Fred Bordignon
freddie2310.bsky.social
Fred Bordignon
@freddie2310.bsky.social
Researcher at LISIS & NanoBubbles team member
Research Integrity Officer & Bibliometrician at École nationale des ponts et chaussées

Blog: carnetist.hypotheses.org
Publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/frederique-bordignon
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
📢 Les inscriptions sont ouvertes pour #ImpactSO2026 !
📅 27–29 janvier 2026 à Nancy
3 jours pour explorer l’impact de la science ouverte sur la recherche :
🔹 Nouvelles pratiques scientifiques
🔹 Rôles des personnels d’appui
🔹 Reproductibilité et diffusion des résultats
🔗 impactso2026.sciencesconf.org
November 12, 2025 at 9:06 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Interesting new Google Scholar PDF button feature scholar.googleblog.com/2025/11/mark...
November 12, 2025 at 6:06 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
"It's tiiime!!!", comme le dit si bien Mariah Carey. C'est aujourd'hui que parait la liste 2025 des chercheurs très cités de Clarivate !

Êtes-vous prêts ? Avez-vous révisé l'histoire de cette liste ?

Si vous avez besoin d'une antisèche, c'est ici que cela se passe : direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Highly Cited Researchers: Anatomy of a list
Abstract. The list of Highly Cited Researchers (HCR) published each year by Clarivate occupies a special place in the academic landscape, due to its use in the Shanghai rankings. This article looks at...
direct.mit.edu
November 12, 2025 at 7:39 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Great news! 🎉 Our Open Research devroom has been accepted for another year at @fosdem.org CfP is now OPEN. Go to our website to see how you can submit a talk on anything research: research-fosdem.github.io
🗓️ Sunday 1st February
📍 Brussels, Belgium

Looking forward to seeing you all at #FOSDEM2026 👩🏽‍💻
a cartoon character says good news in front of a futurama sign
ALT: a cartoon character says good news in front of a futurama sign
media.tenor.com
November 10, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
"Reclaiming scientific discourse, one conversation at a time."

The Open Science Network aims to rebuild “Science Twitter” — but this time as a federated, community-governed platform built and owned by researchers and scientists.

👉 openscience.network

#OpenScience #ScholComm #Infrastructure
Open Science Network
Reclaim scientific discourse with federated digital spaces where researchers shape their own conversations, data, and collaborations
openscience.network
November 10, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Earthquake Prediction Flowchart

xkcd.com/3165/
November 10, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Our new bibliometric study reveals how a tiny typographic error, confusing the German Eszett (ß) with the Greek beta (β), has created hundreds of false positives like ß-catenin and ß-glucuronidase in major databases: doi.org/10.1108/JD-0... #bioscience #indexing #metadata #librarianship #linguistic
November 10, 2025 at 12:03 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
👀ICYMI: "the design of an approach to assess the societal impact of research requires more than an expert understanding of bibliometrics"

#ResearchManagement #ResearchImpact #Bibliometrics @lizziegadd.bsky.social @tanjastrom.bsky.social
How responsible is Clarivate’s “responsible” impact assessment framework? - Impact of Social Sciences
How responsible is Clarivate’s Responsible Framework for Evaluating the Societal Impact of Research according to the INORMS SCOPE framework?
blogs.lse.ac.uk
November 10, 2025 at 4:02 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
J'aurai le grand plaisir de présenter les travaux du projet #Harbinger en discussions (France et Chine) avec ma collègue et co-autrice, Jie XU (Université de Wuhan, Chine) à une session de séminaire du Robert K. Merton Zentrum für Wissenschaftsforschung (RMZ). Au plaisir d'échanger avec vous !
Join us on Wednesday for a talk by @c-bz.bsky.social & Jie Xu:

"The big transformation? Early Career Researchers as they race in the open scholarly world. Perspectives from France and China"

Nov. 12 | 11 AM CET | on Zoom or at Schönhauser Allee 10-11 in Berlin

More in the link below 👇
RMZ Jour fixe/ The big transformation? Early Career Researchers as they race in the open scholarly world. Perspectives from France and China
Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri (Département Informatique, Université Lyon, France) & Jie Xu (School of Information Management, Wuhan University, China)
www.rmz.hu-berlin.de
November 10, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
"Acquiring the Karger journals will provide OUP with many more downstream transfer destinations, helping OUP to publish more of the articles that get rejected by their higher impact journals."

Depressing assessment of the commercial strategy guiding academic publishing.
OUP acquires Karger's long tail
Hello fellow journalologists,
newsletter.journalology.com
November 10, 2025 at 7:48 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
[C'est foufou ça] les données historiques ("historicisées" ?) du DOAJ de 2006 à 2025 dans Zenodo 😍. Des snapshots annuels des listes de revues indexées.
#ROR #ResearchOnResearch #openscience #openaccess #data
Using DOAJ for your research?

Historical DOAJ data is now available on Zenodo (an open access research repository).

