Researcher in Machine Learning and Contemplative arts.
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=KjOV76MAAAAJ&hl=en
Recsys book author https://amzn.to/3ANPx6e
consider also the possibility that it's a category error to expect a nebulous term like intelligence to map in any sensible way onto "fundamental principles"
I just read some ICLR reviews. Absolutely junk. No insight. Written by humans, but could have been written by a chatbot or teenager who had read a few dozen reviews.
Why do we think this is useful? Only 5% (if that!) of the community has worthwhile opinions.
Part 1: dynomight.net/chess/
Part 2: dynomight.net/more-chess/
Part 1: dynomight.net/chess/
Part 2: dynomight.net/more-chess/
page: genechou.com/kfcw
page: genechou.com/kfcw
Read on for more details in the thread! 👇
Read on for more details in the thread! 👇
As way of introduction to this research approach, I'll provide here a very short thread outlining the definition of the field I gave recently at our BRAIN NeuroAI workshop at the NIH.
🧠📈
• stay open minded
• skate where the puck is heading
• don’t neglect your task-specific evals
[ #Art #Artwork #OCs #OriginalCharacters #Comics // #DEITIESProject #Atum #Apep #EgyptianMythology ]
If you are working in data:
- BlueSky is the place to connect with other developers
- LinkedIn is where to reach industry contacts
- X is just not where your audience is any longer
If you are working in data:
- BlueSky is the place to connect with other developers
- LinkedIn is where to reach industry contacts
- X is just not where your audience is any longer
So is this what understanding the brain means? The better the ANN fits the brain data the more we understand the brain?
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
So is this what understanding the brain means? The better the ANN fits the brain data the more we understand the brain?
1. See, e.g., homotopy type theory and the “univalence axiom”.
chromewebstore.google.com/detail/sky-f...
chromewebstore.google.com/detail/sky-f...