Professor in European Political Economy
@GIESGhent @UGent
Reposted by Ferdi De Ville
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐈 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞
👉journalistiek
👉gezondheid
👉overheid
👉privacy
👉fiscaliteit
👉milieu
👉onderwijs
👉muziek
👉oorlog
👉werk
Ontdek 'em via sampol.be/latest
🚗 European carmakers, stuck in reverse thanks to short-sighted management, now honking for short-sighted policies.
www.ft.com/content/7ec0...
The issue isn’t the 2035 engine ban - it’s demand falling off a cliff today
With @sandertordoir.bsky.social and @lucasguttenberg.bsky.social, we show why flipping regs won’t help - and what the EU can do instead.
Reposted by Dani Rodrik, Joe R. Feagin, Ferdi De Ville
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Reposted by Ruth Dassonneville, Claire Dupont, Alessandro Nai
Join us as TT Professor in "The EU in Global Politics".
Come research & teach in the heart of Europe 🇪🇺📍Ghent.
📝 Apply: jobs.ugent.be/job/Ghent-Do...
📅 Deadline: 27/11/2025
#AcademicJobs #EUStudies #GhentUniversity #TenureTrack #GlobalPolitics
Die "de minimis" vrijstelling is ooit ingevoerd als vorm van "administratieve vereenvoudiging".
Toont dat simplificatie ("cutting red tape") toch niet altijd in voordeel van bedrijven is.
www.standaard.be/economie/pak...
Reposted by Stijn Oosterlynck, Kurt Vandaele, Ferdi De Ville
That number is misleading, as Smaghi explains. Lower intra-EU trade isn’t just about barriers but also consumer preferences for domestic products like food.
iep.unibocconi.eu/europes-inte...
Reposted by Ferdi De Ville
Wat betekent dit akkoord voor de toekomst en geloofwaardigheid van de Unie?
@ferdideville.bsky.social voor #Zomerreeks #MakeEuropeGreatAgain #Mega2025
2000 miljard € is niet gelijk aan 1,26% van het Bruto Europees Product.
2000 miljard € / 7 (aantal jaren dat het MFF loopt) is gelijk aan ongeveer 1,26% van het Bruto Europees Product.
Einde bericht.
Reposted by Ferdi De Ville
on.ft.com/4iqnU3J
And lunch was even (kind of) free!
Reposted by Ferdi De Ville
Reposted by Ferdi De Ville
Hoe dat precies moet? Dat leest u hieronder
He aims to hit 3 goals: onshoring production, raising revenue and extracting concessions.
But he faces a trilemma: these goals cannot be achieved simultaneously.
@koenverhelst.bsky.social @andybounds.bsky.social @alanbeattie.bsky.social
Aligning with US on China comes with negative effects on the economy and climate cooperation with China (5/6)
- deterrence: retaliating with tariffs on US exports
- diplomacy: making deals with Trump
- diversification: reducing trade exposure to US
But each strategy comes with risks (3/6)
- if tariffs decrease imports, they will not generate that much revenue, and will reduce US leverage over exporting countries
- if tariffs are used to extract concessions through deals, they will also not generate revenues, nor reduce the deficits (2/6)
For Trump, tariffs are like a Swiss Army Knife. They should:
- reduce trade deficits
- generate revenue to pay tax cuts
- provide diplomatic leverage (1/6)