DOAJ data on Zenodo https://bit.ly/49cbDyi
##OpenData #OpenAccess
November 10, 2025 at 10:39 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Merci 🥰 dans le groupe #CSS impulsé par @eollion.bsky.social réflexion active & critique sur la place raisonnée à donner (ou pas) à ces traitements au sein de nos pratiques en sciences sociales - toutes les bonnes volontés sont bienvenus pour échanger !
Big up à @emilienschultz.bsky.social et son équipe qui travaillent sur cet outil d'ailleurs, ils sont plus enthousiastes que moi vis-à-vis des LLM en sciences sociales mais de ce que je réussis à capter ils travaillent sérieusement.
November 9, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Fun fact le "debunk" est sorti et sans surprise il se met le doigt dans l'oeil en disant que comme les chercheurs ont annoté les données avant de les faire analyser par un algorithme (BERT, en l'occurrence), ça a "biaisé" leurs données.

L'occasion d'expliquer comment ces travaux marchent.
La clique de l'observatoire des clowns est fâchée parce que quelqu'un a fait avec sérieux ce qu'ils prétendaient avoir fait en 2021.

Nocap cette étude témoigne d'un des usages utiles d'un LLM qu'on peut identifier (et en plus l'outil peut tourner, certes avec lenteur, sur un chipset :3).
November 9, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
A new study led by Carlos Chaccour and Matthew Rudd analyses more than 730,000 letters to scientific journals, and raises concerns about the growing use of #AI tools in academic publishing.

Read in @science.org: 🟠 https://f.mtr.cool/ukszxtdgri

#ScienceIntegrity #ResearchEthics #AIinScience
Letters to scientific journals surge as ‘prolific debutante’ authors likely use AI
New study reinforces worries about “mass production of junk” by unscrupulous scholars aiming to pad their CVs
f.mtr.cool
November 5, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
One of the first papermills was 'MedChina' - a Dr Jia-Li Liu - following a template to churn out fake meta-analysis papers.
forbetterscience.com/2022/06/07/t...

12 years too late, the editors of Gene finally got around to checking the .doc metadata of the manuscript.
pubpeer.com/publications...
November 6, 2025 at 4:16 AM
Happy to see my article being covered by @chemistryworld.com with interesting feedback from other colleagues www.chemistryworld.com/news/when-it... #thanks
When it comes to correcting the scientific record, chemists prefer to have a quiet word
Those surveyed even report introducing 'errors' into their work to satisfy reviewers
www.chemistryworld.com
November 6, 2025 at 7:10 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Saisir l’objet mouvant de la prédation dans la communication scientifique
Saisir l’objet mouvant de la prédation dans la communication scientifique
« (…) Une manière d’appréhender la prédation est de s’intéresser à la typologie des revues et éditeurs touchés. Car la prédation n’est pas un « type » unique de revue, mais un gradient de pra…
lalist.inist.fr
November 4, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
📢 Conférence « Science ouverte & évaluation de la recherche »
📅 18/11/2025 | 📍 Paris | @academiesciences.bsky.social
💡 Modèles économiques, accords éditeurs, évaluation disciplinaire & interdisciplinaire
➡️ Infos : urlr.me/ruf6UB
Science ouverte et évaluation de la recherche - Enjeux et perspectives | Académie des sciences
Science ouverte et évaluation de la recherche - Enjeux et perspectives Cette conférence vise à apporter des réponses concrètes et à ouvrir la discussion sur les enjeux d’une évaluation transparente, o...
www.academie-sciences.fr
October 29, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
"The advent of large language models have made this type of content relatively easy to churn out on demand, and the majority of the review articles we receive are little more than annotated bibliographies, with no substantial discussion of open research issues."
arXiv will no longer accept review articles and position papers unless they have been accepted at a journal or a conference and complete successful peer review.

This is due to being overwhelmed by a hundreds of AI generated papers a month.

Yet another open submission process killed by LLMs.
Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category – arXiv blog
blog.arxiv.org
November 2, 2025 at 7:51 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
The #OpenScience movement aims to transform how scientists work with each other and with society. These shifts pull in different directions — and “scientific cultures” helps make sense of the tension.

NEW BLOG: Tensions in Open Science and Scientific Culture
www.scholcommlab.ca/2025/10/21/t...
Tensions in Open Science and Scientific Culture
Open Science (OS) holds a powerful promise: to serve society by providing universal public access to knowledge. But, as we continue to see OS be adopted across the world, it becomes increasingly cl…
www.scholcommlab.ca
October 21, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
Mise à jour : Sortir de Google Scholar, Scopus ou Web of Science : que valent Lens, Dimensions, OpenAlex et Matilda pour la recherche bibliographique ?
Mise à jour : Sortir de Google Scholar, Scopus ou Web of Science : que valent Lens, Dimensions, OpenAlex et Matilda pour la recherche bibliographique ?
« Depuis quelques années, de nouveaux moteurs de recherche académique viennent compléter l’offre dominée jusque-là par Google Scholar, Scopus et le Web of Science. Bibliodiversité, nouveaux t…
lalist.inist.fr
October 28, 2025 at 10:33 AM
Reposted by Fred Bordignon
👀ICYMI: "When members of Reddit’s r/schizophrenia discovered their posts had been analysed in a published paper ~ the backlash was swift."

@drsbrooke.bsky.social & Nick Oh, on doing ethical AI research.

#AIResearch #PublicData #ResearchEthics blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
A practical blueprint for legal and ethical AI research - Impact of Social Sciences
To use public data researchers must navigate legal regulations & platform norms. The PETLP framework shows how privacy-by-design can be built in at the outset.
blogs.lse.ac.uk
October 28, 2025 at 5:03 PM