Posting about politics, authoritarianism, and Central Asia.
Up first: Brazil (1985), which reminds us that an innocent-seeming typo can prove deadly in authoritarian bureaucracies.
And the US is throwing it away, because Americans elected a govt ideologically opposed to truth, science, merit, and racial/gender equality, preferring to weaken the country to reduce that.
www.cnn.com/2026/01/15/p...
www.cnn.com/2026/01/15/p...
"Ukraine commits to full disarmament, including strategic offensive weapons, in exchange for economic support & (this is the best part) security assurances from the USA & Russia".
So you can trust us now
"Ukraine commits to full disarmament, including strategic offensive weapons, in exchange for economic support & (this is the best part) security assurances from the USA & Russia".
So you can trust us now
It would be a conquest, the destruction of an alliance, another instance of gunboat diplomacy, another blow to the rules-based order. Not a real estate deal.
It would be a conquest, the destruction of an alliance, another instance of gunboat diplomacy, another blow to the rules-based order. Not a real estate deal.
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior. /end
@reuters.com
Up first: Brazil (1985), which reminds us that an innocent-seeming typo can prove deadly in authoritarian bureaucracies.
Up first: Brazil (1985), which reminds us that an innocent-seeming typo can prove deadly in authoritarian bureaucracies.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/05/u...
Whether Maduro was a bad guy (he was); whether his regime trafficked drugs (it did); whether what comes next is better / more legitimate (unclear), this catapults us back to 1900's spheres-of-influence logics, greenlighting conquest by Russia, China & others.
Whether Maduro was a bad guy (he was); whether his regime trafficked drugs (it did); whether what comes next is better / more legitimate (unclear), this catapults us back to 1900's spheres-of-influence logics, greenlighting conquest by Russia, China & others.
Unsubscribe and merry Christmas in that order.
Unsubscribe and merry Christmas in that order.
Think forward three years. I very much hope we're saying, "In retrospect, maybe we overreacted," rather than "In retrospect, we should have seen that coming."
www.nbcnews.com/video/shorts...
Think forward three years. I very much hope we're saying, "In retrospect, maybe we overreacted," rather than "In retrospect, we should have seen that coming."
www.nbcnews.com/video/shorts...
The only puzzle is why you repeat "puzzle" and "puzzling" over and over.
Sincerely,
Common Sense
The only puzzle is why you repeat "puzzle" and "puzzling" over and over.
Sincerely,
Common Sense