Blayne Haggart
banner
bhaggart.bsky.social
Blayne Haggart
@bhaggart.bsky.social
Professor, Political Science, Brock University
Knowledge governance, IPE, Sydney Swans tragic

Co-author, with Natasha Tusikov, The New Knowledge: Information, Data and the Remaking of Global Power (Bloomsbury, 2023). Open Access.
"Does this Super Bowl’s record-breaking A.I. ad splurge also portend a coming pop?"

One can only hope.
(Good article.)
happy Super Bowl Sunday! for all you commercials sickos, I make the case that this game's ad blitz will be to A.I. what 2022's was to crypto and 2000's was to the dot-com boom—with all attendant implications for our broader economy and the celebrity-promotion complex: slate.com/technology/2...
The Biggest Star of the Super Bowl Isn’t an Athlete—or Bad Bunny
We’ve seen this game before, and it doesn’t end well for anyone.
slate.com
February 8, 2026 at 6:04 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
Alright. Fine.

Fighter aircraft AMA, as someone who independently reviewed Canada's choices in 2012-2014 and 2019.

Go!
February 8, 2026 at 3:20 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
CBC continues to scold Canadians on the need to keep our "politics" out of the discussion on whether we get strong-armed into buying the F-35.
Lol... the F-35 is all about politics.
It is the politics of threat and intimidation against our independence.

www.cbc.ca/news/politic...
No place for politics in F-35 cockpits as Canadian fighter jet pilots get ready to train at U.S. base | CBC News
While procurement for Canada’s complete fighter jet fleet remains up in the air, advocates say politics need to be set aside as members of the Royal Canadian Air Force head to Luke Air Force Base in A...
www.cbc.ca
February 8, 2026 at 2:32 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
There is no way to fix the core problem, which is that the statistical production of symbols by definition is not based on their meaning
Would be interesting to compare the results on more recent models - but this problem won’t go away. LLMs are always going to be extrapolating from what has already, and often, been thought, which is why they aren’t windows to the future but anchors to the past.
Neat demonstration of how artificial so-called intelligence is taking us backwards.

"ChatGPT produced content most consistent with the 1960s and DALL-E 3 in the late 1980s and early '90s."

#AI - see @shannonvallor.bsky.social's work for important thinking on this
phys.org/news/2026-02...
February 7, 2026 at 2:38 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
Human beings can understand many ways symbols may be related.

LLMs only model one: these things often appear together. This sequence is in some sense likely.

Likelihood is not sufficient
February 7, 2026 at 3:02 PM
A thoughtful essay worth your time. But I wonder if focusing on capitalism v socialism misses the more fundamental fault line: AI's supplanting of "scientific" knowledge with a new form of oracular knowledge.
Gonna have to think about this one...
February 7, 2026 at 3:44 PM
One interesting point about Carney’s EV plan from last night’s At Issue panel. It’s targeted at a sector (EVs) that Trump doesn’t care about/is actively hostile towards. Which reduces the chance of retaliation.
Good strategy.
February 6, 2026 at 10:18 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
They are. Plainly, they open numerous vulnerabilities. www.mckinsey.com/capabilities...
February 6, 2026 at 2:15 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
February 6, 2026 at 1:17 PM
One of several AI questions that so many people would rather pretend doesn’t exist.
(The other big one involves the impossibility of gaining meaningful consent for the use of data underling AI models.)
I am not a computer security expert. Can someone explain to my why every AI agent (Claude Code, whatever) with read/write/execute privileges is not a gigantic security vulnerability for every computer on which it is installed?
1Password not mincing words here:

"If you are experimenting with OpenClaw, do not do it on a company device. Full stop."

"If you have already run OpenClaw on a work device, treat it as a potential incident and engage your security team immediately."

1password.com/blog/from-ma...
February 6, 2026 at 2:27 PM
Ongoing deep integration by any other name.
These are not the actions of a government with any intention of substantively distancing Canada from US influence.

Words v actions.

www.thestar.com/opinion/star...
February 6, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
Good op-ed-style analysis by Andrew Coyne. Only the federalism part is a bit shallow, to say the least.

