Caroline Armitage
LightNews LightNews
banner
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Caroline Armitage
@carolinearmitage.bsky.social
150 followers 150 following 32 posts
Research Librarian at the University of Bergen (https://www.uib.no/en/persons/Caroline.S.Armitage). Here to keep in the loop about bibliometrics, scientific publishing, open science, research assessment and libraries... plus plus :)
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Caroline Armitage @carolinearmitage.bsky.social · Mar 13
Jeg har slett litt med å finne folk til å følge fra andre UH-bibliotek så... jeg prøver meg på en starter pack med de jeg har funnet! Skal prøve å holde den litt gående, med mindre en bedre versjon finnes hos noen andre :) go.bsky.app/5DFUkmC #bibliosky #universitetsbibliotek
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
davidho.bsky.social
This is the most astonishing graph of what the Trump regime has done to US science. They have destroyed the federal science workforce across the board. The negative impacts on Americans will be felt for generations, and the US might never be the same again.

www.nature.com/immersive/d4...
This line graph illustrates the percentage change in agency staff levels from the previous year for nine major U.S. federal scientific and health organizations between the fiscal years 2016 and 2025. The agencies tracked include the CDC, Department of Energy, EPA, FDA, NASA, NIH, NIST, NOAA, and NSF. For the majority of the timeline between 2016 and 2023, the agencies show relatively stable fluctuations, generally staying within a range of +5% to -5% change per year. However, there is a dramatic and uniform plummet starting in the 2024–25 period. Every agency depicted shows a sharp downward trajectory, with staffing losses ranging from approximately -15% to over -25%. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) shows the most significant decline, dropping to roughly -26%, while the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) shows the least severe but still substantial drop at approximately -15%.
January 20, 2026 at 10:53 PM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
bilboyaga.bsky.social
2025 was mostly garbage, but there were some good moments.

One of my favorites was when a family of beavers built a dam in just a few days, saving the Czech Republic 30 million Czech koruna (US$1.2 million) for a wetland restoration project the government had been planning for 7 years. 🦫 🌿
These eager beavers saved the Czech government $1.2 million
After plans stalled for a new dam in the Czech Republic, eight beavers saved the day seemingly overnight. “At this point, nothing that beavers do surprises me.”
www.nationalgeographic.com
January 4, 2026 at 7:04 PM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
helenczerski.bsky.social
TIL about a memorial ceremony in Iceland in 2019 to mark the end of a glacier, changing the place name from Okjökull to Ok (jökull = glacier). Uncompromising wording on the bronze plaque:
"This is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it".
Bronze plaque saying "A Letter to the Future. Ok is the first Icelandic glacier to lose its status as a glacier. In the next 200 years all our glaciers are expected to follow the same path. This monument is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it. August 2019. 415ppm CO2"
December 7, 2025 at 5:17 PM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
The posters and presentations from the Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy #NWB2025 are now available on Figshare! @nwb2025.bsky.social
Presentations: doi.org/10.6084/m9.f...
Posters: doi.org/10.6084/m9.f...
a close up of a man wearing a pair of glasses with a computer screen reflected in them .
Alt: a close up of a man wearing a pair of glasses with a computer screen reflected in them and data running quickly.
media.tenor.com
December 3, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
anialorenc.bsky.social
It seemed so incredible that I visited the link. It's REAL. What was this story about almost 28% margin profit necessary to maintain high editorial standards?
erikangner.com Erik Angner @erikangner.com · Nov 27
"Runctitiononal features"? "Medical fymblal"? "1 Tol Line storee"? This gets worse the longer you look at it. But it's got to be good, because it was published in Nature Scientific Reports last week: www.nature.com/articles/s41... h/t @asa.tsbalans.se
Infographic with AI slop published in Nature Scientific Reports
November 28, 2025 at 9:42 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
A really great set of 3 papers for anyone wanting to get to grips with systemic issues in scientific publishing in a concise and data-supported way!
hansonmark.bsky.social Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · Nov 11
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:

