PI @inserm
https://oss-clcc.univ-rennes.fr/
#OpenAccess: doi.org/10.1038/s413...
#OpenAccess: doi.org/10.1038/s413...
"It is a serious thing, just to be alive on this fresh morning, in the broken world."-Mary Oliver
"It is a serious thing, just to be alive on this fresh morning, in the broken world."-Mary Oliver
Also great to see Dicty in the #TeamTomo spotlight! #ProtistsOnSky @kgeissler.bsky.social @becklab.bsky.social 🧪
Also great to see Dicty in the #TeamTomo spotlight! #ProtistsOnSky @kgeissler.bsky.social @becklab.bsky.social 🧪
Also great to see Dicty in the #TeamTomo spotlight! #ProtistsOnSky @kgeissler.bsky.social @becklab.bsky.social 🧪
Clues for Glues review by @zkozicka.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1042/EBC2...
Clues for Glues review by @zkozicka.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1042/EBC2...
biomed.news/bims-auttor/...
biomed.news/bims-auttor/...
Highlight: Multi-scale classification decodes the complexity of the human E3 ligome www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Highlight: Multi-scale classification decodes the complexity of the human E3 ligome www.nature.com/articles/s41...
It is absolutely necessary.
Due to its inherent undersampling, 2D omic mapping is almost always misleading.
See details here: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
It is absolutely necessary.
Due to its inherent undersampling, 2D omic mapping is almost always misleading.
See details here: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Inserm #ShenzhenBayLaboratory #ambassadedefranceenchine #institutfrançais
lnkd.in/eygqBe8H
lnkd.in/ee88be-F
lnkd.in/e__7WYTJ
Inserm #ShenzhenBayLaboratory #ambassadedefranceenchine #institutfrançais
lnkd.in/eygqBe8H
lnkd.in/ee88be-F
lnkd.in/e__7WYTJ
11/11
11/11
Transparency sets the floor.
Scientific judgment stays with researchers.
10/11
Transparency sets the floor.
Scientific judgment stays with researchers.
10/11
Funders should use their leverage to force transparency, not to rank or judge journals.
9/11
Funders should use their leverage to force transparency, not to rank or judge journals.
9/11
Publishing in Biology (MDPI) costs ~$3,400
for profit, 17.5 day turnaround, doesn't pay reviewers
Biology Open @biologists.bsky.social costs $2,500
nonprofit, ≤7 working day turnaround, pays reviewers, uses explicit rubrics and QC checks.
5/11
journals.biologists.com/bio/pages/fa...
Publishing in Biology (MDPI) costs ~$3,400
for profit, 17.5 day turnaround, doesn't pay reviewers
Biology Open @biologists.bsky.social costs $2,500
nonprofit, ≤7 working day turnaround, pays reviewers, uses explicit rubrics and QC checks.
5/11
journals.biologists.com/bio/pages/fa...
@hhmi-science.bsky.social requires preprints on servers like @openrxiv.bsky.social
Others restrict use of grant funds for APCs. But these policies don't address journal quality and peer-review rigor.
3/11
@hhmi-science.bsky.social requires preprints on servers like @openrxiv.bsky.social
Others restrict use of grant funds for APCs. But these policies don't address journal quality and peer-review rigor.
3/11
This is not about prestige.
It’s about quality and accountability.
2/11
This is not about prestige.
It’s about quality and accountability.
2/11
Probably not.
But funders could mandate where grantees cannot publish.
🧵
1/11
Probably not.
But funders could mandate where grantees cannot publish.
🧵
1/11
C'est un beau résumé de ces gros nazis.
- Les juges qui agissent contre les crimes internationaux
- Les responsables d'ONG luttant contre la haine (!)
- Un ex-commissaire européen en raison d'un choix démocratique souverain.
Ce régime est ennemi mortel de la démocratie libérale.
C'est un beau résumé de ces gros nazis.
- One image analyst
- one biologist interested in working on lymphatics!
Reach out if you are interested 👍
We are all recruiting, so keep an eye on our website If you are looking for a postdoc position 😀
www.helsinki.fi/en/researchg...
I will be recruiting two postdocs early next year. One image analyst and one biologist interested in working on lymphatics!
- One image analyst
- one biologist interested in working on lymphatics!
Reach out if you are interested 👍
The #LLM was trained on, but doesn’t mention, Smith’s work.
You adopt the suggestions containing Smith’s ideas.
You don’t even realize YOU’VE PLAGIARIZED because you’ve never read or heard of Smith.