Unlike in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, we generally don't recognize the importance of federal governance anymore. Not sure why.

www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...
Opinion: Canada is uniquely unprepared for the dire national-security crisis we are now in
Our complacency has led to an overburdened police force, a lack of foreign-intelligence capacity, a high dependence on the U.S. for trade and a paucity of internal political cohesion
www.theglobeandmail.com
February 6, 2026 at 12:50 PM
So the government’s proposed EV rebate is $5,000 for cars under $50k. Which will cover exactly how many cars? The 2026 Nissan Leaf is pretty much the smallest, cheapest EV in the Canadian market (ask me how I know). Its cheapest model lists at $48k before taxes, accessories, etc etc.
February 6, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Carney’s auto strategy looks promising. But if, as suggested here, it depends on eliminating US tariffs & a new USMCA, that’s a huge red flag.
Any policy that depends on the return of an unattainable certainty in Can-US relations is based on hope, not reality.
www.theglobeandmail.com/business/com...
February 6, 2026 at 12:31 PM
Good points here pointing to a failure to focus on reforming fundamental governance processes. Left unsaid is that the federal government under Trudeau and now Carney has *chosen not to* addresses these issues for an entire year. This isn’t a failure of Canadians. It’s an ongoing policy choice.
Opinion: Canada is uniquely unprepared for the dire national-security crisis we are now in
Our complacency has led to an overburdened police force, a lack of foreign-intelligence capacity, a high dependence on the U.S. for trade and a paucity of internal political cohesion
www.theglobeandmail.com
February 6, 2026 at 12:23 PM
That’s nice.

Now ask about what Elon Musk’s Teslas are capable of doing right now: www.jalopnik.com/your-car-is-...

www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
Ottawa says it won’t allow Chinese EVs to be used for spying on Canadians
Public Safety Minister says safeguards will be in place to ensure the vehicles can’t transmit information back home
www.theglobeandmail.com
February 6, 2026 at 11:30 AM
In contrast, Canada's Minister for AI Promotion took to X after midnight on a Sunday to let people know that Canada wouldn't be banning X.

The standard you walk past, is the standard you accept.

bsky.app/profile/rach...
February 6, 2026 at 2:56 AM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
In Davos, the message was that the US under Trump - and Rubio - had demolished the rules based order, & nothing is normal anymore.

Today, the message is we're embracing & working closely with those same guys who demolished the rules based order, as if it was normal.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
February 6, 2026 at 12:55 AM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
How many provinces and territories will show us leadership on shunning the CSAM platform before the Carney government gets around to it?
February 5, 2026 at 9:47 PM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
I've been sitting on this thread since maybe this time last year. Not in a tea-spilling way, in a procrastinatn/self-doubt way. I thought it'd become redundant. But we've endured like 4 major cycles now of "everyone realizing" what marginalized ppl ALREADY KNEW ALL ALONG. So here we go: 🧵
February 5, 2026 at 7:01 PM
Good.
New Brunswick, an east coast Canadian province of about 900,000 people, will no longer use billionaire Elon Musk’s social media platform X for routine government communications, its leader announced
Canadian Province New Brunswick to Quit Using Elon Musk’s X
New Brunswick, an east coast Canadian province of about 900,000 people, will no longer use billionaire Elon Musk’s social media platform X for routine government communications, its leader announced Thursday.
bloom.bg
February 6, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
Join us for the 8th session in our Gender & Tech Talk Series, "Digital Transformation,” on Feb 24, 10am ET, with the amazing Jamila Venturini/@derechosdigitales.org & Madeleine Fern/CanArctic Inuit Net. Free to all: dtdlab.virginia.edu/event/gender...
@yasmincurzi.com / @uvadatascience.bsky.social
February 5, 2026 at 5:32 PM
In contrast to Europe, Canada’s response has been to leave X/Musk’s many, many inexcusable actions to the largely toothless Privacy Commissioner, with AI Promotion Minister Evan Solomon reassuring everyone via a Midnight Tweet (on X — classy) that Canada wouldn’t be banning X.
February 5, 2026 at 12:39 PM
The pass Carney’s getting for the gap between what people think he’s doing and his actual policies reminds me of how progressives in the 90s were convinced that Paul Martin was on their side, even as he gutted the social programs they valued.
"The FCM says it has learned from officials that a vague reference in the budget to reallocating funds from the Canada Public Transit Fund will in fact mean a $5-billion cut over 10 years"
This is a very slippery government. Whether it's a budget or a high-profile speech, best to read the fine print
February 5, 2026 at 3:27 AM
Reposted by Blayne Haggart
Making life of a university instructor so easy telling students the importance of doing their own essay writing. Well done, gov't.
Canada did a consultation on a new national AI strategy, formed an expert task force to write 32 reports, then used AI to analyze the responses & reports. The result is a summary that strings together 100s of vague action items & flattens nuance and policy trade-offs into false consensus
February 5, 2026 at 3:05 AM