press, Harvard Library, & MIT Library.
@openmindjournal.bsky.social
The journal is diamond open access (free to read, free to publish) thanks to the support of MIT Press, Harvard Library, & MIT Library.