Stephen Williamson
1954swilliamson.bsky.social
Stephen Williamson
@1954swilliamson.bsky.social

Professor, Western University (University of Western Ontario)

Economics 95%
Business 3%

I thought "the stockings were placed by the chimney with care...," not in the kids' beds.

That's roughly consistent with the dot plots in the SEP. The issue isn't so much what neutral is - though there is a lot of dispersion in the estimates - but how fast to go there.

Excellent. Thoughts like this go through my head when people ask for a research statement as part of a tenure case, or when someone asks for the "intuition."
'My papers say what I have researched. And therefore neither I nor my papers have any more to say. I am a researcher, not a speaker. Do you hear me? Actually, if you're going to interview anyone, you can interview my papers. If you don't find an answer there, then that's your own fault.'
'My papers say what I have researched. And therefore neither I nor my papers have any more to say. I am a researcher, not a speaker. Do you hear me? Actually, if you're going to interview anyone, you can interview my papers. If you don't find an answer there, then that's your own fault.'

If there were recorded music from the 17th century, I would probably listen to that too. Wouldn't you?

I can't remember a Provost saying anything that made sense.

If the jobs of executives can be done by AI, why do we pay those characters so much?
If you actually have to do work, AI often just makes more work because you have to spend so much time making sure it didn't lie to you again.
A study by Dayforce shows 87% of executives use AI for work, compared to 57% of managers and just 27% of employees.

I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?
If you actually have to do work, AI often just makes more work because you have to spend so much time making sure it didn't lie to you again.
A study by Dayforce shows 87% of executives use AI for work, compared to 57% of managers and just 27% of employees.

I think this explains the massive disconnect we see in how CEOs talk about AI versus everyone else. It also raises the question of how useful it truly is for frontline work?
Execs are embracing AI more than their employees are, new research suggests
Research from HR software company Dayforce suggests that executives are leaning into AI far more than their employees.
www.businessinsider.com

Loading meat was not all it was cracked up to be.

Editors do something. Who knew?

This is actually something I might do.
Dad Calling    Just To Say He Loves King Crimson https://theonion.com/dad-calling-just-to-say-he-loves-king-crimson/
Dad Calling    Just To Say He Loves King Crimson https://theonion.com/dad-calling-just-to-say-he-loves-king-crimson/

Take out "the potential to" and the statement is false. And explaining why there is "potential" is quite difficult.
I really don’t think this is true and it’s unclear to be why the BoE does
I really don’t think this is true and it’s unclear to be why the BoE does

2/balances or a halt in passive reductions in the Fed's asset portfolio. Overnight interest rate control is straightforward given existing tools.

1/The Fed has confused the markets by the way it speaks to monetary policy in terms of a fed funds rate range, and by how it sets the interest rates on its reverse repo and standing repo facilities. It's silly to argue that recent developments in overnight markets reflect a need for more reserve...
Wall Street moves to embrace imminent end to Fed balance sheet drawdown and increasingly sees central bank needing to restock financial system with cash.
Market liquidity concerns cloud end of Fed's balance sheet drawdown
As Wall Street's expectations have rapidly shifted toward an imminent end to the Federal Reserve's effort to shrink its bond holdings, some analysts also anticipate a return to balance sheet expansion in relatively short order.
www.reuters.com

4/One puzzle is why the Fed still bothers telling us about its overnight interest rate target in terms of a fed funds rate range, rather than a target for SOFR. Especially since they are in fact targeting SOFR.

3/fall, there will be more takeup on the standing repo facility, and the interest rate offered at the standing repo facility will determine SOFR. So, no big deal. But we will see some window dressing on the Fed's part, as they will want the fed funds rate to fall within the prescribed range...

2/on reserves, reverse repos parked at the Fed, and the Fed's standing repo facility, takeup on the reverse repo facility goes to zero, and then the overnight repo rate (SOFR) becomes unmoored from the rate offered at the reverse repo facility. As the size of the asset portfolio continues to...

1/First, it is not clear what "ample" is supposed to mean. Second, even if we knew what ample means, it's not clear why ample might be optimal. Third, what "tightness?" What we're seeing is that, consistent with past behavior of overnight markets, there's a point where, given the interest rates...
Recent tightness in money markets indicates the Fed is getting near or is at an "ample" level of reserves. Given the political pressure on the Fed, there is surely little stomach for a repeat of 2019 repo turmoil. The Fed has a variety of policy levers at hand (1/n)
Recent tightness in money markets indicates the Fed is getting near or is at an "ample" level of reserves. Given the political pressure on the Fed, there is surely little stomach for a repeat of 2019 repo turmoil. The Fed has a variety of policy levers at hand (1/n)

This paper claims that MMT includes "a well-developed
theoretical framework (including mathematical models)" I scrolled through the paper and couldn't find any symbols, save in some national income accounting identities. No "mathematical model" in sight.
"Modern Money Theory on Fiscal and Monetary Policies: Empirics, Theory and Policymaking"
NEP/RePEc link
to paper
d.repec.org
"Modern Money Theory on Fiscal and Monetary Policies: Empirics, Theory and Policymaking"
NEP/RePEc link
to paper
d.repec.org

Interesting. Waller's speech proposes Fed "payment accounts," which are effectively limited reserve accounts. He doesn't call this stuff central bank digital currency, but clearly the intention is to expand the reach of the Fed in wholesale payments involving the crypo sector.
Governor Waller delivers opening remarks at the Payments Innovation Conference: www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/s...

Watch live: www.federalreserve.gov/conferences/...
www.youtube.com/federalreserve

Learn more about Governor Waller: www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/...
Payments Innovation Conference
economic Conference - The Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington DC.
www.federalreserve.gov

2/about the worst. I would give the prize to Beijing. The air will kill you (though maybe it's improved).

1/If you want a major city, Central Park is pretty nice, though crowded. But, suppose I get to choose my city. Some of these big cities are nice to visit, but I prefer a mid-sized city. Or if I want things that are nice to look at, Boulder Colorado and Banff Alberta are great. We could also talk...

2/listen to the heavy traffic on the Lakeshore. Toronto is worse, of course. There's nothing like that close to the lake, and the Gardiner Expressway is a barrier between the city and the lake.

1/Haha. It looked a lot like the view over the east river I saw 2 weeks ago. Now I recognize the Chicago skyline. I still like it better here. To get down to that running path from Chicago downtown, you have to get across Michigan Ave, Columbus Dr, and the Lakeshore. Then, on the path, you get to...