it’s amazing in this moment for anyone in public education to say “you know what kids don’t really need to learn? how to speak for themselves and how to piece together their own arguments about what’s real and true in the face of a lot of bullshit”
December 26, 2025 at 3:30 AM
it’s amazing in this moment for anyone in public education to say “you know what kids don’t really need to learn? how to speak for themselves and how to piece together their own arguments about what’s real and true in the face of a lot of bullshit”
To summarize - hard to accept from tech bros & policymakers who sat around Harkness Tables with 11 peers interactively opining on history, philosophy and literature that "other peoples' children" should be placed in sparsely supervised rooms of cubicles interacting with AI bots on tablets.
December 24, 2025 at 2:45 PM
To summarize - hard to accept from tech bros & policymakers who sat around Harkness Tables with 11 peers interactively opining on history, philosophy and literature that "other peoples' children" should be placed in sparsely supervised rooms of cubicles interacting with AI bots on tablets.
You are painting a vision of a future in which teachers create lessons with "A.i.," students complete them with "A.i.," and teachers grade them with "A.i."
No learning takes place under this system.
The only benefactors of this system are the corporations being paid for the "A.i." products.
December 24, 2025 at 4:20 AM
i really, really want to believe in public schools
whatever is going on in higher ed in terms of theories of reading and selection, an enthusiastic teacher discussing and writing about an old book with kids at taxpayer expense remains a good idea
December 23, 2025 at 7:26 PM
whatever is going on in higher ed in terms of theories of reading and selection, an enthusiastic teacher discussing and writing about an old book with kids at taxpayer expense remains a good idea
Thank you for writing this. I have been teaching English in NYC schools for over a decade and in that time I have seen our discipline dismantled piece by piece by edtech under the guise of “reforms” or “measuring progress.”
December 23, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Thank you for writing this. I have been teaching English in NYC schools for over a decade and in that time I have seen our discipline dismantled piece by piece by edtech under the guise of “reforms” or “measuring progress.”
To be clear: this is also a call-to-action for me! I think sometimes the busy-ness of trying to do everything we want to do can distract from valuing our own intellectual life and the habits needed for its foundation.
i just don't think there are any shortcuts--if we want kids who are readers, we need teachers who are readers, and if we want teachers who are readers, we need professors who are readers
December 23, 2025 at 1:59 AM
i just don't think there are any shortcuts--if we want kids who are readers, we need teachers who are readers, and if we want teachers who are readers, we need professors who are readers
I have retreated so much from even trying to hold the line on canon, diversity, and depth. Here in Bridgeport I’m down to just barely keeping AI at bay.
December 22, 2025 at 8:35 PM
I have retreated so much from even trying to hold the line on canon, diversity, and depth. Here in Bridgeport I’m down to just barely keeping AI at bay.
But this is not something a machine could do for us. The goal of all that reading is not a document full of summaries, nor a mind full of "just summaries," because a mind never reads in such an automatic or intellectually inert fashion. We draw connections, and hopefully we change in the process.
December 22, 2025 at 8:01 PM
But this is not something a machine could do for us. The goal of all that reading is not a document full of summaries, nor a mind full of "just summaries," because a mind never reads in such an automatic or intellectually inert fashion. We draw connections, and hopefully we change in the process.
when I interviewed for social studies at harvard my interviewer said “this is the only time in their lives the students will see these texts” and what she named opportunity, seemed to me abject failure.
December 22, 2025 at 1:54 PM
when I interviewed for social studies at harvard my interviewer said “this is the only time in their lives the students will see these texts” and what she named opportunity, seemed to me abject failure.
We may be heading toward a world in which it seems peculiar or even foolish to read an article or book in its entirety. Incredibly, schools - K-12 & higher ed. alike - seem reconciled to becoming the accomplices of Big Tech by pointing us there.
For example, one obvious and extremely important thing for which a book is far better than an LLM is validating a stable citation trail. If a book says X you can trace the claim in the citation and it never changes; if an LLM says X you can’t, it a black box. Where does X come from?
December 21, 2025 at 11:11 PM
For example, one obvious and extremely important thing for which a book is far better than an LLM is validating a stable citation trail. If a book says X you can trace the claim in the citation and it never changes; if an LLM says X you can’t, it a black box. Where does X come from?