a 🧵 1/n

Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below. 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. A figure detailing the drain on researcher time. 1. The four-fold drain 1.2 Time The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce, with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure 1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs, grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time. The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many review demands. Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in ‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier, local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision. A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below: 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
November 13, 2025 at 8:40 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
hedgielib.bsky.social
Bug in Springer Nature metadata may be causing ‘significant, systemic’ citation inflation retractionwatch.com/2025/11/11/b...
Bug in Springer Nature metadata may be causing ‘significant, systemic’ citation inflation
Millions of researchers could be affected by a “dramatic distortion of citation counts” likely caused by flaws in how the academic publishing giant Springer Nature handles article metadata, accordi…
retractionwatch.com
November 12, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
jedbrown.org
You know what doesn't wear an "I read banned books" shirt to work?

A censorious computer program labeled "librarian".

And that denial of agency is why fascists are so eager to displace librarians with a machine that does not do the same job and thereby poses no threat to power.
November 7, 2025 at 5:46 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
This is so nice. I love libraries.
orkneylibrary.bsky.social Orkney Library & Archive @orkneylibrary.bsky.social · Oct 27
The clocks have gone back and we are moving towards the darker months so we are DELIGHTED to launch our new Wintering Well Kits - FREE loanable kits containing a portable plug-in therapy lamp, along with other resources to help people who struggle during the winter months. ☀️💡
A SAD lamp and booklet on the beach
October 28, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
olivia.science
"We are told that AI is inevitable, that we must adapt or be left behind. But universities are not tech companies. Our role is to foster critical thinking, not to follow industry trends uncritically." www.ru.nl/en/research/...
September 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Interesting! "Closed commercial databases, such as Web of Science, are not in line with our desire to work with open research information as much as possible. The UU signed the Barcelona Declaration in 2024 to this effect."
jeroenson.bsky.social Jeroen Sondervan @jeroenson.bsky.social · Sep 8
What might seem like a small announcement—it’s just one institution—actually carries substantial weight and has a strong symbolic meaning.

@utrechtuniversity.bsky.social, has taken another bold step: it won't renew its Web of Science license. www.uu.nl/en/news/acce...
Access to Web of Science will end on 1 January 2026
The university library has decided not to renew the licence for access to the Web of Science citation database (including Journal Citation Reports).
www.uu.nl
September 10, 2025 at 12:02 PM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
If I'm honest, it's taken me longer than it should have to get to grips with what it does, ticking along behind things - but yes!
telescoper.bsky.social Peter Coles 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ @telescoper.bsky.social · Sep 3
Crossref is a marvellous thing, not least because most researchers are not at all aware of the immense amount of good work it does behind the scenes.
crossref.bsky.social Crossref @crossref.bsky.social · Sep 3
This year's Annual Meeting & Board Election is more than business as usual. We're celebrating 25 years of community! Share your #metadata story by submitting an abstract by 20 September. https://bit.ly/Crossref2025-CFA
September 8, 2025 at 9:55 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Program for #nwb2025 is now out - only a few places left! www.nifu.no/nwb2025/prog... @nwb2025.bsky.social
Program
NWB2025Practical informationProgramRegistrationAbout NWB The preliminary structure of the NWB 2025 program is now available. Please note that this outline is subject to revision prior to finalizati...
www.nifu.no
September 2, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
jsaebo.bsky.social
På torsdag er det gratis online seminar (Open Science Lunch) hvor jeg skal snakke om da tidskriftet "vårt" ble kapret og det ble produsert falske artikler i mitt navn. Kom og hør en ekte røverhistorie fra akademia! www.ub.uio.no/english/cour...
Journal hijacking – the story of the Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems - University of Oslo Library
In early 2023, the editor of the Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (SJIS) became aware that a fake clone of the journal had started to operate, tricking authors into paying article processin...
www.ub.uio.no
August 25, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
sciencepainted.bsky.social
Excited to share my SK post on this platform!
August 26, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
forskning.bsky.social
– Vi har forsket ferdig. Nå trenger vi handling, sier marinbiologer.
Artikkelen er produsert av Universitetet i Oslo. www.forskning.no/biologisk-ma...
August 19, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
jennyostrop.bsky.social
Would you like to analyze your data in a smarter way, but need some help to get started? Join our next Software Carpentry @carpentries.carpentries.org course at @unibergen.bsky.social! Sign-up deadline is this Friday, Aug 22nd: www.uib.no/en/ub/178263...
August 18, 2025 at 1:28 PM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
"Rogue Scholar science blog archive improves science blogs in important ways, including full-text search, long-term archiving, DOIs and metadata, and communities" - Well this seems cool! Posting for anyone with a blog to check out: rogue-scholar.org
Rogue Scholar
rogue-scholar.org
August 18, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
drbeard79.bsky.social
I love chairing panels at academic conferences and I Have Thoughts about it!

