NB: It's probably more complicated than you think - whatever it is.
The ad did not, in fact, misrepresent Reagan's views. But the idea that anyone needs the Reagan Foundation's goddamn permission to use the publicly broadcast official remarks of a former president and/or edit them for brevity is crazy
The ad did not, in fact, misrepresent Reagan's views. But the idea that anyone needs the Reagan Foundation's goddamn permission to use the publicly broadcast official remarks of a former president and/or edit them for brevity is crazy
Which is just another layer of irony…
…given that this is state action against protest about state action against protest.
Which is just another layer of irony…
…given that this is state action against protest about state action against protest.
Which is just another layer of irony…
…given that this is state action against protest about state action against protest.
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
www.theguardian.com/politics/202...
NYT just covered it. 1/n
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/c...
NYT just covered it. 1/n
www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/c...
Cowardly little shitposter is too scared to use his own name.
Cowardly little shitposter is too scared to use his own name.