Carlos P Carmona
banner
cpcarmona.bsky.social
Carlos P Carmona
@cpcarmona.bsky.social

Trait-based ecology | Biodiversity
Professor of functional ecology
Department of Botany. University of Tartu

Environmental science 56%
Agriculture 16%

Reposted by Carlos P. Carmona

Our new study highlights how competition-driven trait plasticity and growth suppression jointly obscure the link between plant functional traits and seedling growth.

Huge thanks to @cpcarmona.bsky.social and Guochun Shen for their invaluable guidance and collaboration! doi.org/10.1111/ele.70259
Competition‐Induced Trait Variability Obscures Trait–Growth Relationships of Tree Seedlings
Our study reveals that competition fundamentally reshapes trait–growth relationships. Competition simultaneously increases individual trait variability while suppressing growth rates, forcing plants ....
doi.org
Working with individual trait data and functional trait spaces and bored about means?

With @cpcarmona.bsky.social, Agnese Bissi and @etordoni.bsky.social, we put together a perspective to test the effect of individual observations on trait space properties 👇👇

www.nature.com/articles/s44...
Quantifying the influence of intraspecific variability in trait spaces - npj Biodiversity
npj Biodiversity - Quantifying the influence of intraspecific variability in trait spaces
www.nature.com
✨ Paper spotlight ✨

(🧵 1/6) The path towards a unified trait space: synthesizing plant functional diversity
nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
New Tansley Insight in New Phytologist: The path toward a unified plant trait space: synthesizing plant functional diversity.

Why a common trait space matters, how to build it, and what it enables.

With @e-beccari.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1111/nph....

#PlantTraits #FunctionalDiversity
doi.org

I think I’ll learn more from you than you did from me 😅
Congratulations, Kerry!
Super happy that @kerrys189.bsky.social passed her viva with no corrections!! 🥳🥳🥳

Congratulations, Dr. Stewart!!

The EcCo lab will miss you, but we know you are off to do amazing things

Thanks to the excellent examiners @alexpigot.bsky.social & @vlboult.bsky.social

with @stefanomammola.bsky.social, @gracoroza.bsky.social, Gianluigi Ottaviani and Francesco de Bello
Hot off the press 🔥 New Ecological Monographs paper shows why, when and how to include intraspecific trait variability to enhance functional diversity research. Huge shout out to Facundo Palacio for his vision and leadership. Read here 👉 doi.org/10.1002/ecm....
#traits #functionaldiversity 📏🌐
Integrating intraspecific trait variability in functional diversity: An overview of methods and a guide for ecologists
Variability in traits within species (intraspecific trait variability; ITV) has attracted increased interest in functional ecology, as it can profoundly influence the detection of functional trait pa....
doi.org

Too many metrics, I agree! But accumulation curves make sense only for metrics that have set monotonicity/concavity. Divergence or evenness do not meet those properties, so the z slope loses meaning. We still need to match each metric to the facet we want to study.

2. I think they are fundamentally different aspects; a single number wont suffice. For example, some aspects are related to different aspects of the raw distribution of traits (richness, divergence, evennes), but other aspects require species identities (redundancy). But good luck with the search!

1. Yes, papers should report different indices, carefully chosen so that they are suitable for your question.

I would say that the field nowadays treats those criteria as facet-specific (richness, divergence, evenness) rather than universal.

My main concern is that the paper frames the 14 requirements as must-haves for any reliable FD metric, then counts how many each index meets. That creates the impression that indices are flawed.

So, if functional structure (or functional diversity if you prefer) is a distribution, you cannot simply characterize it with a single number, like you cant characterize a probabilistic distribution only with the mean, or the variance, or the kurtosis

The two aspects of extinction are relevant, so you need to estimate both things simultaneously (among other things) to understand well what is going on with functional structure (the distribution of species in the trait space)

But if what you are losing are redundant species, then divergence indices will increase, which matches their expected behaviour (you end up with communities with fewer but more unique species).

In the scenarios related to extinctions (7-8), you expect functional diversity to decrease. This expectation matches the behaviour of richness indices, which work well.

In your ecosystem scenarios, you test different things. For example in scenarios 2, 3 & 4 you are essentially increasing divergence, and this is well detected by divergence indices, but not by richness indices.

And so on. At the end, you can see from your tests that thare are sets of indices that tend to respond in similar ways (like the two sets I mentioned above). And these are the ways one would expect them to respond according to their original conception.

Indices of functional richness (FaD, mFaD, FD) should be insensitive to addition of redundant species and to changes in abundances, an only change when something modifies the boundaries of the distribution of species in the trait space.

Hi Adji! It was just an example. What I mean is that not all criteria should be fulfilled at once for an index to be useful. For example, dispersion indices (Rao, FDiv, FDis) by definition should not fulfil set monotonicity, because they reflect the average dissimilarity among components (species).
You would not judge a hammer by how well it drives a screw; likewise, do not blame a spread metric for failing a richness test. Functional diversity is multifaceted and needs a toolbox, not a universal index.
Rethinking Ecological Measures Of Functional Diversity

'none of the widely used metrics satisfy the requirements. Critical flaws leave them blind to the very biodiversity loss they're intended to detect. There's urgent need to develop new generation of FD metrics'

arxiv.org/abs/2506.17839 #ecopubs

You would not judge a hammer by how well it drives a screw; likewise, do not blame a spread metric for failing a richness test. Functional diversity is multifaceted and needs a toolbox, not a universal index.

Reposted by Carlos P. Carmona

Rethinking Ecological Measures Of Functional Diversity

'none of the widely used metrics satisfy the requirements. Critical flaws leave them blind to the very biodiversity loss they're intended to detect. There's urgent need to develop new generation of FD metrics'

arxiv.org/abs/2506.17839 #ecopubs

👏👏👏

Reposted by Carlos P. Carmona

Projections of extinctions of bird species and losses of functional diversity over the next 100 years suggest that even immediate and widespread threat abatement would be insufficient to prevent losses www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Threat reduction must be coupled with targeted recovery programmes to conserve global bird diversity - Nature Ecology & Evolution
Projections of extinctions of bird species and losses of functional diversity over the next 100 years suggest that even immediate and widespread threat abatement would be insufficient to prevent losse...
www.nature.com

Reposted by Carlos P. Carmona

“Abatement of ‘habitat loss and degradation’ made greatest contribution to avoided species extinctions and functional diversity loss .. If human activity affects biodiversity as today, then in next 100 years, lose >3x number of bird species as lost since 1500.” www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Threat reduction must be coupled with targeted recovery programmes to conserve global bird diversity - Nature Ecology & Evolution
Projections of extinctions of bird species and losses of functional diversity over the next 100 years suggest that even immediate and widespread threat abatement would be insufficient to prevent losse...
www.nature.com

Reposted by Carlos P. Carmona

New paper out on how human activities impact taxonomic vs functional biodiversity, led by @kerrys189.bsky.social