I think it’s a really important service role AND you can create the conditions for everyone in the panel to have a good time AND it can be fun!

A 🧵👇 1/9
July 13, 2025 at 2:03 PM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Registration now open to join us in Bergen for the Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy in October! www.nifu.no/nwb2025/ #nwb2025 #bibliosky
A photo of Bergen harbour and Bryggen in the sunset, with the tall sailing ship Statsraad Lehmkuhl by the docks. The text says "Nordic workshop on bibliometrics & research policy 2025".
July 1, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
stfisherhoyrem.bsky.social
Bra jobba av @refz.bsky.social. Men også trist at bibliotekene må bruke ressurser på sånt "politiarbeid."
Forsker har fått trukket tilbake 16 artikler
Noroff-forskeren publiserte én artikkel hver tredje dag. Han er også den i Norge som de siste årene har fått flest artikler trukket tilbake fordi tidsskriftet de var publisert i ikke lenger kunne stå ...
www.khrono.no
June 26, 2025 at 7:13 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
kayguccione.bsky.social
Today's 5min MUST READ is from @tseenster.bsky.social and @drmeagantyler.bsky.social and looks as memes as a route into the hidden curriculum, and their utility to help unpick pervasive messages that shape our research culture.

drhiddencurriculum.wordpress.com/2025/06/17/i...
I can has research culture? Using memes in researcher development
Dr Tseen Khoo is an Associate Professor, Researcher Development (EMCR), with the Researcher Development Academy, Deakin University, Australia. Tseen created and runs the researcher development and …
drhiddencurriculum.wordpress.com
June 17, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Reposted by Caroline Armitage
litterat.party
Hjelp
Onsdag avslørte statsminister Jonas Gahr Støre hvem som får over én milliard til nye sentre for kunstig intelligens. Han fortalte også at han selv ba ChatGPT om råd før møtet med Donald Trump.
June 12, 2025 at 6:40 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
Abstract submission closes tomorrow! #NWB2025
nwb2025.bsky.social NWB2025 @nwb2025.bsky.social · Mar 13
The 30th Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy takes place in Bergen, Norway October 29-31 this year. The Call for Abstracts is now out, and submissions open March 17th. Presentations and posters alike are welcome. Hope to see you there?
Welcome to Bergen in 2025!
Welcome to the 30th Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy (NWB 2025). Nordic Institute for Studies of Innovation, Research and Education are hosts together with the University Library o...
www.nifu.no
June 6, 2025 at 9:35 AM
carolinearmitage.bsky.social
"... denne saken angår ikke bare universitetet i Trondheim, men hele Universitets-Norge. Den berører spørsmålet om hva et universitetsbibliotek skal være." www.khrono.no/skap-et-demo...
Skap et demokratihus på Universitetsbiblioteket ved NTNU
Vi ønsker oss et modig og sosialt engasjert bibliotek som tar ansvar for å bygge en sterkere kultur for lesing, for demokratisk ordskifte og for den sakte, nyanserte kritiske tenkningen.
www.khrono.no
May 28, 2025 at 11:32 AM